Nvidia DLSS 5

“they provide a far superior way of native AA”

“This sounds like a legit use case for DLSS 5.”

“It's really good at making older gen games look remade/remastered.”

“its really good, but it does have its _requirements_ which you can avoid”

“I like neural rendering ideas in the sense DLSS can make certain things happen on older machines”

“It's an excellent option to have, especially with older titles”

“this one is perhaps a bit over-the-top though”

“DLSS 4 Balanced looks excellent and renders at less than 720p for 1080p output.”

“DLSS can greatly reduce the bandwidth requirements for 4K gaming.”

“if you look at the improved quality of upscalers (DLLS 4.5 for example), gaming is now more affordable than ever”

“it makes sense to me that it would increase compute demand instead of reduce it”

“almost all new games support it and despite the widespread complaints, very few people actually disable these features.”

“directionally interesting but executed poorly”

“I question the feasibility of fixing the issues while running the model on a consumer GPU in realtime”

“For me, still find it impressive, and think the level detail in the faces and clothing is a full step up in capability.”

“there's nothing intrinsically expensive about DLSS to cause such a latency”

“Look at how it completely deletes the shadow of the steeple on the right hand side”

“they look more realistic than with dlss 5 turned off”

“it absolutely blasts contrast and crushes shadows to reduce dynamic range”

“I imagine in the future devs wont bother creating detailed faces anymore”

“This prnified AI filter "touch-up" is not the upgrade you AI evangelists think it is.”

“I get 2x perf without visual degradation or any notable latency at all”

“DLSS 5 clearly improves the graphics most of the time.”

“They are literally upgrading graphics by a generation with software.”

“how are they going to keep the randomly generated sexy new AI face for the characters consistent between shots?”

“it looks bad and uses an unreasonable amount of resources to do its thing”

“Artificially changing graphics to make them 'look better' is similar to my feelings”

“Seems like an easy win, use it or dont use it.”

“It is really tragic because DLSS has been pretty great so far.”

“I don't like the Netflix CGI slop movie style filter look it gives everything”

“For faces, skin, and hair (so everything human) I personally dislike the direction.”

“which magically doubles perf while maintaining visual quality”

“Not sure why anyone would want this, either on the consumer or producer side.”

“As it stands, it's horrible and the reaction has been rightly negative.”

“I was particularly impressed by the Starfield footage, I like the more realistic look.”

“It will, and everyone's pipelines will end up adjusted and optimized to having this stuff bolted on the end of the rendering.”

“it completely upends and ruins the dynamic lighting that the developers spend a huge amount of time perfecting”

“They all have unfitting high contrast lighting that doesn't match the environment”

“If RTX and DLSS are accomplishing that, who cares how it is done?”

“The existence of Nvidia DLSS (upscaling and frame generation) alone is a huge advantage over the Steam Deck”