Skip to content

Learning · online encyclopedia

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Hacker Approved

Free, scholarly online encyclopedia of philosophy that people use as a starting point, more substantive than Wikipedia for philosophy topics.

Summarized from 11 comments.

Free, scholarly online encyclopedia of philosophy that people use as a starting point, more substantive than Wikipedia for philosophy topics.

recommend
10
criticize
0
months recommended
7 of 13

Why people love it

  • Good starting point for topics · 2

    the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is excellent as a starting point

    Jun 2026 · comment

    the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good starting point

    Aug 2026 · comment
  • Preferred over Wikipedia for philosophy · 2

    if I have a philosophy question I'll often consult the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy instead of Wikipedia

    Jan 2026 · comment

    I'd point you towards the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the defacto resource for these topics.

    Mar 2026 · comment
  • Excellent, authoritative reference resource · 2

    The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an excellent resource

    May 2026 · comment

    as a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent

    Aug 2026 · comment
  • Accessible introduction to the field · 2

    as a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent

    Aug 2026 · comment

    Anyone interested in this can read the SEP

    Jan 2026 · comment

What hackers pick instead

Every quote

The 11 most detailed of 11 comments. Each links to the original.

  1. if I have a philosophy question I'll often consult the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy instead of Wikipedia

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “25 Years of Wikipedia”

  2. I'd point you towards the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the defacto resource for these topics.

    Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “Are the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Beginning to Dissolve?”

  3. the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is excellent as a starting point

    Recommends · Jun 2026 · in “No, Artificial Intelligence is not Conscious - Ted Chiang”

  4. the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good starting point

    Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy”

  5. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an excellent resource

    Recommends · May 2026 · in “When Dawkins met Claude – Could this AI be conscious?”

  6. as a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent

    Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy”

  7. Anyone interested in this can read the SEP

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Claude's New Constitution”

  8. it's an actual resource, not just pop/ cultural stuff

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Claude's New Constitution”

  9. always an interesting companion to these articles

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “The closer we look at time, the stranger it gets”

  10. You might like process philosophy.

    Recommends · Sep 2026 · in “If materialism is true, the United States is probably conscious”

  11. which was a real eye-opener

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “LLMs will never be alive or intelligent”

Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake