Flatpak
The most recommended of 3 packaging formats
Recommended for installing up-to-date Linux desktop apps on any distro from one package with user-controllable sandbox permissions, though critics call the sandbox weak and permissions awkward to manage.
Recommended for installing up-to-date Linux desktop apps on any distro from one package with user-controllable sandbox permissions, though critics call the sandbox weak and permissions awkward to manage.
327 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 181
- criticize it
- 146
- approval share
- 55%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 181 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Sandboxing and app isolation
“Flatpaks, from the source if available, are excellent: you get the latest versions of the app from the official source, with permissions set for a pretty locked-down sandbox.”
Comment from 3 Nov 2025 in “Using FreeBSD to make self-hosting fun again” “You can trivially sandbox your Steam installation with pretty much zero performance overhead, if you install it through Flatpak.”
Comment from 2 Nov 2025 in “Linux gamers on Steam cross over the 3% mark” “Flatpak seems to be a neat advancement, at least in regard to stopping things from basically uploading your filesystems”
Comment from 2 Jan 2026 in “Linux is good now; to feel like you actually own your PC, put Linux on it” - Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “SmartTube Compromised”
- Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Android/Linux Dual Boot”
- Comment from 9 Jan 2026 in “What Happened to WebAssembly”
- Comment from 24 Jan 2026 in “Microsoft gave FBI set of BitLocker encryption keys to unlock suspects' laptops”
- Comment from 5 Apr 2026 in “GabeN Is Shitting Yacht Money into Flatpak and You're Still Arguing Init Systems”
- Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak”
Works across Linux distros
“Flatpak gives me cross-platform/cross-distro software directly/certified by the project or company that has additional security sandboxing”
Comment from 1 May 2026 in “Canonical/Ubuntu have been under DDoS for more than 15h” “I know it's has its rough edges, but I use many apps across arch/Fedora/Ubuntu that are delivered as a single flatpak”
Comment from 7 Jun 2026 in “Anthropic, please ship an official Claude Desktop for Linux” “The Windows way, used by Flatpak and Snap, of targetting known-good sets of libraries will work around that.”
Comment from 8 Aug 2026 in “As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program” - Comment from 22 Aug 2026 in “hdiutil is deprecated in macOS 27 Golden Gate”
- Comment from 27 Jan 2026 in “The C-Shaped Hole in Package Management”
- Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak”
- Comment from 30 Jan 2026 in “GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it works on a native client”
- Comment from 15 Oct 2026 in “Ubuntu 26.10 (Stonking Stingray) released”
User controls app permissions
“things like Flatpak give me, the user, the power over application's permissions and I can take them away (or give more) in a few taps at will”
Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Android/Linux Dual Boot” “the user has recourse: you can globally block all installed flatpaks from having access to a specific resource”
Comment from 16 Dec 2025 in “Problems with D-Bus on the Linux desktop” “Flathub is very explicit and obnoxious about such unsafe permissions and can easily be modified by the user.”
Comment from 16 Dec 2025 in “Problems with D-Bus on the Linux desktop” Latest apps from official sources
“Flatpaks, from the source if available, are excellent: you get the latest versions of the app from the official source, with permissions set for a pretty locked-down sandbox.”
Comment from 3 Nov 2025 in “Using FreeBSD to make self-hosting fun again” “Flatpak gives me cross-platform/cross-distro software directly/certified by the project or company that has additional security sandboxing”
Comment from 1 May 2026 in “Canonical/Ubuntu have been under DDoS for more than 15h” “I know I've noticed a big uplift in stability by using a rolling release base, or Flatpak if stuck on "stable".”
Comment from 19 Apr 2026 in “State of Kdenlive” - Comment from 2 Dec 2025 in “After Windows Update, Password icon invisible, click where it used to be”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Weak or leaky sandbox
“Flatpak isn't a proper sandbox due to it not being fine-grained, not being properly run-time based and having numerous sandbox escape possibilities.”
Comment from 28 Oct 2026 in “The Advantages of Mobile Linux over AOSP (LineageOS, CrDroid, GrapheneOS, etc.)” “Flatpak is just a cheap container copy. Can't do anything beyond what cgroups and things like apparmor and selinux can do”
Comment from 30 Aug 2026 in “Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root” Clunky permission management
“Isolating individual apps and having to deal with permission prompts and protals, and persistence of permissions is uh, not very user friendly anyway.”
Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak” “it's technically implemented uniformely without thought of user access patterns, then yes it's a bad idea causing friction and frustration”
Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak” “That is actually very poor design that a user requires a separate app (flatseal) to configure how the sandbox works.”
Comment from 22 Jun 2026 in “window.showDirectoryPicker opens up a whole new world” - Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “Sovereign Tech Agency invests €500k in Flatpak”
Graphics driver and runtime issues
“I especially love how flatpak has its own version of graphics drivers, which results in my browser flatpak updating to a version that has a mismatch”
Comment from 20 Apr 2026 in “OpenClaw isn't fooling me. I remember MS-DOS” “all the machinations that Flatpak goes through to get userspace Mesa drivers etc. working on a different glibc version than the base system”
Comment from 5 Jan 2026 in “Win32 is the stable Linux ABI” “Flatpak steam runs like poo for a lot of people. Really, flatpak should be avoided if there are other installation methods”
Comment from 2 Nov 2025 in “Linux gamers on Steam cross over the 3% mark”
Other packaging formats people recommend
The two most recommended other packaging formats, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 3 packaging formats, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 411 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“Flatpak isn't a proper sandbox due to it not being fine-grained, not being properly run-time based and having numerous sandbox escape possibilities.”
“the distro matters a lot less if you use containers or flatpaks for most things (which I'd recommend)”
“The Flatpak project gets panned all the time. Not for having a weak sandbox (which would be a fair criticism), but for having a sandbox at all”
“I've barely ever had a problem with them, and the problems I did have were solvable with a cursory web search.”
“Flatpak is just a cheap container copy. Can't do anything beyond what cgroups and things like apparmor and selinux can do”
“making it possible for software to incorporate these new granular permissions in a backwards compatible manner”
“Isolating individual apps and having to deal with permission prompts and protals, and persistence of permissions is uh, not very user friendly anyway.”
“it's technically implemented uniformely without thought of user access patterns, then yes it's a bad idea causing friction and frustration”
“Flatpak itself might not survive, but the underlying protocols are relevant for sandboxing on linux as a whole.”
“had to use `--sandbox` with every app and then carefully engineer the permissions so the apps would actually work”
“works way better than any other package system on Linux when it comes to security and distro independence”
“It's trivial to use containerization technologies like flatpak to get software to run on any Linux distro.”
“The Windows way, used by Flatpak and Snap, of targetting known-good sets of libraries will work around that.”
“That is actually very poor design that a user requires a separate app (flatseal) to configure how the sandbox works.”
“I know it's has its rough edges, but I use many apps across arch/Fedora/Ubuntu that are delivered as a single flatpak”
“Now the direction changed with the new team/leadership towards integration, security and control instead of "it works everywhere".”
“Flatpak gives me cross-platform/cross-distro software directly/certified by the project or company that has additional security sandboxing”
“I especially love how flatpak has its own version of graphics drivers, which results in my browser flatpak updating to a version that has a mismatch”
“I know I've noticed a big uplift in stability by using a rolling release base, or Flatpak if stuck on "stable".”
“Flatpak gives me one package to install and a little bit of a minor security boundary around the application.”
“the UX for that is such that most Flatpak non-power-users aren't enforcing sandboxing on Flatpaks they install”
“So you never get stupid popups, and update managers use signed packages and check those signatures before installation.”
“They could at least use Flatpak and containers instead of choosing a given distro or package manager.”
“you could avoid having to think about distro package managers by distributing with something like flatpak”
“Ability to deploy user applications using something like Flatpak which ensures they are used within a sandbox”
“Everybody (except Ubuntu) is pushing for it, from the regular desktop distros like Feodra all the way to image based distros like KDE Linux and Fedora Silverblue.”
“provide a rich but controllable set of features, API/ABI compatibility, while providing zero overhead isolation”
“all the machinations that Flatpak goes through to get userspace Mesa drivers etc. working on a different glibc version than the base system”
“Flatpak seems to be a neat advancement, at least in regard to stopping things from basically uploading your filesystems”
“the user has recourse: you can globally block all installed flatpaks from having access to a specific resource”
“Flathub is very explicit and obnoxious about such unsafe permissions and can easily be modified by the user.”
“Which is how Flatpak does it and you sideline the entire problem of having to authenticate clients on the bus”
“flatpak (available as a slackbuild) allows you to easily install apps you would have had to compile yourself”
“With such security technology existing, giving every application full access to the system is no longer appropriate.”
“things like Flatpak give me, the user, the power over application's permissions and I can take them away (or give more) in a few taps at will”
“where you'd run something untrusted there you'd use Flatpak or something similar where what you wrote doesn't apply”
“Flatpaks, from the source if available, are excellent: you get the latest versions of the app from the official source, with permissions set for a pretty locked-down sandbox.”
“Flatpak steam runs like poo for a lot of people. Really, flatpak should be avoided if there are other installation methods”
“Flatpak is fine for user GUI apps but I don't think it would be feasible to e.g. distribute Rust via a Flatpak.”
“You can trivially sandbox your Steam installation with pretty much zero performance overhead, if you install it through Flatpak.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.