Hacker ApprovedDepartments

ocicl

Shares rank 33 of 35 package managers by recommenders

Common Lisp package manager that people prefer over Quicklisp for managing dependencies, though one critic says it fixes packaging without rethinking it.

Common Lisp package manager that people prefer over Quicklisp for managing dependencies, though one critic says it fixes packaging without rethinking it.

5 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
criticize it
0
approval share
100%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 3 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Preferred over Quicklisp

    “I think OCICL will meet your expectations more readily than Quicklisp”

    Comment from 18 Jul 2026 in “A Road to Lisp: Which Lisp”

    “compared to OCICL it kinda feels ancient”

    Comment from 11 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Does little to rethink packaging

    “it's fixing the existing packaging, but not doing much to rethink it”

    Comment from 13 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

Other package managers people recommend

The four most recommended other package managers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

ocicl compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Nix37815072%133 yrs24 ownersApproved
Homebrew27117561%1210 yrs13 owners—
npm16146126%12——
pnpm1242484%125 yrs4 ownersApproved
ociclThis page50100%3——
See all 35 package managers, ranked

What people said

All 6 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“ocicl[2] (heavily AI-assisted recently)”

RecommendsComment from 26 Aug 2026 in “A curmudgeon tries a language server”

“I think OCICL will meet your expectations more readily than Quicklisp”

RecommendsComment from 18 Jul 2026 in “A Road to Lisp: Which Lisp”

“it's fixing the existing packaging, but not doing much to rethink it”

MixedComment from 13 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

“It does all of this and more.”

RecommendsComment from 12 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

“You can pin dependencies with Qlot or Ocicl”

RecommendsComment from 11 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

“compared to OCICL it kinda feels ancient”

RecommendsComment from 11 Dec 2025 in “Common Lisp, ASDF, and Quicklisp: packaging explained”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.