Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Poolside Laguna XS.2

Hacker Approved

Ranked 29 of 39 open-weight language models by recommenders

Recommended for fast local use on CPU and for web research; critics say it trails rivals on benchmarks and is broken in places.

Recommended for fast local use on CPU and for web research; critics say it trails rivals on benchmarks and is broken in places.

15 people gave an opinion

recommend it
12
criticize it
3
approval share
80%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 6 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 12 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 4 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 6 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Fast and good on CPU

    “really fast on CPU and very good”

    Comment from 27 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Running local LLMs? What's your model and hardware”

    “it's very good on cpu only”

    Comment from 11 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: What's the best LLM model that on a 24 GB VRAM GPU?”
  • Agent harness works well

    “theyre shipping the actual agent harness alongside the weights is the part that matters”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

    “It's fast, and the agent adheres to the ACP spec pretty well”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”
  • Competitive on coding benchmarks

    “very nice to see it materialized into something competitive”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

    “reasonably competitive on coding related benchmarks”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Trails rivals on benchmarks

    “not looking very good on the slightly-less-benchmaxxed Terminal-Bench 2.0”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

    “Not sure if this is competitive, look at the numbers for Qwen3.6”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

Other open-weight language models people recommend

The four most recommended other open-weight language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Poolside Laguna XS.2 compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Qwen 3.8 27B1,17342673%132 mo32 ownersApproved
Z.ai GLM1,04338473%132 mo52 ownersApproved
Kimi93135972%131 mo26 ownersApproved
Gemma 471324974%131 mo14 ownersApproved
Poolside Laguna XS.2This page12380%6—Approved
See all 39 open-weight language models, ranked

What people said

16 of the 19 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“I don't use it as much as Poolside's (excellent!!) Laguna XS 2.1 6bit”

RecommendsComment from 10 Oct 2026 in “Nvidia in talks to acquire US 'open' model startup Reflection AI”

“That is fast and almost as good.”

RecommendsComment from 6 Oct 2026 in “Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s”

“Laguna drew random scribbles but the rest all managed to produce something monkey-like.”

MixedComment from 12 Aug 2026 in “Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 lightning and Nemo Switchyard”

“It was able to run locally with a context of 128k using llama-cpp and I tried using it for local development”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jul 2026 in “Laguna S 2.1”

“without thinking enabled it is shockingly good at researching using web tool calls”

MixedComment from 25 Jul 2026 in “Laguna S 2.1”

“reasonably competitive on coding related benchmarks”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development”

“Oh! Looks like I’ve been sleeping on Laguna!”

RecommendsComment from 27 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Running local LLMs? What's your model and hardware”

“really fast on CPU and very good”

RecommendsComment from 27 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Running local LLMs? What's your model and hardware”

“it's very good on cpu only”

RecommendsComment from 11 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: What's the best LLM model that on a 24 GB VRAM GPU?”

“It's broken, but it's very aesthetic”

MixedComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“neither are particularly great”

CriticizesComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“theyre shipping the actual agent harness alongside the weights is the part that matters”

RecommendsComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“Not sure if this is competitive, look at the numbers for Qwen3.6”

CriticizesComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“not looking very good on the slightly-less-benchmaxxed Terminal-Bench 2.0”

CriticizesComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“very nice to see it materialized into something competitive”

RecommendsComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

“It's fast, and the agent adheres to the ACP spec pretty well”

RecommendsComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Laguna XS.2 and M.1”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.