Hacker ApprovedDepartments

GPT-5.3-Codex

Ranked 3 of 15 coding models by recommenders

A careful OpenAI coding model praised for long tasks, orchestration, verification and code review at good value; critics report silent routing to weaker models and robotic, hard-to-follow explanations.

A careful OpenAI coding model praised for long tasks, orchestration, verification and code review at good value; critics report silent routing to weaker models and robotic, hard-to-follow explanations.

213 people gave an opinion

recommend it
135
criticize it
78
approval share
63%
Each figure is 2 people. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 11 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Owned for 2 months

Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.

Each square is one year.

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 135 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 1.7 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Excellent overall coding ability

    “Since the performance of the latest models (Opus 4.6 max-effort, gpt-5.3-Codex) is nothing short of astonishing.”

    Comment from 14 Feb 2026 in “Zig – io_uring and Grand Central Dispatch std.Io implementations landed”

    “This is literally stuff of wonders and magic that redefines how we interface with computers and code.”

    Comment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

    “GPT 5.5 codex was shockingly good. Achieved 90% perfect on first try in about a fourth of the time.”

    Comment from 24 Apr 2026 in “OpenAI releases GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro in the API”
  • Handles long tasks and orchestration

    “Gpt-5.3-codex is miles better than 5.4 in that regard. It's better at orchestration, and does the things that it said it did.”

    Comment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Introducing GPT-5.5”

    “the Opus 4.5/4.6 and GPT-5.2/5.3 models really have represented a step-change in how good they are at running long tasks”

    Comment from 12 Feb 2026 in “GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark”

    “gave me the confidence to load in a ridiculous number of tasks every day and let it rip”

    Comment from 20 Feb 2026 in “Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview”
  • Careful, verifies and reviews code

    “Somehow it's just way more careful than the others, and also much better at empirical verification of its hypothesis, writing tests, etc.”

    Comment from 17 Jun 2026 in “GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis”

    “when GPT-5.3 Codex looked at it, it said that speaker A and speaker B were switched in the LoRA code”

    Comment from 5 Mar 2026 in “Nvidia PersonaPlex 7B on Apple Silicon: Full-Duplex Speech-to-Speech in Swift”

    “surprisingly adept at performing a high level feature branch review and catching issues”

    Comment from 21 Mar 2026 in “Ghostling”
  • Good value versus competitors

    “subjectively think it does better job than Opus 4.6/4.7, with a fraction of the cost”

    Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

    “its pricing is really good in production (due to how their token caching works)”

    Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

    “which has more than double context size, seems just as smart and costs the same”

    Comment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Claude Sonnet 4.6 System Card”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Reliability degradation over time

    “I have noticed this degradation of 5.5 reliability to what, in my experience, I consider Claude-level of reliability since early June.”

    Comment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

    “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering at 516/1034/1552 may be leading to degraded performance on complex tasks”

    Comment from 9 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.6”

    “occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result”

    Comment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”
  • Silently routed to weaker model

    “Pulling a switcheroo on the user behind the scenes, whatever the justification, is another issue”

    Comment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2”

    “getting their requests silently routed to a less capable model without telling the user at all”

    Comment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2”
  • Output often needs iteration

    “Some were definitely below par, and I recall having to iterate on the generated code more than I wanted to.”

    Comment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

    “I've run multiple gpt-5 codex concurrent sessions in the cloud, but I didn't accept one thing they did.”

    Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Building more with GPT-5.1-Codex-Max”

    “I'm not seeing this translating to useful code. It failed with the first few requests I gave it.”

    Comment from 12 Feb 2026 in “Ask HN: Why is everyone here so AI-hyped?”
  • Claims done without clarity

    “When I've used codex (it has been getting better) but back in the day it would just do things and say it's done and you're just sitting there wondering "wtf are you doing?"”

    Comment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

    “5.3 is good but talks like a robot, it’s too hard to understand what exactly it’s talking about.”

    Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

Other coding models people recommend

The four most recommended other coding models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

GPT-5.3-Codex compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Cursor Composer2147973%121 mo11 ownersApproved
Qwen3-Coder1654977%122 mo7 ownersApproved
GPT-5.3-CodexThis page1357863%112 mo4 owners—
Meta Muse Glimmer 30B701880%3——
GPT-5.2-Codex543362%4——
See all 15 coding models, ranked

What people said

40 of the 249 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering at 516/1034/1552 may be leading to degraded performance on complex tasks”

CriticizesComment from 9 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.6”

“Some were definitely below par, and I recall having to iterate on the generated code more than I wanted to.”

MixedComment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

“I have noticed this degradation of 5.5 reliability to what, in my experience, I consider Claude-level of reliability since early June.”

CriticizesComment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

“occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result”

CriticizesComment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

“same prompting style, same repository documentation ala MD files, same skills, way different results”

CriticizesComment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

“These stuck responses at fixed thresholds are strongly correlated with errors in complex tasks.”

CriticizesComment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”

“IMO somewhat weirdly 5.3-codex might be the best overall coding model OpenAI have ever released.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Sonnet 5”

“Somehow it's just way more careful than the others, and also much better at empirical verification of its hypothesis, writing tests, etc.”

RecommendsComment from 17 Jun 2026 in “GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis”

“5.3 is good but talks like a robot, it’s too hard to understand what exactly it’s talking about.”

MixedComment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

“subjectively think it does better job than Opus 4.6/4.7, with a fraction of the cost”

RecommendsComment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

“its pricing is really good in production (due to how their token caching works)”

RecommendsComment from 28 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”

“GPT 5.5 codex was shockingly good. Achieved 90% perfect on first try in about a fourth of the time.”

RecommendsComment from 24 Apr 2026 in “OpenAI releases GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro in the API”

“Gpt-5.3-codex is miles better than 5.4 in that regard. It's better at orchestration, and does the things that it said it did.”

RecommendsComment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Introducing GPT-5.5”

“is really good about patiently watching and waiting on external processes like CI”

RecommendsComment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Introducing GPT-5.5”

“5.3-codex was an improvement and 5.4 while _usually_ decent still regularly forgets, goes on unnecessary tangents”

MixedComment from 20 Apr 2026 in “Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual Plans”

“OpenAI's most recent GPT-5x codex model is better than Claude 5x for certain coding tasks”

RecommendsComment from 9 Apr 2026 in “Sam Altman May Control Our Future – Can He Be Trusted?”

“surprisingly adept at performing a high level feature branch review and catching issues”

MixedComment from 21 Mar 2026 in “Ghostling”

“after GPT 5.3-Codex xhigh reached an impasse it went looking for it and found it!”

RecommendsComment from 5 Mar 2026 in “Claude's Cycles: Claude Opus 4.6 solves a problem posed by Don Knuth [pdf]”

“when GPT-5.3 Codex looked at it, it said that speaker A and speaker B were switched in the LoRA code”

MixedComment from 5 Mar 2026 in “Nvidia PersonaPlex 7B on Apple Silicon: Full-Duplex Speech-to-Speech in Swift”

“it is providing working solutions on first go and following coding patterns that already exist in my app”

RecommendsComment from 26 Feb 2026 in “Why Developers Keep Choosing Claude over Every Other AI”

“I would personally be happy using gpt 5.3 codex for the foreseeable future, with just improvements in harnesses”

RecommendsComment from 24 Feb 2026 in “AI Added 'Basically Zero' to US Economic Growth Last Year, Goldman Sachs Says”

“Works well in both. My only complain is that it tends to get stutters after many sessions/hours.”

MixedComment from 21 Feb 2026 in “When Code is Free, Why is Claude is an Electron app?”

“gave me the confidence to load in a ridiculous number of tasks every day and let it rip”

RecommendsComment from 20 Feb 2026 in “Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview”

“which has more than double context size, seems just as smart and costs the same”

RecommendsComment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Claude Sonnet 4.6 System Card”

“it's just so insanely good in almost everything else that I can look past these flaws”

MixedComment from 16 Feb 2026 in “OpenClaw, OpenAI and the Future”

“Since the performance of the latest models (Opus 4.6 max-effort, gpt-5.3-Codex) is nothing short of astonishing.”

RecommendsComment from 14 Feb 2026 in “Zig – io_uring and Grand Central Dispatch std.Io implementations landed”

“the Opus 4.5/4.6 and GPT-5.2/5.3 models really have represented a step-change in how good they are at running long tasks”

RecommendsComment from 12 Feb 2026 in “GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark”

“I'm not seeing this translating to useful code. It failed with the first few requests I gave it.”

CriticizesComment from 12 Feb 2026 in “Ask HN: Why is everyone here so AI-hyped?”

“getting their requests silently routed to a less capable model without telling the user at all”

CriticizesComment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2”

“Pulling a switcheroo on the user behind the scenes, whatever the justification, is another issue”

CriticizesComment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2”

“I have found GPT 5.3-Codex to do exceedingly well when working with graphics rendering pipelines.”

RecommendsComment from 6 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

“When I've used codex (it has been getting better) but back in the day it would just do things and say it's done and you're just sitting there wondering "wtf are you doing?"”

CriticizesComment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

“This is literally stuff of wonders and magic that redefines how we interface with computers and code.”

RecommendsComment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

“Impressive jump for GPT-5.3-codex and crazy to see two top coding models come out on the same day”

RecommendsComment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”

“another model (preferably with a fresh session) can be a very effective peer reviewer”

RecommendsComment from 18 Jan 2026 in “Flux 2 Klein pure C inference”

“gpt codex 5.1 recently has been making a lot of typescript for me that is basically production ready”

RecommendsComment from 8 Dec 2025 in “I failed to recreate the 1996 Space Jam website with Claude”

“I've run multiple gpt-5 codex concurrent sessions in the cloud, but I didn't accept one thing they did.”

CriticizesComment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Building more with GPT-5.1-Codex-Max”

“GPT-5-Codex via OpenAI Codex CLi on Linux/WSL was, for me, the most capable model for coding”

RecommendsComment from 11 Nov 2025 in “Vibe Code Warning – A personal casestudy”

“The latter is firmly preferred even by those who have no issue with budgeting tokens for their productivity.”

RecommendsComment from 9 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5-Codex-Mini – A more compact and cost-efficient version of GPT-5-Codex”

“The newer models are quite capable and in my experience can largely be treated like a co-worker for "most" problems.”

RecommendsComment from 1 Nov 2025 in “Claude Code can debug low-level cryptography”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.