Learning · online encyclopedia
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Hacker Approved
Free, scholarly online encyclopedia of philosophy that people use as a starting point, more substantive than Wikipedia for philosophy topics.
Summarized from 11 comments.
Free, scholarly online encyclopedia of philosophy that people use as a starting point, more substantive than Wikipedia for philosophy topics.
- recommend
- 10
- criticize
- 0
- months recommended
- 7 of 13
Why people love it
Good starting point for topics · 2
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is excellent as a starting point
Jun 2026 · commentthe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good starting point
Aug 2026 · commentPreferred over Wikipedia for philosophy · 2
if I have a philosophy question I'll often consult the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy instead of Wikipedia
Jan 2026 · commentI'd point you towards the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the defacto resource for these topics.
Mar 2026 · commentExcellent, authoritative reference resource · 2
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an excellent resource
May 2026 · commentas a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent
Aug 2026 · commentAccessible introduction to the field · 2
as a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent
Aug 2026 · commentAnyone interested in this can read the SEP
Jan 2026 · comment
What hackers pick instead
- WikipediaA free, volunteer-built, downloadable encyclopedia with sourcing rules and open moderation that's invaluable as a starting point, though critics say contentious political topics are biased or manipulated.404recommend
- GrokipediaRecommended as a comprehensive, easy-to-correct alternative to Wikipedia. Most common caveat: critics call it ideologically biased and prone to errors.52recommend
- Local WikipediaShows Wikipedia articles near your location, which people enjoy for discovering local history. Critics say the radius is not really a half-hour walk and results are thin outside large English-speaking areas.45recommend
- Britannica11.orgA free, fast online version of the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica that people enjoy browsing and find nostalgic. Critics note search and rendering errors.14recommend
- WikidataA free, community-edited knowledge base of structured data linking entities like books, species and companies by shared identifiers, queryable with SPARQL. Coverage is uneven and varies by topic.13recommend
Every quote
The 11 most detailed of 11 comments. Each links to the original.
if I have a philosophy question I'll often consult the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy instead of Wikipedia
Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “25 Years of Wikipedia”
I'd point you towards the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the defacto resource for these topics.
Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “Are the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Beginning to Dissolve?”
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is excellent as a starting point
Recommends · Jun 2026 · in “No, Artificial Intelligence is not Conscious - Ted Chiang”
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good starting point
Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy”
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an excellent resource
Recommends · May 2026 · in “When Dawkins met Claude – Could this AI be conscious?”
as a source for making the field accessible, SEP is excellent
Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy”
Anyone interested in this can read the SEP
Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Claude's New Constitution”
it's an actual resource, not just pop/ cultural stuff
Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Claude's New Constitution”
always an interesting companion to these articles
Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “The closer we look at time, the stranger it gets”
You might like process philosophy.
Recommends · Sep 2026 · in “If materialism is true, the United States is probably conscious”
which was a real eye-opener
Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “LLMs will never be alive or intelligent”
Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake