Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Quint

Hacker Approved

Specification language in Developer tools

A free formal specification language based on TLA+, praised for simple syntax, good tooling, and as a checkable layer between specs and AI-written code.

A free formal specification language based on TLA+, praised for simple syntax, good tooling, and as a checkable layer between specs and AI-written code.

10 people gave an opinion

recommend it
10
criticize it
0
approval share
100%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 7 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 10 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 7 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Intermediate layer for AI coding

    “the concept of 'executable spec' is definitely the direction to go in the age of AI vibe coding”

    Comment from 24 Mar 2026 in “Executable Specs for Reliable Systems”

    “I really helps to have an intermediate layer between natural language specs and code.”

    Comment from 18 Oct 2026 in “An executable specification language based on temporal logic of actions (TLA)”

    “I'll ask it to write a formal model of the state in Quint”

    Comment from 24 Jul 2026 in “Why Software Factories Fail”
  • Simple syntax, easy to learn

    “It has an easier syntax closer to functional programming language and doesn't require a big investment learning the syntax”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “Intro to TLA+ for the LLM Era: Prompt Your Way to Victory”

    “Easier syntax to learn so you are actually collaborating instead of relying on hope.”

    Comment from 19 May 2026 in “Intro to TLA+ for the LLM Era: Prompt Your Way to Victory”

    “It comes with simple syntax and very good developer tooling.”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “What TLA+ can and can't check”
  • Good developer tooling

    “with delightful tooling based on the temporal logic of actions (TLA)”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “What TLA+ can and can't check”

    “It comes with simple syntax and very good developer tooling.”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “What TLA+ can and can't check”
  • Strong testing and verification layer

    “Make sure the specifications can’t fail by verifying them for correctness.”

    Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Creusot helps you prove your Rust code is correct”

    “It's a strong testing layer.”

    Comment from 10 Apr 2026 in “Model-Based Testing for Dungeons & Dragons”

What people recommend instead

The same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Quint compared with 1 alternative
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
TLA+741980%127 mo5 ownersApproved
QuintThis page100100%7—Approved

What people said

12 of the 13 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“I really helps to have an intermediate layer between natural language specs and code.”

RecommendsComment from 18 Oct 2026 in “An executable specification language based on temporal logic of actions (TLA)”

“It comes with simple syntax and very good developer tooling.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “What TLA+ can and can't check”

“with delightful tooling based on the temporal logic of actions (TLA)”

RecommendsComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “What TLA+ can and can't check”

“A lot of transaction and atomic bugs were found and fixed just by having such simple instruction alone.”

RecommendsComment from 27 Sep 2026 in “The internet discovers TLA+. Now what?”

“I'll ask it to write a formal model of the state in Quint”

RecommendsComment from 24 Jul 2026 in “Why Software Factories Fail”

“Make sure the specifications can’t fail by verifying them for correctness.”

RecommendsComment from 28 May 2026 in “Creusot helps you prove your Rust code is correct”

“It has an easier syntax closer to functional programming language and doesn't require a big investment learning the syntax”

RecommendsComment from 21 May 2026 in “Intro to TLA+ for the LLM Era: Prompt Your Way to Victory”

“Easier syntax to learn so you are actually collaborating instead of relying on hope.”

RecommendsComment from 19 May 2026 in “Intro to TLA+ for the LLM Era: Prompt Your Way to Victory”

“It's a strong testing layer.”

RecommendsComment from 10 Apr 2026 in “Model-Based Testing for Dungeons & Dragons”

“It worked and proved to also be a great LLM self-checker.”

RecommendsComment from 7 Apr 2026 in “Model-Based Testing for Dungeons & Dragons”

“the concept of 'executable spec' is definitely the direction to go in the age of AI vibe coding”

RecommendsComment from 24 Mar 2026 in “Executable Specs for Reliable Systems”

“it worked out much better than we imagined”

RecommendsComment from 17 Dec 2025 in “AI will make formal verification go mainstream”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.