Ollama
Ranked 2 of 27 local LLM runners by recommenders
Recommended for running open models locally with one command, and for its cheap, generous Ollama Cloud plan; critics cite poor defaults, slow new-model support, and locked-in model storage.
Recommended for running open models locally with one command, and for its cheap, generous Ollama Cloud plan; critics cite poor defaults, slow new-model support, and locked-in model storage.
597 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 350
- criticize it
- 247
- approval share
- 59%
Recommended in 12 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 1.5 years
Median of the 8 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 350 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.4 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 12 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
One-command setup, minimal fuss
“The simplest way to really start, use anything like claude code, vs code, cursor, antigratvity, (or any other IDE) ask them to install ollama”
Comment from 14 Mar 2026 in “Can I Run AI locally?” “Core principle being your grandmother should be able to launch local AI model without needing to install 100 dependencies.”
Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “LM Studio 0.4.0” “Ollama makes it 1 command to run local small models, but with the newest ones there can be kinks to work out first.”
Comment from 27 Apr 2026 in “Running Local LLMs Offline on a Ten-Hour Flight” - Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama”
- Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “LM Studio 0.4.0”
- Comment from 19 Dec 2025 in “Firefox will have an option to disable all AI features”
Cheap cloud plan, generous limits
“The worst I saw - multiple parallel agents (opencode & pi-coding agents), with Kimi and glm, almost non stop development during the work day - 15-20% session consumption (I think it's 2h bucket) max. Never hit the limit.”
Comment from 10 Apr 2026 in “Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter” “I've had a decent experience with ollama cloud. It is slower than going thru openrouter but much, much cheaper”
Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5” “Another very cost-effective option is Ollama Cloud. In a month of use, I only hit the 5-hour limit once”
Comment from 3 May 2026 in “DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro, 17x cheaper” - Comment from 11 Jun 2026 in “Notes on DeepSeek”
- Comment from 25 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Anthropic banned me from using Claude Code and I don't know what to do”
- Comment from 15 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?”
- Comment from 9 Apr 2026 in “Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter”
- Comment from 5 Nov 2025 on Hacker News
Easy model swapping, standard API
“the value of ollama is that you can easily download and swap-out different models with the same API”
Comment from 2 Mar 2026 in “Show HN: Timber – Ollama for classical ML models, 336x faster than Python” “Using ollama's api doesn't have the same issue, so I've stuck to using ollama for local development work.”
Comment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Running Google Gemma 4 Locally with LM Studio's New Headless CLI and Claude Code” “I'm using it as the backend for playing with other frontend stuff and it seems to work just fine.”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini” - Comment from 9 Apr 2026 in “Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter”
- Comment from 15 Feb 2026 in “Show HN: Off Grid – Run AI text, image gen, vision offline on your phone”
Good results with open models
“I'm getting some pretty fantastic results running GLM 5.1 and even Minimax 2.7 and Kimi 2.5 and Gemma 4 on Ollama's cloud instances.”
Comment from 13 Apr 2026 in “Pro Max 5x Quota Exhausted in 1.5 Hours Despite Moderate Usage” “I have been using GLM-5.1 with pi.dev through Ollama Cloud for my personal projects and I am very happy with this setup.”
Comment from 21 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: Smarter, Sharper, Still Evolving” “I also like their CLI, because it is simple to use.”
Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama” - Comment from 11 Nov 2025 in “Tongyi DeepResearch – open-source 30B MoE Model that rivals OpenAI DeepResearch”
- Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Bye Bye Copilot – new pricing looks to be a joke”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Bad defaults degrade model quality
“Ollama has had bad defaults forever (stuck on a default CTX of 2048 for like 2 years) and they typically are late to support the latest models vs llamacpp.”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini” “people end up saying "I tried running Qwen 3.8 27b locally and it was dumb" while Ollama would default to a Q4 version of the model”
Comment from 22 Aug 2026 in “Why your local LLM feels dumber than it is” “they try to abstract away a bit too much, especially when LLM model quality is highly affected by a bunch of parameters”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini” - Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama”
- Comment from 13 Jul 2026 in “Getting GLM 5.2 running on my slow computer”
Lags on newest model support
“Ollama has had bad defaults forever (stuck on a default CTX of 2048 for like 2 years) and they typically are late to support the latest models vs llamacpp.”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini” “the lack of variety in quant versions, the lag between availability on Ollama, and their push to get you to use their cloud versions”
Comment from 19 Jul 2026 in “Ollama: All Aboard Open Models” “the impedance mismatch between when models are released and the capability of Ollama and other servers capability for use”
Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama” - Comment from 22 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-27B: Flagship-Level Coding in a 27B Dense Model”
- Comment from 27 Apr 2026 in “Running Local LLMs Offline on a Ten-Hour Flight”
Proprietary storage locks in models
“Ollama made the wonderful choice of trying to replicate Docker registries/layers for the model weights, so of course the models you download with Ollama cannot be easily reused”
Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “LM Studio 0.4.0” “ollama's hashed blob storage means if you've been pulling models for months, switching tools requires re-downloading everything”
Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama” “It's as if Ollama is trying to create a walled garden, but the garden is outside of their property, so all it achieves”
Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama” Downplays its llama.cpp roots
“Ollama's org had people flood various LLM/programming related Reddits and Discords and elsewhere, claiming it was an 'easy frontend for llama.cpp', and tricked people.”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini” “Ollama could have advertised better that llama.cpp was it's original backend, but were they obligated to?”
Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Stop Using Ollama” “The local LLM ecosystem doesn’t need Ollama. It needs llama.cpp. The rest is packaging, and better packaging already exists.”
Comment from 19 Jul 2026 in “Ollama: All Aboard Open Models”
Other local LLM runners people recommend
The four most recommended other local LLM runners, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llama.cpp | 471 | 109 | 81% | 13 | 1 yr4 owners | Approved |
| OllamaThis page | 350 | 247 | 59% | 12 | 1.5 yrs8 owners | — |
| LM Studio | 217 | 74 | 75% | 12 | 3 yrs4 owners | Approved |
| DS4 by antirez | 109 | 20 | 84% | 7 | 1 mo3 owners | Approved |
| Unsloth Studio | 94 | 27 | 78% | 11 | — | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 749 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“people end up saying "I tried running Qwen 3.8 27b locally and it was dumb" while Ollama would default to a Q4 version of the model”
“The local LLM ecosystem doesn’t need Ollama. It needs llama.cpp. The rest is packaging, and better packaging already exists.”
“the lack of variety in quant versions, the lag between availability on Ollama, and their push to get you to use their cloud versions”
“the default one can't even reach my prompt in opencode, it's pushed out by all the pre- and post-amble”
“$20/month gives you something on par with Opus (if not better) with quotas so high I'm yet to hit.”
“A $20/month subscription to Ollama-cloud gets me good coverage of consults out to frontier models”
“Ollama cloud is also a fantastic deal. They also don't have a monthly limit, just session and weekly.”
“these run mostly on cpu as my 3080 cannot load those with more than 10gb but the cpu speed is amazing”
“Another very cost-effective option is Ollama Cloud. In a month of use, I only hit the 5-hour limit once”
“I've had a decent experience with ollama cloud. It is slower than going thru openrouter but much, much cheaper”
“Ollama makes it 1 command to run local small models, but with the newest ones there can be kinks to work out first.”
“There was this huge bug that prevented me from using a model in ollama and it took them four months for a "vendor sync"”
“I have been using GLM-5.1 with pi.dev through Ollama Cloud for my personal projects and I am very happy with this setup.”
“the impedance mismatch between when models are released and the capability of Ollama and other servers capability for use”
“The fact criticized in TFA, that the Ollama "curated" list can be misleading about the characteristics of the models, is a very serious criticism”
“I like Ollama Cloud service (I'm paid pro user), because it let me test several open source LLMs very fast”
“I also like their CLI, because it is simple to use.”
“ollama's hashed blob storage means if you've been pulling models for months, switching tools requires re-downloading everything”
“Ollama could have advertised better that llama.cpp was it's original backend, but were they obligated to?”
“It's as if Ollama is trying to create a walled garden, but the garden is outside of their property, so all it achieves”
“It makes a bunch of decisions for you so you don't have to think much to get a model up and running.”
“I'm getting some pretty fantastic results running GLM 5.1 and even Minimax 2.7 and Kimi 2.5 and Gemma 4 on Ollama's cloud instances.”
“The worst I saw - multiple parallel agents (opencode & pi-coding agents), with Kimi and glm, almost non stop development during the work day - 15-20% session consumption (I think it's 2h bucket) max. Never hit the limit.”
“Ollama usage limits insane high, no limits where to use (has normal APIs), privacy and no logging”
“Using ollama's api doesn't have the same issue, so I've stuck to using ollama for local development work.”
“they try to abstract away a bit too much, especially when LLM model quality is highly affected by a bunch of parameters”
“Ollama has had bad defaults forever (stuck on a default CTX of 2048 for like 2 years) and they typically are late to support the latest models vs llamacpp.”
“I'm using it as the backend for playing with other frontend stuff and it seems to work just fine.”
“Ollama's org had people flood various LLM/programming related Reddits and Discords and elsewhere, claiming it was an 'easy frontend for llama.cpp', and tricked people.”
“The simplest way to really start, use anything like claude code, vs code, cursor, antigratvity, (or any other IDE) ask them to install ollama”
“the value of ollama is that you can easily download and swap-out different models with the same API”
“set up Ollama + any of the generation tools here and hook them into OpenWebUI to get something pretty close to what you'd get on a cloud AI chatbox”
“The local dev instruction is to install ollama and use it to pull the models and set some env vars.”
“Core principle being your grandmother should be able to launch local AI model without needing to install 100 dependencies.”
“Ollama made the wonderful choice of trying to replicate Docker registries/layers for the model weights, so of course the models you download with Ollama cannot be easily reused”
“An 8B Ollama model installed on a middle of the road MacBook can do this effortlessly today without whirring.”
“Ollama is better than even Claude imho for just text processing but doesn't seem to have anything that can actually act on a system.”
“Ollama at its defaults with qwen3:30b-a3b has 256k context size and does ~27 tokens/sec on pure CPU”
“Ollama running locally paired occasionally with using Ollama Cloud when required is a nice option if you use it enough”
“I have twice signed up and paid $20/month for Ollama Cloud, love the service, but use it so rarely”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.