Tangled
Hacker ApprovedRanked 6 of 22 git forges by recommenders
A federated GitHub alternative built on AT Protocol, with portable identity and easy self-hosted git servers (knots); critics worry about VC funding and the lack of private repos.
A federated GitHub alternative built on AT Protocol, with portable identity and easy self-hosted git servers (knots); critics worry about VC funding and the lack of private repos.
184 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 127
- criticize it
- 57
- approval share
- 69%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 1 month
Median of the 3 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it carries the badge
- 127 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Easy self-hosted knots you control
“Being able to host my git repos as a headless, data-only server is about as painless as self-hosting can get.”
Comment from 13 May 2026 in “Why I'm leaving GitHub for Forgejo” “am loving it, not least of which is that my git server (a 'knot' in Tangled parlance) is under my control”
Comment from 18 Jan 2026 in “A Social Filesystem” “Self-host your knots, AT Protocol for identities, and an "indexer" at tangled.org (easily replaced).”
Comment from 18 Jun 2026 in “The Forge We Deserve” - Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub”
- Comment from 12 May 2026 in “GitLab Announces Workforce Reduction and End of Their CREDIT Values”
- Comment from 4 May 2026 in “Days Without GitHub Incidents”
- Comment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Incident with Multple GitHub Services”
Federated, decentralized via AT Protocol
“tangled knots actually federate. you could contribute to repos on knot.ghostty.org and knot.tangled.org with the same account.”
Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub” “Tangled by making use of the atproto replicates much of this functionality. While also allowing people to run their own nodes”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “GitHub down again? no PR access” “the AT protocol means that any individual forge can go down, but the data remains accessible from other AppViews”
Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges” - Comment from 6 May 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub”
- Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “An Update on GitHub Availability”
- Comment from 1 Aug 2026 in “GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement”
Portable identity across platforms
“You have one identity (on a PDS somewhere, optionally self-hosted) which you use to interact with any tangled repository”
Comment from 24 Dec 2025 in “My 2026 Open Social Web Predictions” “built on the same protocol as bluesky, meaning your identity is preserved across different platforms”
Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” Resilient if host or company disappears
“Tangled is far from feature complete but I like the direction and it probably is a bit more resilient against global outages like this.”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “GitHub down again? no PR access” “the AT protocol means that any individual forge can go down, but the data remains accessible from other AppViews”
Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges” “It's built on ATProto, so even if the company disappears, all of the integration and features will still work”
Comment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
VC funding raises rug-pull fears
“How can they ever see a dollar of profit without a rug pull, license change or hosted moat?”
Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges” “until they announced they sought and got VC investments, which makes it not even worth looking into for long-term projects”
Comment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Dutch governments builds alternative for Microsoft based on NixOS” “Why should we spend our time on a developer tool that would be enshittified down the line when VCs expect 10x returns?”
Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges” - Comment from 2 Mar 2026 in “Tangled: Our €3,8M seed round”
- Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges”
- Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges”
No private repositories
“Both Radicle and Tangled miss the point; these are all for public collaborative work, but what about private repos?”
Comment from 1 May 2026 in “If I Could Make My Own GitHub” “No private repositories (because everything is on ATProto) so near zero commercial use potential”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub” Self-hosting knots has rough edges
“I did try to get some of my git repos on Tangled.org just today, and alas found that the actual git data needs a "knit" server to do that.”
Comment from 25 Dec 2025 in “My 2026 Open Social Web Predictions” “I've had some performance issues and some technical ones with hosting my own 'knot' and 'spindle' services”
Comment from 29 Aug 2026 in “Bye, Bye GitHub” “Tangled is forcing some of their particular technologies (nix/rust) on users for those pieces and that is a hard sell.”
Comment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative” Odd federation model, centralized indexer
“As far as I know only Tangled actually supports it, but unfortunately Tangled is tangled up in its own weird federation ideas.”
Comment from 5 Dec 2025 in “Stacked Diffs with git rebase —onto” “in practice it is centralized: you can host your own PDS and knot but if tangled.org decides you don’t align with their values then they stop indexing you”
Comment from 8 Aug 2026 in “GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement” “you’re tied to both tangled (unless you want to self host a forge, which if you did you wouldn’t have picked tabgled)”
Comment from 18 Jul 2026 in “Gleam Is Now on Tangled”
Other git forges people recommend
The four most recommended other git forges, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 22 git forges, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 298 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“until they announced they sought and got VC investments, which makes it not even worth looking into for long-term projects”
“I've had some performance issues and some technical ones with hosting my own 'knot' and 'spindle' services”
“I think tangled is just not for you since the ATProto model is for open data and so fits open source projects really nicely”
“Tangled is forcing some of their particular technologies (nix/rust) on users for those pieces and that is a hard sell.”
“It's built on ATProto, so even if the company disappears, all of the integration and features will still work”
“Tangled by making use of the atproto replicates much of this functionality. While also allowing people to run their own nodes”
“No private repositories (because everything is on ATProto) so near zero commercial use potential”
“mean that a competitor could come in easily if you were no longer satisfied with performance, reliability, or monetization.”
“Tangled is far from feature complete but I like the direction and it probably is a bit more resilient against global outages like this.”
“in practice it is centralized: you can host your own PDS and knot but if tangled.org decides you don’t align with their values then they stop indexing you”
“It's the first take on challenging Github as a social network for developers that I've seen that might actually work.”
“as long the tech is open (it is) and as far as I can discern it is federated and decentralized”
“actually wants to be a general-purpose decentralized GitHub competitor for the long run, and seems to be much more dependable”
“I like the idea at a high-level, though it remains to be seen how well code hosting fits into the AT Proto model.”
“you’re tied to both tangled (unless you want to self host a forge, which if you did you wouldn’t have picked tabgled)”
“Self-host your knots, AT Protocol for identities, and an "indexer" at tangled.org (easily replaced).”
“Being able to host my git repos as a headless, data-only server is about as painless as self-hosting can get.”
“it's a bit fun to host your own Knot and Spindle servers but still connect to a full social graph”
“without the reliance on a single host provider/instance like GitHub/GitLab/whatever as a single point of failure”
“Much more convenient that hosting an entire, siloed webapp on my own corner of the internet.”
“Both Radicle and Tangled miss the point; these are all for public collaborative work, but what about private repos?”
“the AT protocol means that any individual forge can go down, but the data remains accessible from other AppViews”
“The problem with VC-funded projects is that there is definitely going to be some kind of rug-pull.”
“As long as they don't make it hard to move off their platform, IMO it's completely fine for them to try different monetization models.”
“How can they ever see a dollar of profit without a rug pull, license change or hosted moat?”
“Why should we spend our time on a developer tool that would be enshittified down the line when VCs expect 10x returns?”
“Tangled is VC sponsored. It doesn't scream stability to me, but rather "we need to grow at all cost".”
“Tried tangled, quite like the idea! The fact you can always switch to a self-hosted knot is nice.”
“tangled knots actually federate. you could contribute to repos on knot.ghostty.org and knot.tangled.org with the same account.”
“the future really should be federated forges. Host repositories on sovereign infra with global identity”
“its got the self-hostability that cgit/forgejo does and a the social bits that github does”
“As soon as you take money from VCs and Angels, the implication now is an exit and a duty to deliver investor updates”
“am loving it, not least of which is that my git server (a 'knot' in Tangled parlance) is under my control”
“Your docs site contains useful instructions and a sidebar that clearly communicates an organization structure.”
“I did try to get some of my git repos on Tangled.org just today, and alas found that the actual git data needs a "knit" server to do that.”
“You have one identity (on a PDS somewhere, optionally self-hosted) which you use to interact with any tangled repository”
“there are a bunch of interesting (and exciting depending on your POV) apps out there that _aren't_ microblogging apps”
“As far as I know only Tangled actually supports it, but unfortunately Tangled is tangled up in its own weird federation ideas.”
“built on the same protocol as bluesky, meaning your identity is preserved across different platforms”
“If you're looking for something light, self-hostable and a bit more social, with pull requests and bug creation from the web”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.