Skip to content

Learning · online guide

Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing

Hacker Approved

A free Wikipedia guide to common patterns in LLM-written text, praised for going well beyond the em-dash rule. Some say it is fallible in the long run.

Summarized from 35 comments.

A free Wikipedia guide to common patterns in LLM-written text, praised for going well beyond the em-dash rule. Some say it is fallible in the long run.

recommend
34
criticize
0
months recommended
10 of 13

Why people love it

  • Covers many common LLM writing patterns · 5

    Wikipedia also has a great resource which covers many of the common LLM patterns

    May 2026 · comment

    There's a Wikipedia article with a nice list of LLM writing patterns

    Apr 2026 · comment

    the article in general covers a lot of AI writing styles

    Dec 2025 · comment
  • Helps spot AI-generated text · 4

    The Wikipedia article on detecting AI writing is a big help if you need to calibrate your sensors

    Feb 2026 · comment

    is a good starting point. You start seeing patterns at some point.

    Feb 2026 · comment

    everyone who is sick of reading generated text should read this

    Jan 2026 · comment
  • Human-written, well-documented, maintained resource · 4

    Wikipedia's article "Signs of AI Writing" is a good read

    Apr 2026 · comment

    Wikipedia has an excellent article about exactly this

    Mar 2026 · comment

    a human-generated (and maintained) list

    Feb 2026 · comment
  • Useful for improving your own writing · 4

    Wikipedia also has an exhaustive guide, though it's not fun finding tropes you use yourself

    Mar 2026 · comment

    you can also detect yourself doing these same things sometimes, and fix them

    Feb 2026 · comment

    This article on wiki has fantastic advice about ways that LLM writing fails

    Nov 2025 · comment

What hackers pick instead

Every quote

The 30 most detailed of 35 comments. Each links to the original.

  1. The Wikipedia article on detecting AI writing is a big help if you need to calibrate your sensors

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “The Most-Seen UI on the Internet? Redesigning Turnstile and Challenge Pages”

  2. Wikipedia also has an exhaustive guide, though it's not fun finding tropes you use yourself

    Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “LLM Writing Tropes.md”

  3. Wikipedia also has a great resource which covers many of the common LLM patterns

    Recommends · May 2026 · in “Various LLM Smells”

  4. you can also detect yourself doing these same things sometimes, and fix them

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “Why AI writing is so generic, boring, and dangerous: Semantic ablation”

  5. This article on wiki has fantastic advice about ways that LLM writing fails

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “Show HN: Build the habit of writing meaningful commit messages”

  6. There's a Wikipedia article with a nice list of LLM writing patterns

    Recommends · Apr 2026 · in “Arguing with Agents”

  7. is a good starting point. You start seeing patterns at some point.

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “The Engine Behind the Hype”

  8. very useful in writing skills to help avoid these kinds of issues

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “/Deslop”

  9. everyone who is sick of reading generated text should read this

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup”

  10. the article in general covers a lot of AI writing styles

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “ManusAI Joins Meta”

  11. Wikipedia's article "Signs of AI Writing" is a good read

    Recommends · Apr 2026 · in “ChatGPT's latest stylistic quirk is sinister, infuriating – and everywhere”

  12. Wikipedia has an excellent article about exactly this

    Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “What 81,000 people want from AI”

  13. Wikipedia has a great guideline on spotting AI text

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “Slop Detective – Fight the Slop Syndicate”

  14. a human-generated (and maintained) list

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “/Deslop”

  15. well-documented patterns by Wikipedia

    Recommends · May 2026 · in “Various LLM Smells”

  16. A substantive human-written resource

    Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “LLM Writing Tropes.md”

  17. Wikipedia has a great list

    Recommends · May 2026 · in “Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country”

  18. very interesting and informative. It goes into a lot more detail than the typical "em-dashes" heuristic.

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup”

  19. a much better explanation and arguments for not immediately blaming someone for using ai

    Recommends · Jun 2026 · in “It's Not Just X. It's Y”

  20. This is very good, but I'm surprised the term "game-changer" is not mentioned there.

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup”

  21. I think they are good resources, but fallible in the long run.

    Mixed · Mar 2026 · in “The first 40 months of the AI era”

  22. Here's an article on llmisms from people on the front lines.

    Recommends · Jul 2026

  23. The wikipedia page Signs of AI Writing is quite a good one

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Claude's New Constitution”

  24. This is a handy resources - for humans and for bots

    Recommends · Apr 2026 · in “Ask HN: How do systems (or people) detect when a text is written by an LLM”

  25. Wikipedia also has an exhaustive guide

    Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “LLM Writing Tropes.md”

  26. The best resource i’ve seen on this

    Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “How to Spot AI Writing”

  27. The actually useful tips are here

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “AI Employees Don't Pay Taxes”

  28. You might find this a fun read

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Why does SSH send 100 packets per keystroke?”

  29. a great link to share around !

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “AI-generated replies really are a scourge these days”

  30. Thanks for the Wikipedia tip.

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “The Most-Seen UI on the Internet? Redesigning Turnstile and Challenge Pages”

Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake