Hacker ApprovedDepartments

NilAway by Uber

Shares rank 8 of 12 static analyzers by recommenders

Gives feedback right away on nil-related issues, though it does not force you to document the intent behind parameters and fields.

Gives feedback right away on nil-related issues, though it does not force you to document the intent behind parameters and fields.

6 people gave an opinion

recommend it
6
criticize it
0
approval share
100%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 5 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 6 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Gives feedback right away

    “That makes nilaway a decent tool to get feedback right away, but it doesn't force you to document the intention behind parameters and fields”

    Comment from 21 Jun 2026 in “Excessive nil pointer checks in Go”
  • Used at work by a team

    “At work we use Uber’s NillAway, so that helps bit.”

    Comment from 14 Nov 2025 in “Go's Sweet 16”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Does not force documenting parameter intent

    “That makes nilaway a decent tool to get feedback right away, but it doesn't force you to document the intention behind parameters and fields”

    Comment from 21 Jun 2026 in “Excessive nil pointer checks in Go”

Other static analyzers people recommend

The four most recommended other static analyzers, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

NilAway by Uber compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
zizmor19195%6—Approved
Semgrep141058%7——
clang-tidy14478%6—Approved
PHPStan110100%7—Approved
NilAway by UberThis page60100%5——
See all 12 static analyzers, ranked

What people said

3 of the 6 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“This does exist, actually.”

RecommendsComment from 21 Jun 2026 in “Excessive nil pointer checks in Go”

“That makes nilaway a decent tool to get feedback right away, but it doesn't force you to document the intention behind parameters and fields”

MixedComment from 21 Jun 2026 in “Excessive nil pointer checks in Go”

“At work we use Uber’s NillAway, so that helps bit.”

MixedComment from 14 Nov 2025 in “Go's Sweet 16”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.