Onshape
Hacker ApprovedRanked 3 of 27 CAD software by recommenders
Browser-based parametric CAD that is easy to learn, runs on any machine and has multi-user editing; the free tier makes designs public.
Browser-based parametric CAD that is easy to learn, runs on any machine and has multi-user editing; the free tier makes designs public.
86 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 65
- criticize it
- 21
- approval share
- 76%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 65 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 3.1 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Runs in browser, no install
“The user interface and documentation are stellar and you don't need to install anything to get started.”
Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “3D-Printed Mathematical Lampshades” “Depending on your needs, Onshape could be a good portable option since it runs in a browser.”
Comment from 10 Apr 2026 in “How Microsoft Abuses Its Users” “One of the reasons that I switched to OnShape recently is that I can run it on my MacBook.”
Comment from 31 Dec 2025 in “2025 was a disaster for Windows 11 as bugs and intrusive features erode trust” - Comment from 18 Nov 2025 in “Blender 5.0”
- Comment from 27 Apr 2026 in “After three months on Linux, I don't miss Windows at all”
Easy to learn, approachable
“after 10+ years with SolidWorks I switched to OnShape. A small learning curve but now I enjoy it just as much.”
Comment from 28 Jan 2026 in “Microsoft forced me to switch to Linux” “Learning to make simple parts in onshape is pretty darn easy (and fun).”
Comment from 22 May 2026 in “Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark” “modern CAD software, like Onshape or Fusion 360 is quite easy to learn”
Comment from 20 Dec 2025 in “OpenSCAD is kinda neat” - Comment from 1 Apr 2026 in “Open source CAD in the browser (Solvespace)”
- Comment from 20 Dec 2025 in “OpenSCAD is kinda neat”
Clean, intuitive user interface
“The user interface and documentation are stellar and you don't need to install anything to get started.”
Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “3D-Printed Mathematical Lampshades” “The multi-user editing is first class and personally I find the user interface more intuitive”
Comment from 13 Jan 2026 in “Show HN: AI in SolidWorks” “viewport manipulation behaves in a very similar way to onshape which feels very natural to me”
Comment from 31 Mar 2026 in “Open source CAD in the browser (Solvespace)” - Comment from 7 Mar 2026 in “QGIS 4.0”
Free for public designs
“OnShape has been a godsend, and keeping it free for open designs is one of the better ethical stances to take.”
Comment from 8 Feb 2026 in “Microsoft Account bugs locked me out of Notepad – are Thin Clients ruining PCs?” “The free tier is identical to the standard tier except you can not create private documents”
Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Simple Screw Counter” “It's free to use provided that you're okay with your design being public.”
Comment from 20 Dec 2025 in “OpenSCAD is kinda neat” - Comment from 5 Oct 2026 in “ArtCraft Apps – open-source Adobe compatible suite written in Rust”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Subscription cost is high
“Like Adobe's 'creative' software and Onshape, they are working as hard as possible to make YOU pay more to have less.”
Comment from 13 May 2026 in “Restore full BambuNetwork support for Bambu Lab printers” “a subscription that assumes I have a corporate expense account makes it not viable”
Comment from 12 Jan 2026 in “I dumped Windows 11 for Linux, and you should too” “The licensing cost has a few more digits than GitHub ever did.”
Comment from 30 Jan 2026 in “Vcad: Free BRep CAD in the Browser” - Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “Blender 5.0”
Needs internet, cloud-dependent
“requires an account and internet connection because it streams to your browser”
Comment from 30 Jan 2026 in “Vcad: Free BRep CAD in the Browser” “it's cloud based so you can't run it with a poor connection or no connection”
Comment from 11 Jul 2026 in “FreeCAD in the Browser” “It feels extremely sluggish, probably because it's running on the browser.”
Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “Blender 5.0” Free designs are public
“The free tier is identical to the standard tier except you can not create private documents”
Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Simple Screw Counter” “they both require a phone number and make all of your files public”
Comment from 18 Nov 2025 in “Blender 5.0” Distrust of vendor, proprietary
“onshape is nice feature-wise but then you're just trusting a different group”
Comment from 13 Jan 2026 in “Show HN: AI in SolidWorks” “even after onshape shafted everyone which should have highlighted the risks”
Comment from 19 Jul 2026 in “Blender 5.2 LTS” “too undocumented and proprietary to be of much use”
Comment from 1 May 2026 in “Show HN: AI CAD Harness”
Other CAD software people recommend
The four most recommended other CAD software, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FreeCAD | 199 | 95 | 68% | 12 | 2 yrs13 owners | Approved |
| OpenSCAD | 173 | 87 | 66% | 12 | 9 yrs4 owners | — |
| OnshapeThis page | 65 | 21 | 76% | 12 | — | Approved |
| Autodesk Fusion 360 | 60 | 37 | 62% | 12 | — | — |
| SolveSpace | 37 | 12 | 76% | 10 | — | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 92 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“onshape is pretty respectable, and the free offering is decent”
“I've had great success designing durable objects using the sheet metal modeler in OnShape”
“even after onshape shafted everyone which should have highlighted the risks”
“it's cloud based so you can't run it with a poor connection or no connection”
“It's a professional system from the founders of Solidworks that competes with all the top CAD tools.”
“Learning to make simple parts in onshape is pretty darn easy (and fun).”
“Like Adobe's 'creative' software and Onshape, they are working as hard as possible to make YOU pay more to have less.”
“too undocumented and proprietary to be of much use”
“It seems pretty powerful so far and I've not found anything I can't do with it.”
“I'll do it in Onshape rather than booting up my Windows VM”
“I'm often surprised how good it is at matching up faces after a single operation”
“Between that and FreeCad (which recently got a usability update) I can probably kick AutoCad/Fusion360 to the curb.”
“Depending on your needs, Onshape could be a good portable option since it runs in a browser.”
“OnShape is pretty approachable, and has lots of good tutorial videos.”
“viewport manipulation behaves in a very similar way to onshape which feels very natural to me”
“Onshape was built with versioning and diffing as a first class capability.”
“the insight that OnShape got right is that these scripts automatically become available as possible nodes within the history-based modeller”
“Learn on something more feature-complete and with a less idiosyncratic UI, like Onshape”
“The free tier is identical to the standard tier except you can not create private documents”
“their algorithms are better and break down in much more complex models than FreeCAD”
“OnShape has been a godsend, and keeping it free for open designs is one of the better ethical stances to take.”
“requires an account and internet connection because it streams to your browser”
“The licensing cost has a few more digits than GitHub ever did.”
“The user interface and documentation are stellar and you don't need to install anything to get started.”
“after 10+ years with SolidWorks I switched to OnShape. A small learning curve but now I enjoy it just as much.”
“PTC OnShape, Siemens Solid Edge, Autodesk Fusion) have usable free tiers available.”
“learned used ACAD 3D, Inventor, Pro-E, Solidworks, Fusion 360, Onshape, Siemens NX”
“onshape is nice feature-wise but then you're just trusting a different group”
“The multi-user editing is first class and personally I find the user interface more intuitive”
“a subscription that assumes I have a corporate expense account makes it not viable”
“One of the reasons that I switched to OnShape recently is that I can run it on my MacBook.”
“It's free to use provided that you're okay with your design being public.”
“I found Fusion 360 and Onshape very intuitive to learn.”
“modern CAD software, like Onshape or Fusion 360 is quite easy to learn”
“the functions, constraints and geometry kernel weren't as powerful as onshape, which I've used a bit”
“It's also pricey, the first paid tier is $1500/year”
“It feels extremely sluggish, probably because it's running on the browser.”
“they both require a phone number and make all of your files public”
“has blown me away with its browser interface and how quick it all loads”
“the parametric modeling system used in fusion and onshape clicked with me and i really enjoy using them”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.