Hacker ApprovedDepartments

OpenAI o3

Hacker Approved

The most recommended of 4 reasoning models

People recommend o3 for analytical, medical and coding questions, where it gave fewer wrong or nonsensical answers. The common caveat is that o3 Pro is slow and expensive.

People recommend o3 for analytical, medical and coding questions, where it gave fewer wrong or nonsensical answers. The common caveat is that o3 Pro is slow and expensive.

50 people gave an opinion

recommend it
37
criticize it
13
approval share
74%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 11 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 37 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 2.8 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Strong at identifying places from images

    “5.5 is significantly worse than o3 at geo-guessing”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

    “O3 has been excellent at identifying unknown finds”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

    “also give the correct answer (without web search)”

    Comment from 7 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”
  • Detailed, thorough answers on first try

    “80% of the thoroughness with 20% of the time, which tended to be better overall”

    Comment from 25 Feb 2026 in “Mercury 2: The fastest reasoning LLM, powered by diffusion”

    “o3 is getting it no problem, first try, a simple and reasonable answer”

    Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT”

    “after 15 minutes it returned with the answer that had taken me hours”

    Comment from 7 Jun 2026 in “What was your "Oh Shit" moment with GenAI?”
  • Strong at coding and Rust

    “Since O3, which is the first one that really started to understand Rust's borrow checker in my experience.”

    Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3”

    “Its the secret sauce behind why the current models are so great at coding”

    Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Rich Sutton on AI creativity and discovery”

    “o3 was the best at the programming tasks I do”

    Comment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on employment or productivity”
  • Fewer wrong or nonsensical answers

    “It gives me fewer flat-out wrong or nonsensical responses.”

    Comment from 14 Jan 2026 on Hacker News

    “o3 did a notably better job at a lot of analytical prompts”

    Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT”

    “o3 is a much better model for me than GPT5 on any setting”

    Comment from 5 Nov 2025 on Hacker News

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Slow and expensive to run

    “o3 pro is very slow and expensive”

    Comment from 21 Nov 2025 in “Kagi Assistants”

    “o3 actually costs $350 per hour (more than the human price) to achieve tasks at its full 1.5 hour task horizon.”

    Comment from 18 Apr 2026 in “Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? (2025)”

    “That's orders of magnitude cheaper than OpenAI o3 and qualitatively in a different league.”

    Comment from 31 Jan 2026 in “I Build a Open Source Deep Research Engine Wich Beats Google and Open AI”
  • Overhyped claims about its abilities

    “the meta around AI is not rigorous reporting on the nuance of capabilities but bold claims that are easy to retweet”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

    “I remember reading breathless threads about how o3 was going to single-handedly end white collar work”

    Comment from 1 Sep 2026 in “How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?”

    “showed they were not that good at it.”

    Comment from 27 May 2026 in “GPT 5.5 aces 20x20 multiplication that o3 couldn't handle”
  • Overreaches and misreports its methods

    “then when it responded claimed to recognize the visuals of the mountain”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

    “o3 was cheating — it pulled location data, then lied about it.”

    Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

Other reasoning models people recommend

The three most recommended other reasoning models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

OpenAI o3 compared with 3 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
OpenAI o3This page371374%11—Approved
VibeThinker 3B281074%4—Approved
DeepSeek R1251563%10——
OpenAI o1121055%7——
See all 4 reasoning models, ranked

What people said

40 of the 57 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“three big jumps in LLM capability: o3, opus 4.6, and opus 5.5”

RecommendsComment from 26 Oct 2026 in “IBM CEO says open weight models are now good and cheap on-prem”

“o3 is a black hole you can talk to, and it only gave information back if there was something to give back”

RecommendsComment from 29 Sep 2026 in “Dots: Always-on agents”

“I remember reading breathless threads about how o3 was going to single-handedly end white collar work”

CriticizesComment from 1 Sep 2026 in “How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?”

“also give the correct answer (without web search)”

RecommendsComment from 7 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”

“OpenAI's o3, o1 and 4.1 get it right first try”

RecommendsComment from 7 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”

“they all found it instantly with search disabled”

RecommendsComment from 6 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”

“Its the secret sauce behind why the current models are so great at coding”

RecommendsComment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Rich Sutton on AI creativity and discovery”

“after 15 minutes it returned with the answer that had taken me hours”

RecommendsComment from 7 Jun 2026 in “What was your "Oh Shit" moment with GenAI?”

“showed they were not that good at it.”

CriticizesComment from 27 May 2026 in “GPT 5.5 aces 20x20 multiplication that o3 couldn't handle”

“O3 has been excellent at identifying unknown finds”

RecommendsComment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

“then when it responded claimed to recognize the visuals of the mountain”

CriticizesComment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

“o3 was cheating — it pulled location data, then lied about it.”

CriticizesComment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

“5.5 is significantly worse than o3 at geo-guessing”

RecommendsComment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

“the meta around AI is not rigorous reporting on the nuance of capabilities but bold claims that are easy to retweet”

CriticizesComment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”

“Exactly the same argument was made about o3-preview, lol.”

MixedComment from 11 May 2026 in “Mythos Finds a Curl Vulnerability”

“that's when it might be worth paying for o3/Claude Opus class models”

RecommendsComment from 18 Apr 2026 in “I'm Coding by Hand”

“surpassed by o3 at over $100/hr”

MixedComment from 18 Apr 2026 in “Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? (2025)”

“o3 actually costs $350 per hour (more than the human price) to achieve tasks at its full 1.5 hour task horizon.”

CriticizesComment from 18 Apr 2026 in “Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? (2025)”

“for non-coding prompts I still far prefer o3 even if it's considered a legacy model”

RecommendsComment from 3 Mar 2026 in “GPT‑5.3 Instant”

“if you use older models (5.1 instant or o3) you get a ton of detail”

RecommendsComment from 1 Mar 2026 in “Switch to Claude Without Starting Over”

“80% of the thoroughness with 20% of the time, which tended to be better overall”

RecommendsComment from 25 Feb 2026 in “Mercury 2: The fastest reasoning LLM, powered by diffusion”

“o3 was the best at the programming tasks I do”

RecommendsComment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on employment or productivity”

“That's orders of magnitude cheaper than OpenAI o3 and qualitatively in a different league.”

CriticizesComment from 31 Jan 2026 in “I Build a Open Source Deep Research Engine Wich Beats Google and Open AI”

“it's full of bugs, showing JSON all the time while thinking”

MixedComment from 30 Jan 2026 in “Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT”

“o3 did a notably better job at a lot of analytical prompts”

RecommendsComment from 29 Jan 2026 in “Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT”

“around the time of o1/o3/Gemini 2.5 was when things changed and I haven't looked back since”

RecommendsComment from 25 Jan 2026 in “AI Tribalism”

“It gives me fewer flat-out wrong or nonsensical responses.”

RecommendsComment from 14 Jan 2026 on Hacker News

“an astonishing model punching far above the weights (ahem) of models that came after”

RecommendsComment from 13 Jan 2026 in “Anthropic Made a Big Mistake”

“for me, o3 was the first sign of true "intelligence"”

RecommendsComment from 31 Dec 2025 in “OpenAI's cash burn will be one of the big bubble questions of 2026”

“that was a good major point release to make then”

RecommendsComment from 20 Dec 2025 in “LLM Year in Review”

“Last year o3 high did 88% on ARC-AGI 1 at more than $4,000/task.”

MixedComment from 11 Dec 2025 in “GPT-5.2”

“Both ChatGPT o3 and 5.1 Pro models helped me a lot diagnosing illnesses with the right queries.”

RecommendsComment from 9 Dec 2025 in “I misused LLMs to diagnose myself and ended up bedridden for a week”

“o3 and “reasoning with tools” for a massive consumer audience was a major advance”

RecommendsComment from 3 Dec 2025 in “OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race”

“Since O3, which is the first one that really started to understand Rust's borrow checker in my experience.”

RecommendsComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3”

“o3 pro is very slow and expensive”

MixedComment from 21 Nov 2025 in “Kagi Assistants”

“The amount of times ChatGPT o3 helped me with medical issues makes me think that it already saved much more lives.”

RecommendsComment from 15 Nov 2025 in “Llmdeathcount.com”

“o3 and gpt5t are great models, super smart and helpful for many things”

MixedComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT”

“o3 is getting it no problem, first try, a simple and reasonable answer”

RecommendsComment from 13 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT”

“thankfully that model is still in the switcher”

RecommendsComment from 12 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT”

“o3 is a much better model for me than GPT5 on any setting”

RecommendsComment from 5 Nov 2025 on Hacker News

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.