Hacker ApprovedDepartments

vim.pack

Shares rank 6 of 7 Vim plugins by recommenders

Neovim's built-in plugin manager, liked for its simple vim.pack.add({url}) interface and for being built in. Common caveat: setups get verbose when replicating lazy-loading features.

Neovim's built-in plugin manager, liked for its simple vim.pack.add({url}) interface and for being built in. Common caveat: setups get verbose when replicating lazy-loading features.

9 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
criticize it
4
approval share
56%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 2 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 1.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 2 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Verbose configuration

    “there's some verbosity to bear with”

    Comment from 30 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

    “If you want to replicate the lazy features then it will get verbose”

    Comment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

    “I was not happy with it because how verbose it turned out”

    Comment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”
  • Lockfile gets out of sync

    “pack's lockfile kept getting out of sync, and pack didn't handle it well and sometimes even crashed”

    Comment from 23 May 2026 in “Lisp in Vim (2019)”

    “pack's lockfile kept getting out of sync”

    Comment from 23 May 2026 in “Lisp in Vim (2019)”

Other Vim plugins people recommend

The four most recommended other Vim plugins, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

vim.pack compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
vim-fugitive100100%5—Approved
IdeaVim90100%6——
Sidekick.nvim90100%6——
lazy.nvim8189%2——
vim.packThis page5456%2——
See all 7 Vim plugins, ranked

What people said

All 10 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“pack's lockfile kept getting out of sync, and pack didn't handle it well and sometimes even crashed”

CriticizesComment from 23 May 2026 in “Lisp in Vim (2019)”

“pack's lockfile kept getting out of sync”

CriticizesComment from 23 May 2026 in “Lisp in Vim (2019)”

“using vim.packs unused `data` for config merging and it works well enough”

MixedComment from 23 May 2026 in “Lisp in Vim (2019)”

“there's some verbosity to bear with”

MixedComment from 30 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“I'd guess if you don't care about lazy loading and OK with just loading everything all the time - vim.pack is great to have.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“If you want to replicate the lazy features then it will get verbose”

CriticizesComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“The new plugin manager's interface is literature just vim.pack.add({url})”

RecommendsComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“Tried to switch but found lazy.nvim better”

CriticizesComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“It being built in sounds nice”

RecommendsComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

“I was not happy with it because how verbose it turned out”

CriticizesComment from 29 Mar 2026 in “Neovim 0.12.0”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.