OpenAI o3
Hacker ApprovedThe most recommended of 4 reasoning models
People recommend o3 for analytical, medical and coding questions, where it gave fewer wrong or nonsensical answers. The common caveat is that o3 Pro is slow and expensive.
People recommend o3 for analytical, medical and coding questions, where it gave fewer wrong or nonsensical answers. The common caveat is that o3 Pro is slow and expensive.
50 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 37
- criticize it
- 13
- approval share
- 74%
Recommended in 11 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 37 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.8 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Strong at identifying places from images
“5.5 is significantly worse than o3 at geo-guessing”
Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work” “O3 has been excellent at identifying unknown finds”
Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work” “also give the correct answer (without web search)”
Comment from 7 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models” - Comment from 6 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”
- Comment from 7 Jul 2026 in “A global workspace in language models”
Detailed, thorough answers on first try
“80% of the thoroughness with 20% of the time, which tended to be better overall”
Comment from 25 Feb 2026 in “Mercury 2: The fastest reasoning LLM, powered by diffusion” “o3 is getting it no problem, first try, a simple and reasonable answer”
Comment from 13 Nov 2025 in “GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT” “after 15 minutes it returned with the answer that had taken me hours”
Comment from 7 Jun 2026 in “What was your "Oh Shit" moment with GenAI?” - Comment from 1 Mar 2026 in “Switch to Claude Without Starting Over”
Strong at coding and Rust
“Since O3, which is the first one that really started to understand Rust's borrow checker in my experience.”
Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3” “Its the secret sauce behind why the current models are so great at coding”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Rich Sutton on AI creativity and discovery” “o3 was the best at the programming tasks I do”
Comment from 18 Feb 2026 in “Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on employment or productivity” Fewer wrong or nonsensical answers
“It gives me fewer flat-out wrong or nonsensical responses.”
Comment from 14 Jan 2026 on Hacker News “o3 did a notably better job at a lot of analytical prompts”
Comment from 29 Jan 2026 in “Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT” “o3 is a much better model for me than GPT5 on any setting”
Comment from 5 Nov 2025 on Hacker News
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Slow and expensive to run
“o3 pro is very slow and expensive”
Comment from 21 Nov 2025 in “Kagi Assistants” “o3 actually costs $350 per hour (more than the human price) to achieve tasks at its full 1.5 hour task horizon.”
Comment from 18 Apr 2026 in “Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? (2025)” “That's orders of magnitude cheaper than OpenAI o3 and qualitatively in a different league.”
Comment from 31 Jan 2026 in “I Build a Open Source Deep Research Engine Wich Beats Google and Open AI” - Comment from 18 Apr 2026 in “Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? (2025)”
Overhyped claims about its abilities
“the meta around AI is not rigorous reporting on the nuance of capabilities but bold claims that are easy to retweet”
Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work” “I remember reading breathless threads about how o3 was going to single-handedly end white collar work”
Comment from 1 Sep 2026 in “How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?” “showed they were not that good at it.”
Comment from 27 May 2026 in “GPT 5.5 aces 20x20 multiplication that o3 couldn't handle” Overreaches and misreports its methods
“then when it responded claimed to recognize the visuals of the mountain”
Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work” “o3 was cheating — it pulled location data, then lied about it.”
Comment from 21 May 2026 in “The famous O3 "GeoGuessr" prompt did not work”
Other reasoning models people recommend
The three most recommended other reasoning models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI o3This page | 37 | 13 | 74% | 11 | — | Approved |
| VibeThinker 3B | 28 | 10 | 74% | 4 | — | Approved |
| DeepSeek R1 | 25 | 15 | 63% | 10 | — | — |
| OpenAI o1 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 7 | — | — |
What people said
40 of the 57 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“three big jumps in LLM capability: o3, opus 4.6, and opus 5.5”
“o3 is a black hole you can talk to, and it only gave information back if there was something to give back”
“I remember reading breathless threads about how o3 was going to single-handedly end white collar work”
“also give the correct answer (without web search)”
“OpenAI's o3, o1 and 4.1 get it right first try”
“they all found it instantly with search disabled”
“Its the secret sauce behind why the current models are so great at coding”
“after 15 minutes it returned with the answer that had taken me hours”
“showed they were not that good at it.”
“O3 has been excellent at identifying unknown finds”
“then when it responded claimed to recognize the visuals of the mountain”
“o3 was cheating — it pulled location data, then lied about it.”
“5.5 is significantly worse than o3 at geo-guessing”
“the meta around AI is not rigorous reporting on the nuance of capabilities but bold claims that are easy to retweet”
“Exactly the same argument was made about o3-preview, lol.”
“that's when it might be worth paying for o3/Claude Opus class models”
“surpassed by o3 at over $100/hr”
“o3 actually costs $350 per hour (more than the human price) to achieve tasks at its full 1.5 hour task horizon.”
“for non-coding prompts I still far prefer o3 even if it's considered a legacy model”
“if you use older models (5.1 instant or o3) you get a ton of detail”
“80% of the thoroughness with 20% of the time, which tended to be better overall”
“o3 was the best at the programming tasks I do”
“That's orders of magnitude cheaper than OpenAI o3 and qualitatively in a different league.”
“it's full of bugs, showing JSON all the time while thinking”
“o3 did a notably better job at a lot of analytical prompts”
“around the time of o1/o3/Gemini 2.5 was when things changed and I haven't looked back since”
“It gives me fewer flat-out wrong or nonsensical responses.”
“an astonishing model punching far above the weights (ahem) of models that came after”
“for me, o3 was the first sign of true "intelligence"”
“that was a good major point release to make then”
“Last year o3 high did 88% on ARC-AGI 1 at more than $4,000/task.”
“Both ChatGPT o3 and 5.1 Pro models helped me a lot diagnosing illnesses with the right queries.”
“o3 and “reasoning with tools” for a massive consumer audience was a major advance”
“Since O3, which is the first one that really started to understand Rust's borrow checker in my experience.”
“o3 pro is very slow and expensive”
“The amount of times ChatGPT o3 helped me with medical issues makes me think that it already saved much more lives.”
“o3 and gpt5t are great models, super smart and helpful for many things”
“o3 is getting it no problem, first try, a simple and reasonable answer”
“thankfully that model is still in the switcher”
“o3 is a much better model for me than GPT5 on any setting”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.