Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Textadept

Hacker Approved

Ranked 28 of 56 text editors by recommenders

A lightweight, mature text editor that is small and highly extensible in Lua, and a simpler option than Notepad++. Some users note friction from its platform-specific backends.

A lightweight, mature text editor that is small and highly extensible in Lua, and a simpler option than Notepad++. Some users note friction from its platform-specific backends.

14 people gave an opinion

recommend it
13
criticize it
1
approval share
93%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 5 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 13 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 13 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Extensible with Lua modules

    “The great thing about Textadept's extensibility (and use of Lua specifically) is that it's easy to pull in other Lua modules”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “it's intentionally kept very small, which means it's very easy to understand and extend”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “fast and lightweight and highly customizable with Lua”

    Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”
  • Lightweight and fast

    “It's very lightweight and mature, but its dependence on different backends on different platforms introduced some frictions”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “I downloaded it recently and found it to be quite useful for quick notes.”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “fast and lightweight and highly customizable with Lua”

    Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”
  • Small, easy to understand codebase

    “it's intentionally kept very small, which means it's very easy to understand and extend”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “keeping the LOC count really low (2000 lines of C, 4000 lines of Lua)”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

    “Textadept's codebase is a fine example.”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”
  • Simpler alternative to Notepad++

    “If you want an editor with the same core as Notepad++, but fewer batteries included and more extensibility, Textadept is worth a look.”

    Comment from 4 May 2026 in “Trademark Violation: Fake Notepad++ for Mac”

    “Searching for alternatives, Textadept seemed to fill the gap between features, speed and simplicity.”

    Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

Other text editors people recommend

The four most recommended other text editors, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Textadept compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Zed70043062%136 mo57 owners—
GNU Emacs64820776%1320 yrs158 ownersApproved
Vim51312780%1320 yrs55 ownersApproved
Visual Studio Code48554747%122 yrs13 owners—
TextadeptThis page13193%5—Approved
See all 56 text editors, ranked

What people said

17 of the 18 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Then I switched to textadept.”

RecommendsComment from 2 Sep 2026 in “Text editor written in C and Lua”

“If you want an editor with the same core as Notepad++, but fewer batteries included and more extensibility, Textadept is worth a look.”

RecommendsComment from 4 May 2026 in “Trademark Violation: Fake Notepad++ for Mac”

“I prefer to use TextAdept on Linux and Mac for notes anyway”

RecommendsComment from 27 Apr 2026 in “Notepad++ for Mac”

“it's intentionally kept very small, which means it's very easy to understand and extend”

MixedComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“The great thing about Textadept's extensibility (and use of Lua specifically) is that it's easy to pull in other Lua modules”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“Searching for alternatives, Textadept seemed to fill the gap between features, speed and simplicity.”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“having another option to demonstrate is excellent”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“It's very lightweight and mature, but its dependence on different backends on different platforms introduced some frictions”

MixedComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“probably same reasons lots of people ditch sublime after trying it for a day”

MixedComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“Apparent very high extensibility using lua”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“Nice. Im looking for such projects.”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“The splits functionality is one of its weaknesses right now IMO”

CriticizesComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“keeping the LOC count really low (2000 lines of C, 4000 lines of Lua)”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“I downloaded it recently and found it to be quite useful for quick notes.”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“Textadept's codebase is a fine example.”

RecommendsComment from 4 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“fast and lightweight and highly customizable with Lua”

MixedComment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Textadept”

“Textadept is lightweight, and more...”

RecommendsComment from 25 Feb 2026 in “Windows 11 Notepad to support Markdown”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.