Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Mistral Medium 3.5

Shares rank 32 of 72 language models by recommenders

Fast, cheap, and good enough for many everyday coding and writing tasks; the common caveat is that it trails newer models.

Fast, cheap, and good enough for many everyday coding and writing tasks; the common caveat is that it trails newer models.

54 people gave an opinion

recommend it
26
criticize it
28
approval share
48%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 8 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 26 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 0.9 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 8 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Good enough for many tasks

    “Mistral's medium is absolutely good enough to help with a ton of coding tasks.”

    Comment from 4 Oct 2026 in “Kolibri: A Sovereign Open-Weight Model”

    “within a few percent of SOTA that might be good enough for a lot of people”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “lower sized models, lower costs, overall good enough performance”

    Comment from 30 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”
  • Cheap, low-cost pricing

    “and Mistral Medium down to some Qwen 3.6 35B for effectively peanuts compared to Anthropic.”

    Comment from 26 Jun 2026 in “US Govt to individually approve who gets GPT 5.6”

    “most aggressive open-weight pricing I've seen anywhere near frontier capability”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “lower sized models, lower costs, overall good enough performance”

    Comment from 30 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”
  • Open weight, self-hostable

    “it's open weight and is tiny compared to a lot of it's competitors”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “This model is a very good option for enterprise self host.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”
  • Better than earlier Mistral models

    “The new Mistral Medium 3.5 is also a big improvement over devstral-2”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Leanstral 1.5”

    “It's giving me better results than mistral-large for my use cases.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Trails newer open models

    “Unfortunately they only compare to old “all other open models”. There are probably over 10 other open models better than it by now.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “the fact the Gemma 4 26B A4B I'm running locally can blow it out of the water doesn't give me high confidence for the model”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “When I try other html / js prompts it also lacks behind china models from over half a year ago.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”
  • Feels dated for current standards

    “considering the model is getting a bit old, I wouldn't expect them to keep offering it forever”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “Mistral large 3/medium 3.5/small 4 have all been pretty dated for a while”

    Comment from 30 Oct 2026 in “We're releasing the weights of Mistral Large 4”

    “twice the European counterpart (albeit dated for today's standards?)”

    Comment from 17 Jul 2026 in “Kimi K3 is now live”
  • Priced high for its performance

    “This particular Mistral Medium looks to be uncompetitive at that pricing.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “new Medium 3.5 is far more expensive than previous Mistral models”

    Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit in Paris”
  • Benchmark results questioned

    “It's SWE-Bench Verified. A benchmark Open-AI stopped using two months ago due to contamination.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

    “Not really. The benchmarks are based on F8_E4M3 and you’re not running that on any Mac.”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

Other language models people recommend

The four most recommended other language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Mistral Medium 3.5 compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Claude Opus3,3312,74655%134 mo156 owners—
OpenAI GPT1,20598755%136 mo47 owners—
Claude Sonnet85458659%136 mo46 owners—
DeepSeek V4 Flash82822379%81 mo24 ownersApproved
Mistral Medium 3.5This page262848%8——
See all 72 language models, ranked

What people said

40 of the 64 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Mistral large 3/medium 3.5/small 4 have all been pretty dated for a while”

CriticizesComment from 30 Oct 2026 in “We're releasing the weights of Mistral Large 4”

“Mistral's medium is absolutely good enough to help with a ton of coding tasks.”

RecommendsComment from 4 Oct 2026 in “Kolibri: A Sovereign Open-Weight Model”

“their Mistral Medium 3.5 with reasoning is worse than Gemma 4 31B and Glimmer 30B”

CriticizesComment from 8 Sep 2026 in “Mistral raises €3B”

“asking Mistral medium to rewrite all of”

MixedComment from 20 Aug 2026 in “Clean up Claude 5's token vomit with a separate LLM”

“The only solution I’ve found that works is asking Mistral medium to rewrite all of Claude’s documentation”

RecommendsComment from 20 Aug 2026 in “Clean up Claude 5's token vomit with a separate LLM”

“twice the European counterpart (albeit dated for today's standards?)”

MixedComment from 17 Jul 2026 in “Kimi K3 is now live”

“The new Mistral Medium 3.5 is also a big improvement over devstral-2”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Leanstral 1.5”

“considerably better at writing than Opus”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Leanstral 1.5”

“and Mistral Medium down to some Qwen 3.6 35B for effectively peanuts compared to Anthropic.”

RecommendsComment from 26 Jun 2026 in “US Govt to individually approve who gets GPT 5.6”

“Mistral Medium 3.5 being significantly better at real-time decision making than they are at coding”

RecommendsComment from 17 Jun 2026 in “A Robot Is Sprinting Towards You: Do You Want It Running on Claude or Grok?”

“perfectly fine if you're willing to talk to it in a more fine-grained way about actual code”

RecommendsComment from 30 May 2026 in “Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit in Paris”

“new Medium 3.5 is far more expensive than previous Mistral models”

CriticizesComment from 29 May 2026 in “Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit in Paris”

“It will probably be enough for plenty of tasks, though there's also a noticeable difference between that and up to 1M.”

MixedComment from 22 May 2026 in “Microsoft Drops Claude Code After Budget Overrun”

“lower sized models, lower costs, overall good enough performance”

RecommendsComment from 30 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Being near the Pareto frontier of inference cost vs. output quality.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“But what is the rationale for running a dumb model? Because it can ocasionally produce something passable?”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“This is going to be much slower.”

MixedComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“considering the model is getting a bit old, I wouldn't expect them to keep offering it forever”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“releasing a model today that's only on par with open-source dense models a quarter of the size is kind of a flop”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Not really. The benchmarks are based on F8_E4M3 and you’re not running that on any Mac.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“it's working great for my usual test prompts”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“For it's size, that's really good!”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Mistral continuing to ship credible models is good for the market.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“When I try other html / js prompts it also lacks behind china models from over half a year ago.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“there is a significant difference between Mistral and Kimi or Gemini”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Not sure it will beat Sonet at Q4.”

MixedComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“it's open weight and is tiny compared to a lot of it's competitors”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Given what Vibe already did in the previous versions with codestral-v2, that's great news.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“the fact the Gemma 4 26B A4B I'm running locally can blow it out of the water doesn't give me high confidence for the model”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“This model is a very good option for enterprise self host.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“It's giving me better results than mistral-large for my use cases.”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“most aggressive open-weight pricing I've seen anywhere near frontier capability”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“This beats the latest Sonnet while running locally”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“This particular Mistral Medium looks to be uncompetitive at that pricing.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“Unfortunately they only compare to old “all other open models”. There are probably over 10 other open models better than it by now.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“model and national diversity is great. This looks like a solid foundation to build on”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“within a few percent of SOTA that might be good enough for a lot of people”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“It's SWE-Bench Verified. A benchmark Open-AI stopped using two months ago due to contamination.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Mistral Medium 3.5”

“I use mistral-medium-3.1 for a lot of random daily tasks”

RecommendsComment from 16 Mar 2026 in “Mistral Releases Leanstral”

“It's been insanely fast, cheap, reliable, and follows formatting instructions to the letter.”

RecommendsComment from 2 Dec 2025 in “Mistral 3 family of models released”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.