Developer tools · ci runner
RISE RISC-V Runners
Free native RISC-V continuous integration on GitHub Actions, backed by the Linux Foundation. Critics say the hardware is old and it is slower than emulation.
Summarized from 9 comments.
Free native RISC-V continuous integration on GitHub Actions, backed by the Linux Foundation. Critics say the hardware is old and it is slower than emulation.
- recommend
- 7
- criticize
- 2
- months recommended
- 1 of 13
Why people love it
Linux Foundation backing builds trust · 2
It seems to be a Linux Foundation project, my trust is implicit higher than what you're claiming.
Mar 2026 · commentThe Linux Foundation backing does address the trust question well
Mar 2026 · comment
What people warn about
Trusting a third-party orchestrator with secrets · 1
I’m concerned about the security/trust model: using a third-party CI orchestrator on top of GHA means trusting them with all of your secrets
Mar 2026 · commentOld hardware, no RVV · 1
Sadly still on quite old hardware, with no RVV.
Mar 2026 · commentSlower than emulation · 1
it's slower than using emulation
Mar 2026 · commentCheaper to buy your own board · 1
No one in their right mind would touch this. It's cheaper to buy the board yourself.
Mar 2026 · comment
What hackers pick instead
- Blacksmith runnersDevelopers recommend it for faster CI builds and tests and lower cost than GitHub-hosted runners. Critics say a free trial led to unexpected charges and weak support.22recommend
- WarpBuildRecommended as cheaper and faster GitHub Actions runners, including macOS, with an easy setup. Critics note it depends on GitHub's platform and pricing decisions.12recommend
- GitHub Actions self-hosted runnersRecommended for running CI jobs on your own machines, often much faster than GitHub's cloud runners and easy to set up. Critics point to hangs, CPU-hungry sleep loops, and weak support outside Linux.9recommend
- NamespaceDevelopers use it as a faster GitHub Actions runner that fixed their CI problems. The most common caveat is that its custom setup makes switching back to another provider hard.8recommend
- Forgejo RunnerPeople recommend it as a small, solid CI runner that is easy to build and run, and that works well with Forgejo and Gitea.8recommend
Every quote
The 7 most detailed of 9 comments. Each links to the original.
I’m concerned about the security/trust model: using a third-party CI orchestrator on top of GHA means trusting them with all of your secrets
Mixed · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
It seems to be a Linux Foundation project, my trust is implicit higher than what you're claiming.
Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
The Linux Foundation backing does address the trust question well
Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
Sadly still on quite old hardware, with no RVV.
Mixed · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
it's slower than using emulation
Mixed · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
No one in their right mind would touch this. It's cheaper to buy the board yourself.
Criticizes · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
The idea is to promote testing on RISC-V and to eliminate lack of hardware for being the reason not to.
Recommends · Mar 2026 · in “The RISE RISC-V Runners: free, native RISC-V CI on GitHub”
Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake