rustc_codegen_gcc
Ranked 7 of 10 compiler infrastructures by recommenders
Lets the Rust compiler generate code through GCC instead of LLVM, and it is now usable through rustup. Its most common caveat is that it is not quite production-ready yet.
Lets the Rust compiler generate code through GCC instead of LLVM, and it is now usable through rustup. Its most common caveat is that it is not quite production-ready yet.
9 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 9
- criticize it
- 0
- approval share
- 100%
Recommended in 5 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 9 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
- Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Steadily improving, nearly production-ready
“They are't quite production-ready yet, but there's a decent chance it's good enough”
Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “APT Rust requirement raises questions” “I think it is pretty far along.”
Comment from 4 Feb 2026 in “Rust in the NetBSD Kernel, and other odd decisions” “it's getting better and better”
Comment from 13 Sep 2026 in “Libraries Run Rust Inside Python (With PyO3)” Already usable today via rustup
“already available as a rustup component and can compile any rust code”
Comment from 3 Jul 2026 in “crustc: entirety of `rustc`, translated to C” “cool that it's already possible”
Comment from 5 Nov 2025 in “Hard Rust requirements from May onward”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Not quite production-ready yet
“They are't quite production-ready yet, but there's a decent chance it's good enough”
Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “APT Rust requirement raises questions”
Other compiler infrastructures people recommend
The four most recommended other compiler infrastructures, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLVM | 119 | 96 | 55% | 12 | 6 yrs3 owners | — |
| QBE | 16 | 10 | 62% | 9 | — | — |
| EDG C++ front-end | 15 | 3 | 83% | 2 | — | — |
| Roslyn | 11 | 1 | 92% | 8 | — | Approved |
| rustc_codegen_gccThis page | 9 | 0 | 100% | 5 | — | — |
What people said
9 of the 10 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“That's going to be amazing when it lands.”
“it's getting better and better”
“already available as a rustup component and can compile any rust code”
“I just noticed that rustc_codegen_gcc has been accepted into the mainline Rust compiler”
“I think it is pretty far along.”
“so you can just skip the C part”
“They are't quite production-ready yet, but there's a decent chance it's good enough”
“you're probably better off with rustc_codegen_gcc instead”
“cool that it's already possible”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.