Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Radicle

Hacker Approved

Ranked 8 of 22 Git forges by recommenders

A peer-to-peer Git forge that stores issues and patches in the repo and keeps working offline or when hosts go down, though a private-repository security flaw drew sharp criticism.

A peer-to-peer Git forge that stores issues and patches in the repo and keeps working offline or when hosts go down, though a private-repository security flaw drew sharp criticism.

136 people gave an opinion

recommend it
95
criticize it
41
approval share
70%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 12 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Owned for 6 months

Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.

Each square is one year.

Why it carries the badge

  • 95 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 2.3 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Truly decentralized, peer-to-peer hosting

    “Every time I read about an emulation or file sharing project kicked off of GitHub, I think: should have used Radicle.”

    Comment from 23 Jan 2026 in “Radicle: The Sovereign Forge”

    “Instead of creating one more centralized alternative, it's best to invest all effort into a decentralized solution”

    Comment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative”

    “These p2p solutions are more like bittorrent where you can clone as long as someone is seeding”

    Comment from 23 Jul 2026 in “Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects”
  • Keeps working when hosts go down

    “With Radicle you can continue to work locally with all issues etc intact, even if your main host is down.”

    Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

    “the main benefit is that everything continues working even though HardenedBSDs official seed is down”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

    “provides self-hosting with decentralized mirrors for both added availability and DDoS resistance”

    Comment from 23 Jul 2026 in “Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects”
  • Issues and patches stored in Git

    “where they manage issues/prs/user identities as git objects, so your entire project is self contained as git repository”

    Comment from 1 Aug 2026 in “GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement”

    “This looks like a much more sensible design for code repos: all the artifacts live in the repo.”

    Comment from 18 Jul 2026 in “Gleam Is Now on Tangled”

    “which can be used to develop git-based projects (including issues etc) in a distributed manner”

    Comment from 20 Mar 2026 in “Store birth date in systemd for age verification”
  • Local-first, works offline

    “With Radicle you can continue to work locally with all issues etc intact, even if your main host is down.”

    Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

    “Radicle is local-first, so you can create issues and patches (pull requests) even when offline.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Private repository security vulnerability

    “announcement 3 months later is not super great, considering that the current advice is "Stop using private repositories (over the network) until the security update is released."”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

    “"Your Data, Forever and Secure" in big bold letters on their homepage with total disregard for the truth of that statement”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

    “There's no structural separation of public / private repositories; this is one bug or fat-finger away from a leak.”

    Comment from 16 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”
  • Amateurish security practices

    “you should stop and look for someone who does to check your system in the real world before you tell people to depend on it”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

    “they were depending on libraries (both by Cyphernet, interestingly) and implicitly trusting them, instead of verifying.”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

    “If a core feature of your software requires security guarantees you can't just say they don't have a "security team"”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”
  • Weak search and social discovery

    “Its pretty much exactly what is being asked for here. The main issue I see is its impossible to search through peoples projects”

    Comment from 1 May 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges”

    “The social / coordination control-plane angle is really thin, following users and repos goes by opaque IDs, etc.”

    Comment from 18 Jul 2026 in “Gleam Is Now on Tangled”
  • Crypto-adjacent origins

    “Radicle seems better in that regards, but instead is on top of their own cryptocurrency”

    Comment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Dutch governments builds alternative for Microsoft based on NixOS”

    “the fact that this started as Crypto-adjacent should have immediately disqualified them for serious use”

    Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

Other Git forges people recommend

The four most recommended other Git forges, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Radicle compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
GitHub7642,35025%1211 yrs47 owners—
Forgejo3806785%121 yr26 ownersApproved
GitLab33134649%126 yrs41 owners—
Codeberg33127754%121 yr17 owners—
RadicleThis page954170%126 mo4 ownersApproved
See all 22 Git forges, ranked

What people said

40 of the 183 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“the sweet spot in federated git hosting could be a system merging the features of tangled with the features of radicle”

RecommendsComment from 30 Oct 2026 in “The federated code forge”

“Radicle seems better in that regards, but instead is on top of their own cryptocurrency”

MixedComment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Dutch governments builds alternative for Microsoft based on NixOS”

“This is amateur hour, and they are not serious about their purported secure and private platform.”

CriticizesComment from 24 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“Is it embarrassing that their private feature was broken? Sure. But it's for the most part a publishing platform.”

MixedComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“you should stop and look for someone who does to check your system in the real world before you tell people to depend on it”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“"Your Data, Forever and Secure" in big bold letters on their homepage with total disregard for the truth of that statement”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“If a core feature of your software requires security guarantees you can't just say they don't have a "security team"”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“the fact that this started as Crypto-adjacent should have immediately disqualified them for serious use”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“they were depending on libraries (both by Cyphernet, interestingly) and implicitly trusting them, instead of verifying.”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“How do you not notice that cross-node traffic is not encrypted when building something like this?”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“This whole project reads like amateur hour. Still using curl pipe to shell install and everything.”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“announcement 3 months later is not super great, considering that the current advice is "Stop using private repositories (over the network) until the security update is released."”

CriticizesComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Radicle: Disclosure of Vulnerability in the Network Protocol”

“If one node goes down, users can still access the same issues/PRs from another endpoint.”

RecommendsComment from 27 Aug 2026 in “We found a division by zero bug in FFmpeg with a vibecoded fuzzer”

“Instead of creating one more centralized alternative, it's best to invest all effort into a decentralized solution”

RecommendsComment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Cursor launches Origin, GitHub alternative”

“With Radicle you can continue to work locally with all issues etc intact, even if your main host is down.”

RecommendsComment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

“where they manage issues/prs/user identities as git objects, so your entire project is self contained as git repository”

RecommendsComment from 1 Aug 2026 in “GitHub has alternatives, but no replacement”

“is a great descriptive name which instantly conveys a lot of information about what it is and does”

MixedComment from 25 Jul 2026 in “Bitchat Is Now on Radicle”

“Maybe it will push more people and more effort into the true decentralization”

RecommendsComment from 24 Jul 2026 in “Codeberg Divides”

“These p2p solutions are more like bittorrent where you can clone as long as someone is seeding”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jul 2026 in “Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects”

“provides self-hosting with decentralized mirrors for both added availability and DDoS resistance”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jul 2026 in “Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects”

“The social / coordination control-plane angle is really thin, following users and repos goes by opaque IDs, etc.”

MixedComment from 18 Jul 2026 in “Gleam Is Now on Tangled”

“This looks like a much more sensible design for code repos: all the artifacts live in the repo.”

RecommendsComment from 18 Jul 2026 in “Gleam Is Now on Tangled”

“Works great. I setup several skills for agent harnesses and they use radicle + jj + git perfectly.”

RecommendsComment from 17 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”

“There's no structural separation of public / private repositories; this is one bug or fat-finger away from a leak.”

CriticizesComment from 16 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”

“Radicle is protocol driven, my hope as a contributor is it becomes infrastructure.”

RecommendsComment from 15 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”

“This is a good fit primarily if you want to run a Radicle node that only seeds repos you tell it to.”

RecommendsComment from 15 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”

“We should rather host it on a public, peer-to-peer network that everyone can have access to.”

RecommendsComment from 15 May 2026 in “Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git”

“Another good contender is the Radicle which is completely decentralized on top of the Git.”

RecommendsComment from 13 May 2026 in “Why I'm leaving GitHub for Forgejo”

“Its pretty much exactly what is being asked for here. The main issue I see is its impossible to search through peoples projects”

MixedComment from 1 May 2026 in “Tangled – We need a federation of forges”

“Even if half of these go down, I still have full access to all the repos I follow.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

“Radicle is local-first, so you can create issues and patches (pull requests) even when offline.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

“the main benefit is that everything continues working even though HardenedBSDs official seed is down”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

“Radicle is a legit project that has been around for at least 5 years trying to solve a pretty hard problem.”

MixedComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “HardenedBSD Is Now Officially on Radicle”

“issue data is as important as the code so we should treat it with the same care as the code”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub”

“Owned by companies that do not help the US Federal Government illegally spy on their own citizens and murder children overseas”

RecommendsComment from 23 Mar 2026 in “GitHub appears to be struggling with measly three nines availability”

“which can be used to develop git-based projects (including issues etc) in a distributed manner”

RecommendsComment from 20 Mar 2026 in “Store birth date in systemd for age verification”

“The pitch is compelling; if the project home page shows that index, I can see a world where this takes the reigns from Github.”

MixedComment from 23 Jan 2026 in “Radicle: The Sovereign Forge”

“It also enables others to send patches, without first having to create an account on that Raspberry Pi in your pantry.”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jan 2026 in “Radicle: The Sovereign Forge”

“Every time I read about an emulation or file sharing project kicked off of GitHub, I think: should have used Radicle.”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jan 2026 in “Radicle: The Sovereign Forge”

“3 of the most exciting decentralized GitHub alternatives being developed today”

RecommendsComment from 3 Dec 2025 in “Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.