GPT-5.3-Codex
Ranked 3 of 15 coding models by recommenders
A careful OpenAI coding model praised for long tasks, orchestration, verification and code review at good value; critics report silent routing to weaker models and robotic, hard-to-follow explanations.
A careful OpenAI coding model praised for long tasks, orchestration, verification and code review at good value; critics report silent routing to weaker models and robotic, hard-to-follow explanations.
213 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 135
- criticize it
- 78
- approval share
- 63%
Recommended in 11 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: not recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 2 months
Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 135 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.7 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Excellent overall coding ability
“Since the performance of the latest models (Opus 4.6 max-effort, gpt-5.3-Codex) is nothing short of astonishing.”
Comment from 14 Feb 2026 in “Zig – io_uring and Grand Central Dispatch std.Io implementations landed” “This is literally stuff of wonders and magic that redefines how we interface with computers and code.”
Comment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex” “GPT 5.5 codex was shockingly good. Achieved 90% perfect on first try in about a fourth of the time.”
Comment from 24 Apr 2026 in “OpenAI releases GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro in the API” - Comment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex”
- Comment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Sonnet 5”
- Comment from 11 Nov 2025 in “Vibe Code Warning – A personal casestudy”
- Comment from 9 Apr 2026 in “Sam Altman May Control Our Future – Can He Be Trusted?”
- Comment from 16 Feb 2026 in “OpenClaw, OpenAI and the Future”
Handles long tasks and orchestration
“Gpt-5.3-codex is miles better than 5.4 in that regard. It's better at orchestration, and does the things that it said it did.”
Comment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Introducing GPT-5.5” “the Opus 4.5/4.6 and GPT-5.2/5.3 models really have represented a step-change in how good they are at running long tasks”
Comment from 12 Feb 2026 in “GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark” “gave me the confidence to load in a ridiculous number of tasks every day and let it rip”
Comment from 20 Feb 2026 in “Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview” - Comment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Introducing GPT-5.5”
Careful, verifies and reviews code
“Somehow it's just way more careful than the others, and also much better at empirical verification of its hypothesis, writing tests, etc.”
Comment from 17 Jun 2026 in “GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis” “when GPT-5.3 Codex looked at it, it said that speaker A and speaker B were switched in the LoRA code”
Comment from 5 Mar 2026 in “Nvidia PersonaPlex 7B on Apple Silicon: Full-Duplex Speech-to-Speech in Swift” “surprisingly adept at performing a high level feature branch review and catching issues”
Comment from 21 Mar 2026 in “Ghostling” - Comment from 18 Jan 2026 in “Flux 2 Klein pure C inference”
- Comment from 5 Mar 2026 in “Claude's Cycles: Claude Opus 4.6 solves a problem posed by Don Knuth [pdf]”
Good value versus competitors
“subjectively think it does better job than Opus 4.6/4.7, with a fraction of the cost”
Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8” “its pricing is really good in production (due to how their token caching works)”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8” “which has more than double context size, seems just as smart and costs the same”
Comment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Claude Sonnet 4.6 System Card”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Reliability degradation over time
“I have noticed this degradation of 5.5 reliability to what, in my experience, I consider Claude-level of reliability since early June.”
Comment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance” “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering at 516/1034/1552 may be leading to degraded performance on complex tasks”
Comment from 9 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.6” “occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result”
Comment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance” - Comment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”
- Comment from 4 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance”
Silently routed to weaker model
“Pulling a switcheroo on the user behind the scenes, whatever the justification, is another issue”
Comment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2” “getting their requests silently routed to a less capable model without telling the user at all”
Comment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex being routed to GPT-5.2” Output often needs iteration
“Some were definitely below par, and I recall having to iterate on the generated code more than I wanted to.”
Comment from 5 Jul 2026 in “GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance” “I've run multiple gpt-5 codex concurrent sessions in the cloud, but I didn't accept one thing they did.”
Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Building more with GPT-5.1-Codex-Max” “I'm not seeing this translating to useful code. It failed with the first few requests I gave it.”
Comment from 12 Feb 2026 in “Ask HN: Why is everyone here so AI-hyped?” Claims done without clarity
“When I've used codex (it has been getting better) but back in the day it would just do things and say it's done and you're just sitting there wondering "wtf are you doing?"”
Comment from 5 Feb 2026 in “GPT-5.3-Codex” “5.3 is good but talks like a robot, it’s too hard to understand what exactly it’s talking about.”
Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Claude Opus 4.8”
Other coding models people recommend
The four most recommended other coding models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor Composer | 214 | 79 | 73% | 12 | 1 mo11 owners | Approved |
| Qwen3-Coder | 165 | 49 | 77% | 12 | 2 mo7 owners | Approved |
| GPT-5.3-CodexThis page | 135 | 78 | 63% | 11 | 2 mo4 owners | — |
| Meta Muse Glimmer 30B | 70 | 18 | 80% | 3 | — | — |
| GPT-5.2-Codex | 54 | 33 | 62% | 4 | — | — |
What people said
40 of the 249 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering at 516/1034/1552 may be leading to degraded performance on complex tasks”
“Some were definitely below par, and I recall having to iterate on the generated code more than I wanted to.”
“I have noticed this degradation of 5.5 reliability to what, in my experience, I consider Claude-level of reliability since early June.”
“occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result”
“same prompting style, same repository documentation ala MD files, same skills, way different results”
“These stuck responses at fixed thresholds are strongly correlated with errors in complex tasks.”
“IMO somewhat weirdly 5.3-codex might be the best overall coding model OpenAI have ever released.”
“Somehow it's just way more careful than the others, and also much better at empirical verification of its hypothesis, writing tests, etc.”
“5.3 is good but talks like a robot, it’s too hard to understand what exactly it’s talking about.”
“subjectively think it does better job than Opus 4.6/4.7, with a fraction of the cost”
“its pricing is really good in production (due to how their token caching works)”
“GPT 5.5 codex was shockingly good. Achieved 90% perfect on first try in about a fourth of the time.”
“Gpt-5.3-codex is miles better than 5.4 in that regard. It's better at orchestration, and does the things that it said it did.”
“is really good about patiently watching and waiting on external processes like CI”
“5.3-codex was an improvement and 5.4 while _usually_ decent still regularly forgets, goes on unnecessary tangents”
“OpenAI's most recent GPT-5x codex model is better than Claude 5x for certain coding tasks”
“surprisingly adept at performing a high level feature branch review and catching issues”
“after GPT 5.3-Codex xhigh reached an impasse it went looking for it and found it!”
“when GPT-5.3 Codex looked at it, it said that speaker A and speaker B were switched in the LoRA code”
“it is providing working solutions on first go and following coding patterns that already exist in my app”
“I would personally be happy using gpt 5.3 codex for the foreseeable future, with just improvements in harnesses”
“Works well in both. My only complain is that it tends to get stutters after many sessions/hours.”
“gave me the confidence to load in a ridiculous number of tasks every day and let it rip”
“which has more than double context size, seems just as smart and costs the same”
“it's just so insanely good in almost everything else that I can look past these flaws”
“Since the performance of the latest models (Opus 4.6 max-effort, gpt-5.3-Codex) is nothing short of astonishing.”
“the Opus 4.5/4.6 and GPT-5.2/5.3 models really have represented a step-change in how good they are at running long tasks”
“I'm not seeing this translating to useful code. It failed with the first few requests I gave it.”
“getting their requests silently routed to a less capable model without telling the user at all”
“Pulling a switcheroo on the user behind the scenes, whatever the justification, is another issue”
“I have found GPT 5.3-Codex to do exceedingly well when working with graphics rendering pipelines.”
“When I've used codex (it has been getting better) but back in the day it would just do things and say it's done and you're just sitting there wondering "wtf are you doing?"”
“This is literally stuff of wonders and magic that redefines how we interface with computers and code.”
“Impressive jump for GPT-5.3-codex and crazy to see two top coding models come out on the same day”
“another model (preferably with a fresh session) can be a very effective peer reviewer”
“gpt codex 5.1 recently has been making a lot of typescript for me that is basically production ready”
“I've run multiple gpt-5 codex concurrent sessions in the cloud, but I didn't accept one thing they did.”
“GPT-5-Codex via OpenAI Codex CLi on Linux/WSL was, for me, the most capable model for coding”
“The latter is firmly preferred even by those who have no issue with budgeting tokens for their productivity.”
“The newer models are quite capable and in my experience can largely be treated like a co-worker for "most" problems.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.