Raku (Perl 6)
Shares rank 133 of 163 programming languages by recommenders
People recommend Raku for its expressiveness and many nice features. Critics say the long Perl 6 development period delayed the language and hurt the Perl community.
People recommend Raku for its expressiveness and many nice features. Critics say the long Perl 6 development period delayed the language and hurt the Perl community.
45 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 6
- criticize it
- 39
- approval share
- 13%
Recommended in 4 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: not recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: not recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 6 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
- 0.1 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Expressive, with many nice features
“For me, expressiveness is fundamental. And perl 6 gives me that.”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” “It certainly has lots of nice features, too.”
Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Decade-long development delayed the language
“it needed them delivered in smaller chunks over the years rather than as a big decade long”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” “perl 6 was delayed and that might have hurt the language”
Comment from 8 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural” “The extremely wishy washy and decade long development track they put themselves on finally destroyed any notion of ever even returning to Perl.”
Comment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural” - Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural”
- Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural”
- Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
Break from Perl 5 hurt community
“The long period of time between perl 5 development stopping and perl 6/Raku being ready for production made the transition much, much rougher”
Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” “Perl 6 did massive damage to the community mainly because it was so different that it looked like a fantasy language.”
Comment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural” “The insane lead time of Perl 6 to even get to a point of backwards incompatibility was it for me.”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” - Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
- Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
Years without a working implementation
“no implementation of a language that anyone felt comfortable using for any real development”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” “developed for years without an actual implementation to keep them grounded”
Comment from 6 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural” Overpromised, poorly managed project
“disastrously optimistic declaration about soon-to-be major uprgade to Perl 6 which in reality will take 15+ years”
Comment from 7 Dec 2025 in “Perl's decline was cultural” “It was so disappointing to watch them bike shed Perl 6 endlessly while Python was gradually taking over.”
Comment from 20 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” “"PERL6 will be gloriously filled with rainbows, butterflies, will be backwards incompatible”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?” - Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “What Killed Perl?”
Other programming languages people recommend
The four most recommended other programming languages, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 163 programming languages, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 51 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“Which gave up and became its own language, its own level of confusion.”
“What might be considered as a failure case is Perl 5 -> Perl 6”
“Perl 6 was terribly planned and took bloody ages to get anywhere.”
“they gave up on Perl 6, admitted it was a mistake, and renamed all that work”
“Perl 6 showed what happens when you do something like that.”
“the Perl 6 redesign took so long that many people gave up”
“perl 6 was delayed and that might have hurt the language”
“disastrously optimistic declaration about soon-to-be major uprgade to Perl 6 which in reality will take 15+ years”
“perl6 helped kill it by making perl5 stagnate”
“The extremely wishy washy and decade long development track they put themselves on finally destroyed any notion of ever even returning to Perl.”
“developed for years without an actual implementation to keep them grounded”
“Perl 6 did massive damage to the community mainly because it was so different that it looked like a fantasy language.”
“Perl 6 was a wall that Perl 5 would never move beyond.”
“just to wait for Perl 6, which never came”
“It was so disappointing to watch them bike shed Perl 6 endlessly while Python was gradually taking over.”
“the project was so badly managed that it killed off both Perl 5 and Perl 6”
“It certainly has lots of nice features, too.”
“The long period of time between perl 5 development stopping and perl 6/Raku being ready for production made the transition much, much rougher”
“Perl 6 would have been named Rapture or Raku from day one, Perl would have been fine.”
“Perl6 basically did not exist for real for many, many years”
“For me, expressiveness is fundamental. And perl 6 gives me that.”
“But it insists on living online which necessitates a hosted search function. Which is always broken.”
“the perl 6 mess and associated sentiment made it look worse.”
“I still don't get it. It's still a problem.”
“the documentation's search function is regularly broken”
“Then he kept adding more shiny things and I lost interest.”
“That was some self-inflicted damage.”
“A crazy jump that was Perl 6 was not survivable, even though Raku may be a fine language.”
“"PERL6 will be gloriously filled with rainbows, butterflies, will be backwards incompatible”
“says more about perl 6's insane development schedule than python's advantages”
“The insane lead time of Perl 6 to even get to a point of backwards incompatibility was it for me.”
“no implementation of a language that anyone felt comfortable using for any real development”
“it needed them delivered in smaller chunks over the years rather than as a big decade long”
“Why they didn't do that with 6 was entirely bizarre.”
“Perl 6 was developed in a way that didn't address the broad concerns of the Perl community”
“the confusion around 6 completely destroyed almost everyone's enthusiasm”
“The backwards incompatibility of Perl 6 absolutely killed Perl.”
“As history has shown, this didn't work out well for anyone”
“Perl 6 development went on for a very long time and got nothing but bad press”
“all the talent and effort started being wasted on making Perl 6 the bestest”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.