Hacker ApprovedDepartments

WhatsApp for Windows

Shares rank 27 of 48 messaging apps by recommenders

Fans find it faster and more responsive than the web version and handy for attachments; critics say the newer build is a memory-hungry web wrapper.

Fans find it faster and more responsive than the web version and handy for attachments; critics say the newer build is a memory-hungry web wrapper.

58 people gave an opinion

recommend it
10
criticize it
48
approval share
17%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 1 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 10 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 0.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Faster and more responsive than web

    “the desktop app is considerably faster and more responsive.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “The experience of using a native app is far superior.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
  • Native app feels superior to old version

    “The experience of using a native app is far superior.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “the old native windows app was /awful/”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
  • Acceptable memory use, lighter than web

    “Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “a more lightweight experience at 1/10th the RAM consumption”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Meta shipped low-quality, uncaring software

    “I don't understand why a company with the size and resources of Meta can't support native versions for Windows, Mac and Linux.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “In this case, it's a skill issue to ship low quality software which is what whoever that team at Meta just did”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “The real explanation is a level of uncaring incompetence that can only be sustained in large organizations.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”
  • Crashes, freezes and lost connections

    “it's buggy in either release or beta since months as it loses network connectivity after some time”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “it was silently crashing minimum twice a day every day, and that's under very light use”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “often freezes while I'm trying to type a message, often losing much of what I type”

    Comment from 27 Oct 2026 in “Software may be getting worse, but it used to be horrible”
  • Heavy memory and GPU use

    “Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “by the time the resulting GPU worker process balloons up to 400MB, that pretty much goes out of the window”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “I’ve has it use 3-4 Gb when I had the channel with cat photos displayed for weeks.”

    Comment from 12 Nov 2025 in “WhatsApp on Windows 11, now it opens WebView, uses 1GB RAM all the time”
  • Just a web wrapper, no native gain

    “Visually and functionally there's no difference between opening Whatsapp Web and installing this”

    Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

    “I really don't understand why WhatsApp would need app especially with the state mentioned here”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

Other messaging apps people recommend

The four most recommended other messaging apps, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

WhatsApp for Windows compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Signal48633060%139 yrs5 owners—
Discord40073335%1210 yrs24 owners—
WhatsApp30050337%122 yrs3 owners—
Telegram22921152%1210 yrs4 owners—
WhatsApp for WindowsThis page104817%1——
See all 48 messaging apps, ranked

What people said

40 of the 62 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“often freezes while I'm trying to type a message, often losing much of what I type”

CriticizesComment from 27 Oct 2026 in “Software may be getting worse, but it used to be horrible”

“The desktop app also steals Copy/Paste shortcuts and probably keylogs.”

CriticizesComment from 16 Oct 2026 in “Jev meets the Trolley Problem”

“open 4 programs that use Electron (Discord, Spotify, VSCode, WhatsApp desktop)”

CriticizesComment from 14 Jun 2026 in “The Birth and Death of JavaScript (2014)”

“It is so disingenuous to mention the whatsapp electron client and not pretend its a slow turd”

CriticizesComment from 22 Feb 2026 in “When Code is Free, Why is Claude is an Electron app?”

“It could chat fine but refused to join calls, displaying an error”

CriticizesComment from 21 Jan 2026 in “Meta's Legal Team Abandoned Its Ethical Duties”

“Meanwhile Zoom, Teams, Webex, and others allow you to join any call without a mic or camera.”

CriticizesComment from 20 Jan 2026 in “Meta's Legal Team Abandoned Its Ethical Duties”

“I was being generous and assuming the chat app "only" used 1GB of ram.”

CriticizesComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Visually and functionally there's no difference between opening Whatsapp Web and installing this”

CriticizesComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“def not a true native app”

MixedComment from 14 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“both the old web-based and the previous native apps were equally bad”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“In this case, it's a skill issue to ship low quality software which is what whoever that team at Meta just did”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“I don't understand why a company with the size and resources of Meta can't support native versions for Windows, Mac and Linux.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“it's buggy in either release or beta since months as it loses network connectivity after some time”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Or, even better, just use the existing, most of the time perfectly working app, and optimize it.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Sounds like the all powerful mighty Meta didn't have capable engineering working on that app.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“The real explanation is a level of uncaring incompetence that can only be sustained in large organizations.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“it was silently crashing minimum twice a day every day, and that's under very light use”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Shoving the complexity and cost to users' is being inconsiderate.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“But the web app is genuinely unusable. Often times takes 2+ minutes to properly load.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Meta would have been better off doing like Telegram and just using Qt.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“they accept a solution that performs completely far worse in both runtime and space complexity”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“aside from restarting when the browser updates or other pedantry, it does”

MixedComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“I wish they used an SDK and published that, so we could build better clients.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“the desktop app is considerably faster and more responsive.”

RecommendsComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Memory, while I feel that a gigabyte is way to much for what is essentially a chat app, it is virtual memory, so it's not as problematic as I'd like it to be.”

MixedComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“it was much slower (like a minute or two) to “connect” after opening the window compared to before”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“If is anything like the WhatsApp Web, "works" might be optimistic choice of word.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“the old native windows app was /awful/”

MixedComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“a more lightweight experience at 1/10th the RAM consumption”

RecommendsComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“The experience of using a native app is far superior.”

RecommendsComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“how does it gobble 100MB when idle? Are the protocols that complex?”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“very good for quickly attaching pictures and documents, or receiving them”

RecommendsComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“by the time the resulting GPU worker process balloons up to 400MB, that pretty much goes out of the window”

MixedComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“The Ram used here is not for accelerating the user experience.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“when WhatsApp went from an Electron app to a native windows app it got decisively worse”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“I really don't understand why WhatsApp would need app especially with the state mentioned here”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“Don't they waste more resources vs. creating / fixing the gaps in the native app?”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“what makes this decision truly baffling is that they already had a UWP app”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Meta replaces WhatsApp for Windows with web wrapper”

“I’ve has it use 3-4 Gb when I had the channel with cat photos displayed for weeks.”

CriticizesComment from 12 Nov 2025 in “WhatsApp on Windows 11, now it opens WebView, uses 1GB RAM all the time”

“from a security and privacy standpoint there are only upsides”

MixedComment from 3 Nov 2025 in “Meta hints WhatsApp for Windows 11 will switch to a Chromium web app”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.