SourceHut
Hacker ApprovedRanked 7 of 22 Git forges by recommenders
A fast, uncluttered git forge with strong CI, an email-based patch workflow and reasonable pricing, though critics dislike the email workflow and the owner's opinionated policies.
A fast, uncluttered git forge with strong CI, an email-based patch workflow and reasonable pricing, though critics dislike the email workflow and the owner's opinionated policies.
135 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 99
- criticize it
- 36
- approval share
- 73%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 99 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.8 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Fast, minimal, uncluttered interface
“The UI is fast, but it can be difficult to navigate, at least if you aren't familiar with it.”
Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” “every time I use it I am pleasantly surprised how fast it is and how little clutter there is”
Comment from 24 Apr 2026 in “Incident with Multple GitHub Services” “It's the only forge out there that isn't set out to copy the Github UI like everyone else.”
Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” - Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “Changes to Sourcehut's terms of service regarding LLMs”
Email patch workflow, no account
“It uses a mailing list-based workflow so contributing code or bug reports is relatively effortless and doesn't require a Sourcehut account.”
Comment from 3 Dec 2025 in “Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service” “Uses the same email-based patch workflow as Linux. Takes an hour to learn, and they have helpful guides”
Comment from 31 Mar 2026 in “GitHub backs down, kills Copilot pull-request ads after backlash” “sourcehut has very good mailing list support, that is mostly equivalent to github pull requests”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub” - Comment from 2 Jan 2026 in “Why users cannot create Issues directly (Ghostty)”
- Comment from 1 May 2026 in “If I Could Make My Own GitHub”
- Comment from 7 Aug 2026 in “GitHub Is Experiencing Difficulties”
Excellent built-in CI
“they have a very nice "edit manifest and run" feature that makes it easy to quickly test a change while debugging”
Comment from 14 Jan 2026 in “I Hate GitHub Actions with Passion” “I also like it, particularly for its outstanding CI, but I don't like the patch/email-centric approach.”
Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” “CI, web-based ticket submission for anyone with a site-wide login, static hosting, good price”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Tell HN: GitHub Is Experiencing Degraded Performance” Fair pricing, pay not product
“asking for some money upfront to cover the actual hosting costs and other stuff feels pretty good”
Comment from 3 Dec 2025 in “Codeberg is down” “CI, web-based ticket submission for anyone with a site-wide login, static hosting, good price”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Tell HN: GitHub Is Experiencing Degraded Performance” “Sourcehut is pretty good if you're willing to pay the (very reasonable may I add) prices”
Comment from 30 Mar 2026 in “Copilot edited an ad into my PR” - Comment from 27 Apr 2026 in “GitHub Alternatives?”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Dislike email/mailing-list workflow
“I also like it, particularly for its outstanding CI, but I don't like the patch/email-centric approach.”
Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” “It's kind of a bummer SourceHut stuck so stubbornly to mailing list only workflows.”
Comment from 27 Nov 2025 in “Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg” “I really really love it but I just can’t get myself to embrace the email workflow.”
Comment from 9 Jul 2026 in “Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives” Owner's opinionated hosting policies
“the policy is not just dumb and unenforceable, it is also poorly reasoned. Many of the arguments apply equally to other technologies, or don't apply to AI-generated code in the first place.”
Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “Changes to Sourcehut's terms of service regarding LLMs” “Drew's direct engagement into tech cancel-culture (with targets such as DHH, RMS, Andreas Kling, Jack Dorsey), makes it difficult to do business with him”
Comment from 3 Dec 2025 in “Codeberg is down” “I would not trust Sourcehut. If Drew decides one day that he does not like you, your politics, or your industry, he will just cut you off.”
Comment from 9 Jul 2026 in “Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives” - Comment from 27 Dec 2025 in “Publishing your work increases your luck”
- Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “Changes to Sourcehut's terms of service regarding LLMs”
- Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “Changes to Sourcehut's terms of service regarding LLMs”
UI hard to navigate
“Using Gitlab or Sourcehut is painful. I'm glad they both exist but the UI, in my opinion, is not as good as Github.”
Comment from 4 Feb 2026 in “A programmer's guide to leaving GitHub” “The UI is fast, but it can be difficult to navigate, at least if you aren't familiar with it.”
Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” Not a GitHub drop-in replacement
“it's very opinionated and may not be suitable for what a lot of people think of when they're coming from something like Github”
Comment from 23 Mar 2026 in “Migrating to the EU” “Not a drop-in replacement for GitHub admittedly. Requires a bit more skills from the contributors.”
Comment from 1 Aug 2026 in “GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement” “But it's tough to use for a team that isn't building open source software.”
Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “GitHub to Codeberg: my experience” - Comment from 27 Nov 2025 in “Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg”
Other Git forges people recommend
The four most recommended other Git forges, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 22 Git forges, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 165 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“The only material difference is that the deploy keys for *.sr.ht present (by design) on builds.sr.ht also have access to”
“I liked using Sourcehut for my personal projects because it just got out of my way”
“Sourcehut was a minimalistic service fitting to my minimalistic personal needs. Not anymore.”
“the policy is not just dumb and unenforceable, it is also poorly reasoned. Many of the arguments apply equally to other technologies, or don't apply to AI-generated code in the first place.”
“I pay them for infrastructure and service, not for some pseudo-moral ideas about how I should write my code.”
“fixable with github mirror that points to sourcehut instance as a canonical development platform”
“CI, web-based ticket submission for anyone with a site-wide login, static hosting, good price”
“sourcehut has very good mailing list support, that is mostly equivalent to github pull requests”
“I hear good things from people who've used sourcehut's "email a patch" model”
“Not a drop-in replacement for GitHub admittedly. Requires a bit more skills from the contributors.”
“Not sure how Anubis plays with SourceHut trying to be js-free, but otherwise it's awesome.”
“I still don’t like it, but I get it, and at least it was handled professionally.”
“I would not trust Sourcehut. If Drew decides one day that he does not like you, your politics, or your industry, he will just cut you off.”
“I really really love it but I just can’t get myself to embrace the email workflow.”
“It's a one-time process to generate long-lived keys and another to set up with SourceHut and that's all I need to do.”
“CodeBerg [1] and SourceHut [2] both offer Git hosting but don't merely describe themselves as "GitHub but X"”
“In addition you get a public mailing list where people can send issues and patch to.”
“it did make me feel like it's very clearly the "correct" way of doing things”
“It is different because Drew DeVault is scathingly anti-AI, and has a history of sticking to strong opinions”
“At least Sourcehut isn't completely proprietary and shoving AI down your throat at every possible chance”
“SourceHut if you believe in paying for products instead of being the product”
“every time I use it I am pleasantly surprised how fast it is and how little clutter there is”
“Uses the same email-based patch workflow as Linux. Takes an hour to learn, and they have helpful guides”
“Sourcehut is pretty good if you're willing to pay the (very reasonable may I add) prices”
“it's very opinionated and may not be suitable for what a lot of people think of when they're coming from something like Github”
“Using Gitlab or Sourcehut is painful. I'm glad they both exist but the UI, in my opinion, is not as good as Github.”
“they have a very nice "edit manifest and run" feature that makes it easy to quickly test a change while debugging”
“Sourcehut projects use this workflow almost exclusively since it's the default by design.”
“I think Sourcehut is the more portable of Git forges. Everything is stored in standard formats”
“The owner is very opinionated and likes to get involved in what projects are and are not allowed to be hosted there”
“asking for some money upfront to cover the actual hosting costs and other stuff feels pretty good”
“Drew's direct engagement into tech cancel-culture (with targets such as DHH, RMS, Andreas Kling, Jack Dorsey), makes it difficult to do business with him”
“Both Codeberg and sourcehut are good options when escaping the walled gardens of Big Tech”
“It uses a mailing list-based workflow so contributing code or bug reports is relatively effortless and doesn't require a Sourcehut account.”
“But it's tough to use for a team that isn't building open source software.”
“The UI is fast, but it can be difficult to navigate, at least if you aren't familiar with it.”
“I also like it, particularly for its outstanding CI, but I don't like the patch/email-centric approach.”
“It's the only forge out there that isn't set out to copy the Github UI like everyone else.”
“lack of the organizations that would allow multiple contributors working on the project”
“It's kind of a bummer SourceHut stuck so stubbornly to mailing list only workflows.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.