Claude Haiku
Tied for most recommended of 11 small language models
A fast, cheap Anthropic model that handles well-defined jobs like JSON extraction, summaries and subagent work, though it struggles with real coding and rivals often cost less.
A fast, cheap Anthropic model that handles well-defined jobs like JSON extraction, summaries and subagent work, though it struggles with real coding and rivals often cost less.
352 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 218
- criticize it
- 134
- approval share
- 62%
Recommended in 13 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 4 months
Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 218 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.6 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 13 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Fast and cheap
“Haiku is fastest and also quite good at this! Because the edits are quite accurate in terms of its this element with this value”
Comment from 11 Apr 2026 in “Show HN: CSS Studio. Design by hand, code by agent” “just seeing the difference between Haiku 4.5 (a year ago) and Haiku 5.5 (today - and 1/10th the cost) was worth it alone”
Comment from 8 Oct 2026 in “Claude Haiku 5.5” “Haiku sits at this weird middle point where, if you have a well defined task, you can use a smaller/faster/cheaper model”
Comment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Claude Opus 4.5” - Comment from 7 Oct 2026 in “Claude Haiku 5.5”
- Comment from 18 Apr 2026 in “I'm Coding by Hand”
- Comment from 8 Oct 2026 in “Claude Haiku 5.5”
- Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “GPT 6.1 Sol: Near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price”
- Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All”
Great for structured extraction
“It continues to be absurdly capable for converting natural language to structured JSON based on a set of fairly complex business rules.”
Comment from 22 Sep 2026 in “Claude Opus 5.5” “Haiku 4.5 detected some footers that were on every page and moved them to be the footer at the end of the entire document”
Comment from 18 Mar 2026 in “Mistral AI Releases Forge” “Even small, cheap models like Gemini Flash or Claude Haiku do an excellent job extracting pure content.”
Comment from 15 Jan 2026 in “Please Let Me Read – The Web Was Once Good:(” - Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Anthropic's Model Naming, Extrapolated”
Good cheap subagent
“A subagent with a cheap model like haiku or similar is the way to go instead of dumping tool output directly into the main agent context”
Comment from 11 Sep 2026 in “RTK reports token savings, but our cost benchmarks disagree” “Mostly used Claude Haiku 4.5 like 75% of the time, where it failed, switched to the sonnet 4.5”
Comment from 10 Nov 2025 in “Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (Nov 2025)” “Opus directs and starts haiku/sonnet subagents. Much more efficient than opus reading it all.”
Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “GPT 6.1 Sol: Near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price” Handles simple well-defined tasks
“I used it on an agentic reasoning task recently (reading a chunk of information and drawing a written conclusion, not writing code) and it did just fine.”
Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “Microsoft's MAI-Code-1-Flash Scores 51% SWE-Bench Pro with Just 5B Active Params” “I think Haiku is fine (e.g.) for any task that you could almost, but not quite, complete with (regex?) find and replace.”
Comment from 22 Apr 2026 in “Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual Plans” “To ask for web search, simple commands and research, or passing logs to analyze it's more than enough”
Comment from 12 Sep 2026 in “Ask HN: What default model do you use and why?” - Comment from 7 Oct 2026 in “Meta and Microsoft take steps to reduce employee usage of Claude AI”
- Comment from 11 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.6”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Weak at complex coding
“Then Haiku doesn't work (unless your "complex feature" is just an api endpoint and some UI that consumes it).”
Comment from 22 Apr 2026 in “Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual Plans” “I don't find Haiku useful for actual coding tasks. Good to, ehm, generate commit messages and summaries.”
Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “Microsoft's MAI-Code-1-Flash Scores 51% SWE-Bench Pro with Just 5B Active Params” “I compare it to the Haiku models, where you have to go in and be surgical about your changes”
Comment from 16 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?” Pricier than competing models
“Claude-haiku-4.5 was not far behind and was much faster due to the absence of thinking tokens, but much more expensive.”
Comment from 10 Nov 2025 in “Show HN: What Is Hacker News Working On?” “It was already cheaper and more powerful than Haiku 5.5 which was released like a full month after it”
Comment from 17 Oct 2026 in “DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash-1017” “I don't see a reason to use Sonnet, Haiku, or the smaller GPT models, because their API rates are much higher”
Comment from 11 Jul 2026 in “Inference Optimization for MiMo v2.5: Pushing Hybrid SWA Efficiency to the Limit” - Comment from 7 Oct 2026 in “Claude Haiku 5.5”
- Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All”
Confidently wrong answers
“It fell short answering some of the questions that required some deeper statistical analysis”
Comment from 7 Oct 2026 in “Claude Haiku 5.5” “I know that figure is too low but believed it anyway. I've just asked for better figures and it's completely unable to answer accurately.”
Comment from 23 Aug 2026 in “Coconut oil jet fuel matches kerosene's efficiency in engine tests” “they're blatantly confidently wrong often enough that the wasted time is a significant net negative for me”
Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “Microsoft's MAI-Code-1-Flash Scores 51% SWE-Bench Pro with Just 5B Active Params”
Other small language models people recommend
The four most recommended other small language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude HaikuThis page | 218 | 134 | 62% | 13 | 4 mo4 owners | — |
| OpenAI Luna | 218 | 56 | 80% | 7 | — | Approved |
| Apple Foundation Models | 45 | 35 | 56% | 11 | 1 yr4 owners | — |
| Ministral | 18 | 6 | 75% | 8 | — | Approved |
| Microsoft Phi | 16 | 7 | 70% | 11 | — | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 429 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“It was already cheaper and more powerful than Haiku 5.5 which was released like a full month after it”
“Being able to directly distill their huge frontier models into Luna/Haiku-level models puts them a step ahead still.”
“Luna 6 and now Haiku 5.5 are both very competitive if not better on all axes that we care about”
“Hauku scores higher on AA Intelligence index, and is also cheaper per Intelligence index task.”
“just seeing the difference between Haiku 4.5 (a year ago) and Haiku 5.5 (today - and 1/10th the cost) was worth it alone”
“It fell short answering some of the questions that required some deeper statistical analysis”
“Finally! I understand Haiku is the less intelligent model, but the gap between Sonnet and Opus has been far too wide”
“They generate svg. You can paste in pngs and they'll convert them to svg with varying degrees of success.”
“You can get 99% of jobs and work done with Haiku/Luna in a collaberating working enviroment.”
“Haiku is a bit more expensive than Luna on < 100k token, but I just don't have any agentic work below 100k”
“for many agentic workflows significant part of the dispatched tasks might be under 100k budget”
“Considering the price, no model comes close to being as good as this. However, it did take an extremely long time.”
“100k tokens is an absurdly low cutoff and it is only applicable to Haiku and not Sonnet or Opus”
“Sometimes you prefer a cheap, fast model, just like how sometimes you prefer a shorter poem.”
“Opus directs and starts haiku/sonnet subagents. Much more efficient than opus reading it all.”
“Why are we assuming that shopping agents are going to be using the model that is easiest to fall for prompt injections?”
“It continues to be absurdly capable for converting natural language to structured JSON based on a set of fairly complex business rules.”
“To ask for web search, simple commands and research, or passing logs to analyze it's more than enough”
“A subagent with a cheap model like haiku or similar is the way to go instead of dumping tool output directly into the main agent context”
“I know that figure is too low but believed it anyway. I've just asked for better figures and it's completely unable to answer accurately.”
“Last time a model exceeded the expectations I had based on the release notes to such an extent was Haiku 4.5”
“using something like Haiku to provide a comma separated list of advanced topics and jargon”
“I don't see a reason to use Sonnet, Haiku, or the smaller GPT models, because their API rates are much higher”
“I compare it to the Haiku models, where you have to go in and be surgical about your changes”
“Models like Haiku are great if you just want to apply JSON structure to some free text.”
“I don't find Haiku useful for actual coding tasks. Good to, ehm, generate commit messages and summaries.”
“they're blatantly confidently wrong often enough that the wasted time is a significant net negative for me”
“I used it on an agentic reasoning task recently (reading a chunk of information and drawing a written conclusion, not writing code) and it did just fine.”
“I think Haiku is fine (e.g.) for any task that you could almost, but not quite, complete with (regex?) find and replace.”
“Then Haiku doesn't work (unless your "complex feature" is just an api endpoint and some UI that consumes it).”
“a fast cheap model with large context (Gemini Flash, Claude Haiku) is more cost-effective than a frontier model”
“there has been no reason to use Haiku or GPT mini/nano/etc over open weights models for a long time now”
“Haiku is cheaper, faster, and better than anything that will run on your local machine.”
“Haiku is fastest and also quite good at this! Because the edits are quite accurate in terms of its this element with this value”
“Haiku 4.5 detected some footers that were on every page and moved them to be the footer at the end of the entire document”
“Even small, cheap models like Gemini Flash or Claude Haiku do an excellent job extracting pure content.”
“Whereas with Sonnet/Haiku, I'm much more guaranteed to have 100% AI assistance throughout my coding session.”
“Haiku sits at this weird middle point where, if you have a well defined task, you can use a smaller/faster/cheaper model”
“Claude-haiku-4.5 was not far behind and was much faster due to the absence of thinking tokens, but much more expensive.”
“Mostly used Claude Haiku 4.5 like 75% of the time, where it failed, switched to the sonnet 4.5”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.