Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Login.gov

Ranked 6 of 7 digital IDs by recommenders

People recommend it as a government sign-in option that is more secure than alternatives like ID.me, especially for federal services, with in-person ID checks cited as a strength.

People recommend it as a government sign-in option that is more secure than alternatives like ID.me, especially for federal services, with in-person ID checks cited as a strength.

13 people gave an opinion

recommend it
8
criticize it
5
approval share
62%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 2 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 8 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 1.6 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 2 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Seen as more secure than alternatives

    “physically going to a federally owned building with cameras and providing ID has got to be one of the more secure ways to handle it”

    Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

    “When given the option (like this case), I recommend Login.gov over ID.me.”

    Comment from 22 Jun 2026 in “Never Give Them Your Face”

    “it is good enough (based on all available evidence)”

    Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”
  • Good enough for large user base

    “if its good enough for ~342M Americans, its good enough for our customer base”

    Comment from 1 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

    “cover everyone 18+ in the US eventually”

    Comment from 3 Aug 2026 in “New York Will Require Digital ID Checks for Social Feeds”
  • Wanted for federal service logins

    “Under the prior administration things were moving slowly toward login.gov for every federal service.”

    Comment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

    “Why on earth are they not using login.gov”

    Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

    “Unfortunate it's not login.gov”

    Comment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

Other digital IDs people recommend

The four most recommended other digital IDs, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Login.gov compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
BankID252847%9——
EU Digital Identity Wallet132039%8——
DigiD11955%7——
MitID112134%4——
Login.govThis page8562%2——
See all 7 digital IDs, ranked

What people said

15 of the 16 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“the federal government is backpedaling on login.gov”

CriticizesComment from 2 Sep 2026 in “FBI Probes Service Selling 153M+ Drivers Licenses”

“Really neither is a good solution.”

CriticizesComment from 17 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“Why on earth are they not using login.gov”

RecommendsComment from 17 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“Under the prior administration things were moving slowly toward login.gov for every federal service.”

RecommendsComment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“And we even have login.gov, too!”

RecommendsComment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“Login.gov has some technical gaps for agency customer identity use cases”

CriticizesComment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“Unfortunate it's not login.gov”

RecommendsComment from 15 Aug 2026 in “TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In”

“cover everyone 18+ in the US eventually”

RecommendsComment from 3 Aug 2026 in “New York Will Require Digital ID Checks for Social Feeds”

“When given the option (like this case), I recommend Login.gov over ID.me.”

RecommendsComment from 22 Jun 2026 in “Never Give Them Your Face”

“it is good enough (based on all available evidence)”

RecommendsComment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

“Turn over access to all your personal accounts to the US government? Sure. What could possibly go wrong.”

CriticizesComment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

“It would be a very useful service for them to provide a "User forgot password and can't log in" flow”

RecommendsComment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

“physically going to a federally owned building with cameras and providing ID has got to be one of the more secure ways to handle it”

RecommendsComment from 2 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

“my experience was … negative to the point of actively avoiding it”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

“if its good enough for ~342M Americans, its good enough for our customer base”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jun 2026 in “The newest Instagram "exploit" is the goofiest I've seen”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.