LWN.net subscription

“a site with a 1999 html style like LWN”

“the LWN website's look and feel (and the reasoning behind it) perfectly illustrates why this project is doomed”

“LWN doesn't even come close to compete in the value that provides to me”

“They truly put an outstanding effort into their articles.”

“Since having my HN account I always read LWN articles shared here, but this has convinced me to finally subscribe”

“Kudos to them for their longevity, integrity, high quality journalism”

“If you enjoy well-written technical content, please subscribe and support them.”

“Very happy 10+ years subscribed here and I'll keep subscribing.”

“They've also done good coverage of CPython development”

“LWN is one of the services I keep subscribing to”

“Their pricing is at US levels not world levels.”

“I highly recommend subscribing if you can. It's really one of the great ones”

“I just can't think of anything else that comes close in terms of quality of information.”

“If the price is too high, many users maybe think it is not worthy of the price”

“This is the single biggest feature that makes me keep my subscription going.”

“if you're getting value from it, you should be interested in its continued existence and therefore subscribe”

“the quality (both of the technical content and the lack of advertising/sensationalism/clickbait) when I do read an article”

“what they do is extremely important and hard to do”

“given that they have been a cornerstone of your very successful career”

“They've always respected their readers and I hope that continues to pay off.”

“just the weekly exposure to absolutely top notch technical writing was foundational to me.”

“the week-long delay isn't nearly enough an incentive to actually subscribe”

“I certainly hope they figure that out or how to get new ways to earn revenue without having to go the ad route.”

“It's easily the most worthwhile subscription I currently have.”

“The prices you ask are well worth it for the incredible value that LWN provides.”

“one of the, if not the single, highest signal tech publications around”

“those were very helpful backgrounds on the situation in Fedora”

“LWN tends to be the best bet for these things, but you have to follow their reporting long term”

“For a more general changelog I’d recommend the LWN articles”

“All HN readers should, obviously, subscribe to LWN.”

“Fantastic and anti-sensationalism write-up from LWN, as usual.”

“insistent begging to the point of inserting additional obstacles = angry/insulted users that are less likely to pay”

“is a goldmine of great contents about Linux kernel”

“fully human-written, LWN posts it every development cycle”

“dark mode has pitch-black background with bold 100% white glowing text in foreground, shitty font, way to wide text”

“lwn.net does that well, highlighting unread comments as a perk for higher-tier subscribers”

“you might like to come look at the website directly and see some of the wider content mix that we work on”

“LWN.net has a form of this, where a subscriber can share a "guest" link for a subscriber-only article”

“LWN is a second-to-none publication that on this rare occasion couldn't resist the joke”

“I sometimes use lwn.net as an exemplary showcase of things non-tech journalists should learn”