NoScript

“you can disable extensions and run noscript. that should take care of most attack vectors that people roll.”

“I've found NoScript actually very usable, as long as you allow yourself to be fairly liberal in marking domains”

“I've found NoScript actually very usable, as long as you allow yourself to be fairly liberal in marking domains "trusted."”

“This cuts down on the volume of garbage sites I waste time on and shields me from novel trackers not on any block list.”

“NoScript works well enough just wholesale blocking js”

“NoScript and uMatrix were a great help - for very advanced users.”

“The NoScript extension was at the forefront, providing a lot of functionality way beyond just blocking JavaScript per domain.”

“Whitelisting per-domain and per-site what can run Javascript does more for my privacy than anything else”

“always a good idea to use NoScript too for more fine grained control”

“Literally nothing works through NoScript any more since all the bootcamps started teaching React.”

“You really need NoScript and LocalCDN in the arsenal to pare back the invasive abuse of privacy.”

“NoScript, no problem. Of course then you have to deal with NoScript, but it has so many other uses you'll be sorting your whitelist anyways.”

“allows me to toggle off javascript and vanquish most pop ups and nag screens”

“that's a big pain for an average person”

“NoScript allows most of the modern web to work with selective whitelisting.”

“pretty much nothing loaded since like 99.9% of the web uses js for basic functionality.”

“you should at least be using a JavaScript blocker/whitelister such as NoScript”

“I find NoScript's UI more convenient for script toggling”

“not after I began using pihole, NoScript, and UBlock Origin”

“Adding an extension that can access all your browsing data doesn't seem very secure either.”

“Use uBlock and block javascript by default with NoScript.”

“we can achieve security through extensions like noscript or ublock origin or firefox containers”

“Noscript breaks 99% of websites these days, entirely.”

“you need to run NoScript to block all javascript if you want to be remotely secure on the web”

“Keeping it disabled, at least by default, is the best thing you can do to protect yourself.”

“Browsing and not using these tools nowadays is volunteering for a bad time, IMO.”

“This is why I put up with NoScript, it's frustrating sometimes to determine what a site actually needs to function”

“blocking scripts actually breaks too much to be a good, general workaround against web pages being too heavy”

“run uBlock Origin and NoScript and you probably won't need it”

“I'd given up on that a while ago because I basically had to disable it everywhere”

“I tried NoScript, but it breaks way too many sites.”

“Run NoScript and cut out all the data broker bloat, allowing just a limited number of critical scripts to run.”

“I still block Javascript everywhere just so that things will actually work and won't crash my browser”

“uBlock Origin and NoScript can block almost all these annoyances”

“NoScript mostly solves this, except for sites that open up with the pop-ups already visible and require JavaScript to be enabled”

“Give it just enough capability to run uBlock Origin and NoScript.”

“especially uBlock Origin (UBO), Ghostery, No script, etc.”

“I don't want to have to allow the minimum for each site”

“keeps JS off by default and allows me to selectively enable scripts by domain”

“merely uBlock use renders me unique, whereas one in 5742.77 had the same fingerprint as me when using NoScript”