Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Stable Diffusion SDXL

Shares rank 18 of 22 image generation models by recommenders

People recommend it for LoRA-based stylizing and inpainting and fast local runs; critics say it is weak at composition and has been surpassed.

People recommend it for LoRA-based stylizing and inpainting and fast local runs; critics say it is weak at composition and has been surpassed.

12 people gave an opinion

recommend it
8
criticize it
4
approval share
67%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 5 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 8 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Strong results with LoRAs and inpainting

    “SDXL and FLUX models with LoRAs can and do vastly outperform at tons of things singular big models can't or won't do now”

    Comment from 11 Nov 2025 in “We ran over 600 image generations to compare AI image models”

    “SDXL is crap at composition. It's really good with LoRAs to stylize/inpaint though.”

    Comment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

    “post-training on SDXL and Flux have given me good results here in the past”

    Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Nano Banana Pro”
  • Still competitive on image quality

    “There's not much of a reason to use SD 1.5 over SDXL if image quality is paramount.”

    Comment from 26 Nov 2025 in “FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence”

    “Even SDXL looks better, and that's a literal dinosaur.”

    Comment from 26 Nov 2025 in “FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence”

    “dreaded SDXL is still unmatched”

    Comment from 24 Oct 2026 in “A practical guide to AI image generation, from diffusion to agents”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Outclassed by newer models

    “SDXL has been outclassed for a while”

    Comment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

    “SDXL has long been surpassed”

    Comment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

Other image generation models people recommend

The four most recommended other image generation models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Stable Diffusion SDXL compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Nano Banana26515963%126 mo5 owners—
gpt-image-1797950%12——
FLUX.2665156%10——
gpt-image-2632671%8—Approved
Stable Diffusion SDXLThis page8467%5——
See all 22 image generation models, ranked

What people said

All 14 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“dreaded SDXL is still unmatched”

RecommendsComment from 24 Oct 2026 in “A practical guide to AI image generation, from diffusion to agents”

“From a prompt adherency perspective, absolutely not.”

MixedComment from 20 May 2026 in “Remove AI Watermarks”

“will likely destroy a lot of small details”

CriticizesComment from 19 May 2026 in “Remove AI Watermarks”

“byzantine syntax requirements of the SD/SDXL days”

CriticizesComment from 22 Apr 2026 in “ChatGPT Images 2.0”

“the average person doing the work has been very happy with SDXL based models”

RecommendsComment from 10 Feb 2026 in “Qwen-Image-2.0: Professional infographics, exquisite photorealism”

“I also run SDXL it runs rather quickly”

RecommendsComment from 7 Feb 2026 in “Ask HN: Anyone Using a Mac Studio for Local AI/LLM?”

“SDXL is crap at composition. It's really good with LoRAs to stylize/inpaint though.”

MixedComment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

“SDXL has long been surpassed”

CriticizesComment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

“SDXL continues to shine here.”

RecommendsComment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

“SDXL has been outclassed for a while”

CriticizesComment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters”

“There's not much of a reason to use SD 1.5 over SDXL if image quality is paramount.”

RecommendsComment from 26 Nov 2025 in “FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence”

“Even SDXL looks better, and that's a literal dinosaur.”

RecommendsComment from 26 Nov 2025 in “FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence”

“post-training on SDXL and Flux have given me good results here in the past”

RecommendsComment from 20 Nov 2025 in “Nano Banana Pro”

“SDXL and FLUX models with LoRAs can and do vastly outperform at tons of things singular big models can't or won't do now”

RecommendsComment from 11 Nov 2025 in “We ran over 600 image generations to compare AI image models”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.