WhatsApp for Windows
Shares rank 27 of 48 messaging apps by recommenders
Fans find it faster and more responsive than the web version and handy for attachments; critics say the newer build is a memory-hungry web wrapper.
Fans find it faster and more responsive than the web version and handy for attachments; critics say the newer build is a memory-hungry web wrapper.
58 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 10
- criticize it
- 48
- approval share
- 17%
Recommended in 1 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: not recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: not recommended
- October 2026: not recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 10 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 0.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Faster and more responsive than web
“the desktop app is considerably faster and more responsive.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “The experience of using a native app is far superior.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” Native app feels superior to old version
“The experience of using a native app is far superior.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “the old native windows app was /awful/”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” Acceptable memory use, lighter than web
“Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “a more lightweight experience at 1/10th the RAM consumption”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Meta shipped low-quality, uncaring software
“I don't understand why a company with the size and resources of Meta can't support native versions for Windows, Mac and Linux.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “In this case, it's a skill issue to ship low quality software which is what whoever that team at Meta just did”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “The real explanation is a level of uncaring incompetence that can only be sustained in large organizations.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” - Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
- Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
- Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
Crashes, freezes and lost connections
“it's buggy in either release or beta since months as it loses network connectivity after some time”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “it was silently crashing minimum twice a day every day, and that's under very light use”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “often freezes while I'm trying to type a message, often losing much of what I type”
Comment from 27 Oct 2026 in “Software may be getting worse, but it used to be horrible” Heavy memory and GPU use
“Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “by the time the resulting GPU worker process balloons up to 400MB, that pretty much goes out of the window”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “I’ve has it use 3-4 Gb when I had the channel with cat photos displayed for weeks.”
Comment from 12 Nov 2025 in “WhatsApp on Windows 11, now it opens WebView, uses 1GB RAM all the time” Just a web wrapper, no native gain
“Visually and functionally there's no difference between opening Whatsapp Web and installing this”
Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper” “I really don't understand why WhatsApp would need app especially with the state mentioned here”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
Other messaging apps people recommend
The four most recommended other messaging apps, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 48 messaging apps, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 62 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“often freezes while I'm trying to type a message, often losing much of what I type”
“The desktop app also steals Copy/Paste shortcuts and probably keylogs.”
“open 4 programs that use Electron (Discord, Spotify, VSCode, WhatsApp desktop)”
“It is so disingenuous to mention the whatsapp electron client and not pretend its a slow turd”
“It could chat fine but refused to join calls, displaying an error”
“Meanwhile Zoom, Teams, Webex, and others allow you to join any call without a mic or camera.”
“I was being generous and assuming the chat app "only" used 1GB of ram.”
“Visually and functionally there's no difference between opening Whatsapp Web and installing this”
“def not a true native app”
“both the old web-based and the previous native apps were equally bad”
“In this case, it's a skill issue to ship low quality software which is what whoever that team at Meta just did”
“I don't understand why a company with the size and resources of Meta can't support native versions for Windows, Mac and Linux.”
“it's buggy in either release or beta since months as it loses network connectivity after some time”
“Or, even better, just use the existing, most of the time perfectly working app, and optimize it.”
“Sounds like the all powerful mighty Meta didn't have capable engineering working on that app.”
“The real explanation is a level of uncaring incompetence that can only be sustained in large organizations.”
“it was silently crashing minimum twice a day every day, and that's under very light use”
“Shoving the complexity and cost to users' is being inconsiderate.”
“But the web app is genuinely unusable. Often times takes 2+ minutes to properly load.”
“Meta would have been better off doing like Telegram and just using Qt.”
“they accept a solution that performs completely far worse in both runtime and space complexity”
“aside from restarting when the browser updates or other pedantry, it does”
“I wish they used an SDK and published that, so we could build better clients.”
“the desktop app is considerably faster and more responsive.”
“Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”
“it was much slower (like a minute or two) to “connect” after opening the window compared to before”
“If is anything like the WhatsApp Web, "works" might be optimistic choice of word.”
“the old native windows app was /awful/”
“a more lightweight experience at 1/10th the RAM consumption”
“The experience of using a native app is far superior.”
“how does it gobble 100MB when idle? Are the protocols that complex?”
“very good for quickly attaching pictures and documents, or receiving them”
“by the time the resulting GPU worker process balloons up to 400MB, that pretty much goes out of the window”
“The Ram used here is not for accelerating the user experience.”
“when WhatsApp went from an Electron app to a native windows app it got decisively worse”
“I really don't understand why WhatsApp would need app especially with the state mentioned here”
“Don't they waste more resources vs. creating / fixing the gaps in the native app?”
“what makes this decision truly baffling is that they already had a UWP app”
“I’ve has it use 3-4 Gb when I had the channel with cat photos displayed for weeks.”
“from a security and privacy standpoint there are only upsides”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.