Hacker ApprovedDepartments

xcc C compiler

Shares rank 12 of 18 c compilers by recommenders

People recommend xcc as a fast, readable C compiler that runs standard C code with no changes, and find it cool and useful. No criticism was recorded.

People recommend xcc as a fast, readable C compiler that runs standard C code with no changes, and find it cool and useful. No criticism was recorded.

8 people gave an opinion

recommend it
8
criticize it
0
approval share
100%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 4 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 8 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Fast on plain C code

    “Those are some pretty fine speedups, from naive C, with no alterations from the standard "C" code”

    Comment from 19 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

    “worth mentioning for being fast-enough to run C like scripting”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “C, Just In Time!”
  • Seen as cool and useful

    “I think your project is both cool and potentially very useful and I'm glad you mentioned it on HN!”

    Comment from 21 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

    “I like it! The Rust crew would love this I bet.”

    Comment from 19 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

Other c compilers people recommend

The four most recommended other c compilers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

xcc C compiler compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Fil-C1606073%13—Approved
Claude's C Compiler398332%5——
Visual C++291763%12——
Tiny C Compiler (TCC)22388%9—Approved
xcc C compilerThis page80100%4——
See all 18 c compilers, ranked

What people said

7 of the 8 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“I think your project is both cool and potentially very useful and I'm glad you mentioned it on HN!”

RecommendsComment from 21 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

“I like it! The Rust crew would love this I bet.”

RecommendsComment from 19 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

“Those are some pretty fine speedups, from naive C, with no alterations from the standard "C" code”

RecommendsComment from 19 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: How to deal with shipping AI-written code you don't understand?”

“worth mentioning for being fast-enough to run C like scripting”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “C, Just In Time!”

“really easy to read and well written and easy to comprehend code”

RecommendsComment from 26 Dec 2025 in “Show HN: Xcc700: Self-hosting mini C compiler for ESP32 (Xtensa) in 700 lines”

“I do think the world needs more C compilers”

RecommendsComment from 26 Dec 2025 in “Show HN: Xcc700: Self-hosting mini C compiler for ESP32 (Xtensa) in 700 lines”

“I built the playground for my language using that”

RecommendsComment from 7 Nov 2025 in “A Note on Fil-C”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.