Hacker ApprovedDepartments

PgQue

Shares rank 10 of 19 message brokers by recommenders

Postgres-based queue that gives durable messaging without running Kafka or RabbitMQ, built on an insert-only event table to avoid bloat. Critics doubt the zero-bloat claim.

Postgres-based queue that gives durable messaging without running Kafka or RabbitMQ, built on an insert-only event table to avoid bloat. Critics doubt the zero-bloat claim.

10 people gave an opinion

recommend it
8
criticize it
2
approval share
80%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 4 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 8 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 4 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Bloat-free insert-only event design

    “operates bloat-free (one of the largest operational hurdles in queue-like Postgres workloads)”

    Comment from 1 May 2026 in “Does Postgres Scale?”

    “active event table is INSERT-only. Each consumer remembers its own pointer”

    Comment from 19 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”
  • Well-designed, interesting trade-offs

    “the different approach is refreshing to see and interesting for different system trade off”

    Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Just Use Postgres for Durable Workflows”

    “it seems really well-designed”

    Comment from 30 Jul 2026 in “Postgres Queues Actually Scale”
  • Polished tooling around Postgres queues

    “There's great projects like https://github.com/NikolayS/pgque and https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/4/4/absurd-in-production/ that give you even some tooling around that.”

    Comment from 24 Jun 2026 in “PostgreSQL Is Enough”

    “Something like pgque would have made that much more polished.”

    Comment from 5 Jun 2026 in “pg_durable: Microsoft open sources in-database durable execution”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Zero-bloat claim questioned

    “the idea of considering a queue built inside a database to be "zero bloat" leaves me scratching my head”

    Comment from 18 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

Other message brokers people recommend

The four most recommended other message brokers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

PgQue compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Apache Kafka535549%12——
NATS341668%97.5 yrs3 ownersApproved
Amazon SQS181456%8——
Redpanda17481%7—Approved
PgQueThis page8280%4——
See all 19 message brokers, ranked

What people said

All 10 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“it seems really well-designed”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jul 2026 in “Postgres Queues Actually Scale”

“There's great projects like https://github.com/NikolayS/pgque and https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/4/4/absurd-in-production/ that give you even some tooling around that.”

RecommendsComment from 24 Jun 2026 in “PostgreSQL Is Enough”

“Something like pgque would have made that much more polished.”

RecommendsComment from 5 Jun 2026 in “pg_durable: Microsoft open sources in-database durable execution”

“the different approach is refreshing to see and interesting for different system trade off”

RecommendsComment from 29 May 2026 in “Just Use Postgres for Durable Workflows”

“operates bloat-free (one of the largest operational hurdles in queue-like Postgres workloads)”

RecommendsComment from 1 May 2026 in “Does Postgres Scale?”

“I'm thinking this thru, and will likely rename”

CriticizesComment from 19 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

“It's not really solving the problems you claim it solves.”

CriticizesComment from 19 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

“active event table is INSERT-only. Each consumer remembers its own pointer”

RecommendsComment from 19 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

“Postgres durability without having to run Kafka or RabbitMQ clusters seems pretty enticing”

RecommendsComment from 18 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

“the idea of considering a queue built inside a database to be "zero bloat" leaves me scratching my head”

MixedComment from 18 Apr 2026 in “PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.