Hacker ApprovedDepartments

XeLaTeX

Shares rank 7 of 11 typesetting systems by recommenders

A free LaTeX engine, UTF-8 ready and significantly easier to use in many circumstances. Caveat: some packages work less completely than with pdfLaTeX.

5 people recommended XeLaTeX in Hacker News comments and 1 criticized it, November 2025 to October 2026.

Summary written by Claude from 6 comments. It was written before the November 2026 recount, and 5 of those comments still count.

6 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
mixed feelings
0
warn against or regret it
1

The record

Each figure is one person. RecommendsMixed feelingsCriticizes

Recommended in 4 of 12 months

In 4 different threads.

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 4 of 12 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
  • Recommended in 4 threadsNeeds 5 or more, not met.
  • The biggest thread supplies 40% of its recommendersNeeds half or less, met.

The same rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. Mixed feelings count toward neither side. How the badge works

What people say about it

Reasons grouped from a sample of 5 of the 6 opinions about it, picked in proportion to how many people recommend it, have mixed feelings and criticize it. Each mark is one comment in the sample. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Not limited to advanced users

    “XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX do not introduce any "complications" and are not only for "advanced users”

    Comment from 26 Dec 2025 in “How to Reproduce This Book with LaTeX”

Other typesetting systems people recommend

The four most recommended other typesetting systems, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

XeLaTeX compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendMixedCriticizeApprovalMonthsHad forBadge
Typst164262686%121 yr14 peopleApproved
LaTeX85407653%12——
Quarto243583%9—Approved
TeX2161166%10——
XeLaTeXThis page50183%4——
See all 11 typesetting systems, ranked

What people said

5 of the 6 opinions about it, picked in proportion to the three counts, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“significantly easier to use in many circumstances”

RecommendsComment from 16 Jun 2026 in “Typst 0.15.0”

“UTF-8 ready engines such as LuaLaTeX and XeLaTeX”

RecommendsComment from 6 Mar 2026 in “TeX Live 2026 is available for download now”

“I don’t get why XeLaTeX didn’t automatically obviate all the others by now”

RecommendsComment from 26 Dec 2025 in “How to Reproduce This Book with LaTeX”

“there are still some packages that work flawlessly with pdfLaTeX, but not completely with LuaLaTeX or XeLaTeX”

CriticizesComment from 26 Dec 2025 in “How to Reproduce This Book with LaTeX”

“XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX do not introduce any "complications" and are not only for "advanced users”

RecommendsComment from 26 Dec 2025 in “How to Reproduce This Book with LaTeX”

Counts come from 1,791,911 Hacker News comments labeled by Claude, November 2025 to October 2026, with data through October 31, 2026. Counts updated 2 Nov 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.