Hacker ApprovedDepartments

parking_lot

Shares rank 7 of 8 Rust crates by recommenders

Recommended as a small, fast mutex with no lock poisoning, making fine-grained locking practical. Critics say its performance gains are small and it lacks priority-inversion support.

Recommended as a small, fast mutex with no lock poisoning, making fine-grained locking practical. Critics say its performance gains are small and it lacks priority-inversion support.

8 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
criticize it
3
approval share
63%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 1 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 1.6 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

Other Rust crates people recommend

The four most recommended other Rust crates, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

parking_lot compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
anyhow (Rust crate)341077%5—Approved
Rayon18290%10—Approved
thiserror16867%5—Approved
rand crate9375%4——
parking_lotThis page5363%1——
See all 8 Rust crates, ranked

What people said

9 of the 10 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“It does not offer the main benefit you're describing.”

CriticizesComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“Not impossible. One way to do this is to just use parking_lot directly.”

RecommendsComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“They had to work pretty hard to find a scenario in which `parking_lot` did much better in any performance metrics.”

CriticizesComment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“most libraries and allocations that are ok with allocation should use parking_lot mutexes”

MixedComment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“its performance is stellar, and it doesn't have the poisoning insanity to deal with”

RecommendsComment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“IMHO that's a very cool feature which is essentially wasted when using it as a `Mutex `”

MixedComment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“The main benefit of parking lot is that it makes locks very small, which then encourages the use of fine grained locking.”

RecommendsComment from 24 Nov 2025 in “Inside Rust's std and parking_lot mutexes – who wins?”

“I believe parking lot doesn't have this problem.”

RecommendsComment from 19 Nov 2025 in “Ditch your mutex, you deserve better”

“it has no way of getting notified when the mutex gets unblocked nor does it support priority inversion”

CriticizesComment from 18 Nov 2025 in “Ditch your mutex, you deserve better”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.