# SourceHut builds.sr.ht

5 Hacker News commenters recommended SourceHut builds.sr.ht and 1 criticized it, November 2025 to November 2026. It was recommended in 4 of 13 months.

**Verdict:** People recommend it for simple shell-based builds, SSH access into failed jobs, and triggering jobs by submitting a YAML file. Critics note it is barebones compared with GitHub Actions.

## Why people recommend it

- SSH into failed job's VM to debug (2 comments): "It is trivial do debug failing state there since you can ssh into the job's vm." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46901094)) "When the build fails, you can SSH into the machine and debug it from there." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46616866))

## What people warn about

- Barebones, lacking features versus GitHub Actions (1 comments): "is pretty barebones / lacking compared to GH/GitHub actions" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47944008))

## Alternatives hackers recommend

- [GitHub Actions](https://hackerapproved.com/p/github-actions.md): 234 recommend
- [Jenkins](https://hackerapproved.com/p/jenkins.md): 67 recommend
- [GitLab CI](https://hackerapproved.com/p/gitlab-ci.md): 56 recommend
- [Dagger](https://hackerapproved.com/p/dagger.md): 43 recommend
- [Woodpecker CI](https://hackerapproved.com/p/woodpecker-ci.md): 37 recommend

## Where to get it

- [Visit the official site](https://builds.sr.ht/)

## Cite as

Hacker Approved, "SourceHut builds.sr.ht", https://hackerapproved.com/p/sourcehut-builds-sr-ht/ (counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026).
