Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Shitter

Ranked 3 of 3 social media viewers by recommenders

Free read-only Twitter front end with many working instances; critics note Firefox image loading bugs and no explanation of the fork.

Free read-only Twitter front end with many working instances; critics note Firefox image loading bugs and no explanation of the fork.

7 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
criticize it
2
approval share
71%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 1 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 2.5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Many working instances available

    “many working instances right now”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”
  • Read-only viewing changes how people engage

    “It's read only, which changes how people engage.”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”
  • Admired as a clever idea

    “Rarely am I so envious of another’s idea.”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Images fail to load in Firefox

    “there seems to be a bug loading images (e.g. profile pictures or attached pictures to tweets) in Firefox”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”
  • Readme does not explain the fork

    “The readme doesn't even say anything about why the fork is created”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

    “there is not even a sentence explaining why it's a fork”

    Comment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

Other social media viewers people recommend

The two most recommended other social media viewers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Shitter compared with 2 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Twitter Viewer91047%1——
imginn.com6186%6——
ShitterThis page5271%1——
See all 3 social media viewers, ranked

What people said

6 of the 7 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“The readme doesn't even say anything about why the fork is created”

CriticizesComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

“Rarely am I so envious of another’s idea.”

RecommendsComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

“there is not even a sentence explaining why it's a fork”

CriticizesComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

“It's read only, which changes how people engage.”

RecommendsComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

“there seems to be a bug loading images (e.g. profile pictures or attached pictures to tweets) in Firefox”

MixedComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

“many working instances right now”

RecommendsComment from 23 Oct 2026 in “Shitter – A Nitter Fork”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.