Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Spack

Shares rank 26 of 35 package managers by recommenders

Free HPC package manager that makes optimised builds with custom compilers easier. Caveat: Windows packages are less mature, and it integrates poorly with uv.

Free HPC package manager that makes optimised builds with custom compilers easier. Caveat: Windows packages are less mature, and it integrates poorly with uv.

10 people gave an opinion

recommend it
8
criticize it
2
approval share
80%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 6 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 8 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 4 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 6 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Optimised builds with custom compilers

    “you can get optimised builds with whatever compiler tool chain and options you need quite easily that way”

    Comment from 1 Nov 2025 on Hacker News

    “Spack and EasyBuild make this much much easier.”

    Comment from 17 Apr 2026 in “30 Years of HPC: many hardware advances, little adoption of new languages”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Poor integration with uv

    “doesn't integrate well with uv etc.”

    Comment from 22 May 2026 in “Uv is fantastic, but its package management UX is a mess”

Other package managers people recommend

The four most recommended other package managers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Spack compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Nix37815072%133 yrs24 ownersApproved
Homebrew27117561%1210 yrs13 owners—
npm16146126%12——
pnpm1242484%125 yrs4 ownersApproved
SpackThis page8280%6——
See all 35 package managers, ranked

What people said

8 of the 13 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Works on macOS and Windows (though Windows packages aren't quite as mature as Linux and macOS)”

RecommendsComment from 14 Sep 2026 in “Pkgsrc Is Cool (2022)”

“EasyBuild and Spack were full of half broken recipes”

CriticizesComment from 25 Aug 2026 in “Hot Chips 2026: CUDA Targets RISC-V”

“doesn't integrate well with uv etc.”

MixedComment from 22 May 2026 in “Uv is fantastic, but its package management UX is a mess”

“Spack and EasyBuild make this much much easier.”

RecommendsComment from 17 Apr 2026 in “30 Years of HPC: many hardware advances, little adoption of new languages”

“Spack is a really unfortunate name for a project given that it's a slur derived from 'spastic' in the UK.”

CriticizesComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “Homebrew no longer allows bypassing Gatekeeper for unsigned/unnotarized software”

“Nix, Pkgsrc, MacPorts, and (and now Spack) all have better fundamental designs”

RecommendsComment from 12 Nov 2025 in “Homebrew no longer allows bypassing Gatekeeper for unsigned/unnotarized software”

“you get the package name immediately from the left, which is nice”

MixedComment from 1 Nov 2025 on Hacker News

“you can get optimised builds with whatever compiler tool chain and options you need quite easily that way”

RecommendsComment from 1 Nov 2025 on Hacker News

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.