Skip to content

Developer tools · observability platform

SigNoz

Hacker Approved

Open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability tool with strong dashboards and APM charts that people self-host cheaply. Common caveat: alerting is weaker than the rest.

Summarized from 26 comments.

Open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability tool with strong dashboards and APM charts that people self-host cheaply. Common caveat: alerting is weaker than the rest.

recommend
19
criticize
2
months recommended
9 of 13

Why people love it

  • OpenTelemetry-native and open source · 3

    we're opentelemetry-native and apart from many out of box charts for APM, infra monitoring, and logs

    Nov 2025 · comment

    Mostly slick, under active development, communicative team, open source

    Nov 2025 · comment

    open source and opentelemetry-native

    Nov 2025 · comment
  • Strong dashboards and trace monitoring · 2

    we're opentelemetry-native and apart from many out of box charts for APM, infra monitoring, and logs

    Nov 2025 · comment

    SigNoz has great dashboards and trace and metrics monitoring, but its alerting system isn’t great.

    Jul 2026 · comment
  • Much cheaper than commercial alternatives · 3

    It costs me $30/month and I can throw large quantities of data at it and it doesn’t break a sweat.

    Jan 2026 · comment

    I was paying a fortune for a cloud observability platform that cost more and more every month

    Nov 2025 · comment

    Works nicely with my existing Signoz, costs nothing extra

    Sep 2026 · comment
  • Easy self-hosting and active development · 4

    Mostly slick, under active development, communicative team, open source

    Nov 2025 · comment

    seem easy to self-host and decent enough

    Dec 2025 · comment

    make SigNoz deployment actually painless

    Feb 2026 · comment

What hackers pick instead

Every quote

The 22 most detailed of 26 comments. Each links to the original.

  1. we're opentelemetry-native and apart from many out of box charts for APM, infra monitoring, and logs

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  2. It costs me $30/month and I can throw large quantities of data at it and it doesn’t break a sweat.

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “I built Vector. Now I'm answering the question your observability vendor won't”

  3. SigNoz has great dashboards and trace and metrics monitoring, but its alerting system isn’t great.

    Mixed · Jul 2026 · in “Ask HN: What are your current favorite monitoring and observability solutions?”

  4. I was paying a fortune for a cloud observability platform that cost more and more every month

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  5. Mostly slick, under active development, communicative team, open source

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  6. Works nicely with my existing Signoz, costs nothing extra

    Recommends · Sep 2026 · in “Ask HN: What are you working on? (September 2026)”

  7. seem easy to self-host and decent enough

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “Logging sucks”

  8. make SigNoz deployment actually painless

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “Foundry:Deploy and manage full observability stack on Linux with a single binary”

  9. Signoz is good, and active development

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  10. open source and opentelemetry-native

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  11. Its the closest I have tried, but I still wouldn't put it quite at the same level of usability

    Mixed · Nov 2025 · in “OpenTelemetry: Escape Hatch from the Observability Cartel”

  12. it's not a 100% match, but you can do Prometheus metrics, logs analysis, dashboards

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “I can't recommend Grafana anymore”

  13. It exposes a programmatic trace API, which makes building custom views possible

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “We built OTEL observability directly into our AI agent framework”

  14. I believe both are very good products that focus on slightly different things.

    Recommends · May 2026 · in “Traceway: MIT-licensed observability stack you can self-host in ~90s”

  15. I prefer to have my sensitive system logs and traces in house.

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Datadog, Thank You for Blocking Us”

  16. custom SigNoz shell scripts to drive API calls

    Recommends · Aug 2026 · in “Ask HN: Why do we need MCP?”

  17. You don't need to sift through 26 log files.

    Recommends · Jul 2026 · in “What Even Are Microservices?”

  18. works well enough for the main APM use-case

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Ask HN: Cheaper Datadog Anyone?”

  19. I've heard good things about SigNoz as well

    Recommends · Nov 2025 · in “Show HN: Spikelog – A simple metrics service for scripts, cron jobs, and MVPs”

  20. it too relies on a mix of query languages

    Mixed · Aug 2026 · in “OTel Isn't Going Well (and I Made a Spreadsheet About It)”

  21. feel painful to setup and manage as coolify projects

    Criticizes · Feb 2026 · in “Ask HN: I've started using Coolify, any recommendations?”

  22. neither seems particularly pleasant

    Criticizes · Aug 2026 · in “OTel Isn't Going Well (and I Made a Spreadsheet About It)”

Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake