rsync
Ranked 2 of 14 file sync apps by recommenders
A decades-old, widely installed tool trusted for reliable copies and backups that skips unchanged files and preserves metadata, though recent 3.4.3 releases drew complaints about AI-assisted regressions.
A decades-old, widely installed tool trusted for reliable copies and backups that skips unchanged files and preserves metadata, though recent 3.4.3 releases drew complaints about AI-assisted regressions.
242 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 157
- criticize it
- 85
- approval share
- 65%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 24 years
Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 157 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.8 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Rock-solid, trusted for decades
“rsync is a gift to the world and we should be grateful and mindful of how much it has been quietly woven into the fabric of computing”
Comment from 6 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?” “You have a rock solid piece of software used by an infinite amount of people and other services. It works fine, does it's job”
Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software – Rsync” “The peace of mind that it'd do the right thing and not needing to research flags are more than worth any speed tradeoffs.”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “Migrating a Synology NAS to a UniFi UNAS Pro 8 with Robocopy, SMB Multichannel” - Comment from 6 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?”
- Comment from 17 Sep 2026 in “Backups Aren't Simple”
- Comment from 3 Jan 2026 in “The rsync algorithm (1996) [pdf]”
- Comment from 1 Jun 2026 in “Remove all LLM generated commits before people get hurt by this nonsense”
- Comment from 7 Jun 2026 in “Communities of Not”
Delta transfer skips unchanged files
“I prefer rsync because of its delta transfer which doesn't resend files already on the destination, saving bandwidth.”
Comment from 2 Feb 2026 in “4x faster network file sync with rclone (vs rsync) (2025)” “rsync will likely be faster if some files are already in the destination as it handles that intelligently”
Comment from 3 Feb 2026 in “4x faster network file sync with rclone (vs rsync) (2025)” “rsync speeds this up significantly since most (but not all) of the ISO is unchanged.”
Comment from 10 Sep 2026 in “Show HN: Syq – copy files between machines fast (better than rsync)” Preserves metadata, exact copies
“Besides being faster, with rsync and the right command options you can be certain that it makes exact file copies, together with any file metadata”
Comment from 16 Dec 2025 in “High Performance SSH/SCP” “rsync is one of the few utilities that preserve all metadata even when copying between distinct file systems”
Comment from 26 Jul 2026 in “No Stack Overflow, No Autocomplete: What Coding Felt Like in the 80s” “recent rsync versions (3.2.3 2020-08-06) can do it with the extra option --crtimes”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “Migrating a Synology NAS to a UniFi UNAS Pro 8 with Robocopy, SMB Multichannel” Great for backups and restores
“rsync is better if you are technical enough to use it to restore after destructive changes”
Comment from 1 Aug 2026 in “Pgtestdb's template cloning approach to testing is fast” “my primary line of defense is rsync to a server running ZFS with hourly snapshots”
Comment from 1 Feb 2026 in “TIL: Apple Broke Time Machine Again on Tahoe” “I eventually just wrote an incremental backup script in rsync. I'm much happier.”
Comment from 1 Feb 2026 in “TIL: Apple Broke Time Machine Again on Tahoe”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Regressions in 3.4.3 release
“my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system started to fail on anything but a full backup”
Comment from 5 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?” “Rsync should rightly loose reputation if the project allows the release breaking changes to follow the latest hype trend”
Comment from 7 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?” “The real issue is the irresponsible use of buggy machine-generated code in a project that many people depend on.”
Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software – Rsync” - Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software – Rsync”
- Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?”
Concerns over AI-generated code
“I was hoping that at least some solid bedrock of stadalone command-line tools would withstand the deluge of AI slop.”
Comment from 30 May 2026 in “Rsync 3.4.3 has hundreds of Claude commits” “The real issue is the irresponsible use of buggy machine-generated code in a project that many people depend on.”
Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software – Rsync” “I would expect a 10x change rate, even carried out by clones of the existing maintainers to result in more bugs.”
Comment from 6 Jun 2026 in “Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync?” - Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software – Rsync”
Many flags, trailing slash confusion
“Sure, I _can_ make rsync do any number of rarely-used optimizations, if I feel like studying the manpage for half an hour”
Comment from 10 Sep 2026 in “Show HN: Syq – copy files between machines fast (better than rsync)” “an ancient command line application with a zillion flags on it is just about as user hostile as you can get”
Comment from 27 May 2026 in “Dropbox CEO Drew Houston to step down” “would behave differently for 'rsync a b' vs 'rsync a/ b/', even though I added the slash for both sides.”
Comment from 3 Oct 2026 in “cp: -r or -R?” - Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Disable Your SSH access accidentally with scp”
Other file sync apps people recommend
The four most recommended other file sync apps, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syncthing | 212 | 42 | 83% | 12 | 5 yrs6 owners | Approved |
| rsyncThis page | 157 | 85 | 65% | 12 | 24 yrs4 owners | — |
| Nextcloud | 154 | 126 | 55% | 12 | 3 yrs21 owners | — |
| rclone | 95 | 13 | 88% | 12 | 3 yrs3 owners | Approved |
| Unison file synchronizer | 24 | 3 | 89% | 11 | — | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 265 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“would behave differently for 'rsync a b' vs 'rsync a/ b/', even though I added the slash for both sides.”
“go and look at how the good people and claude over at rsync are fixing all their bad security bugs currently”
“Using old standardized open source tools means it survives system updates without having to fix anything for years.”
“Sure, I _can_ make rsync do any number of rarely-used optimizations, if I feel like studying the manpage for half an hour”
“rsync speeds this up significantly since most (but not all) of the ISO is unchanged.”
“rsync however, is totally worth it if there is any chance the transfer gets interrupted”
“recent rsync versions (3.2.3 2020-08-06) can do it with the extra option --crtimes”
“The peace of mind that it'd do the right thing and not needing to research flags are more than worth any speed tradeoffs.”
“rsync is better if you are technical enough to use it to restore after destructive changes”
“rsync is one of the few utilities that preserve all metadata even when copying between distinct file systems”
“The Ubuntu backport did include regressions that an Ubuntu update a couple of days later addresses”
“Rsync should rightly loose reputation if the project allows the release breaking changes to follow the latest hype trend”
“Rsync is a high reputation software trusted by many people to move important data”
“the ability to dynamically skip compressing media and zipped files for transfer can be extremely handy”
“a test suite that makes the rsync development better, more rigorous and copes with the onslaught of both good and bad AI generated PRs”
“I trust rsync (which handles critical data on my system) because I know a veteran of 40 years wrote the code it runs”
“rsync is a gift to the world and we should be grateful and mindful of how much it has been quietly woven into the fabric of computing”
“I would expect a 10x change rate, even carried out by clones of the existing maintainers to result in more bugs.”
“my systems recently updated to rsync 3.4.3, and as soon as that happened my backup system started to fail on anything but a full backup”
“Tridge wrote a fine piece of software, and he knows how to write serious software”
“All claims I have seen so far of people being affected by bugs seem deeply implausible.”
“The outcome is exactly the same as if I had run "scp /etc/services example.com:/tmp/services"”
“this is exactly how it was used for rsync which caused the outrage you're all complaining about”
“The real issue is the irresponsible use of buggy machine-generated code in a project that many people depend on.”
“There's plenty of evidence that rsync 3.4.3 has broken a bunch of features like incremental copies, yes.”
“You have a rock solid piece of software used by an infinite amount of people and other services. It works fine, does it's job”
“I was hoping that at least some solid bedrock of stadalone command-line tools would withstand the deluge of AI slop.”
“an ancient command line application with a zillion flags on it is just about as user hostile as you can get”
“I run rsync -a --exclude='.ssh' --dry-run ./ user@host:~/target to verify before I commit the changes”
“something about the trailing slash will cause the command to behave differently the second time”
“rsync will likely be faster if some files are already in the destination as it handles that intelligently”
“Rsync is great. However for huge filesystems (many files and directories) with relatively less change”
“I prefer rsync because of its delta transfer which doesn't resend files already on the destination, saving bandwidth.”
“I have rsync at hand, which can compute checksums, delete files after the transfer, etc.”
“my primary line of defense is rsync to a server running ZFS with hourly snapshots”
“I eventually just wrote an incremental backup script in rsync. I'm much happier.”
“it was kind of amazing to watch rsync perform this job both automatically and without complaint”
“Besides being faster, with rsync and the right command options you can be certain that it makes exact file copies, together with any file metadata”
“rsync is the closest thing to a real successor, but no Web browser support that either.”
“rsync, ftp, and smb have all existed for decades and work very well on spotty, slow connections”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.