IPFS
Peer-to-peer storage in Hosting & cloud
Recommended for content-addressed, censorship-resistant file distribution that stays available when the original server is down. Main caveat: poor maintenance and funding, with little use for business-critical storage.
Recommended for content-addressed, censorship-resistant file distribution that stays available when the original server is down. Main caveat: poor maintenance and funding, with little use for business-critical storage.
113 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 48
- criticize it
- 65
- approval share
- 42%
Recommended in 11 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 5 years
Median of the 3 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 48 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 0.7 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Content-addressed, verifiable file storage
“Content-addressable decentralized storage -- not tied to a cryptocurrency -- is really valuable for censorship-resistant archiving”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “content addressed storage with cryptographic (not in a crypo coin way) names makes a lot of sense”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “What makes systems like content-addressed storage (e.g., IPFS/IPLD) powerful”
Comment from 4 Feb 2026 in “Show HN: Octosphere, a tool to decentralise scientific publishing” - Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “How We Made IPFS Content Publishing 10x Faster”
Decentralized alternative to HTTP hosting
“tracker/ad/algorithm free static site on the status quo of http, or something newer like IPFS, is worlds better”
Comment from 23 Apr 2026 in “Using the internet like it's 1999” “That feels more distributed than the sorts of HTTP servers mentioned in TFA.”
Comment from 18 Jun 2026 in “The Forge We Deserve” “IPFS is a much better fit for the purpose when you dig into the details”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” - Comment from 30 Aug 2026 in “Creepy Crawlies”
Censorship resistant without a central server
“Content-addressable decentralized storage -- not tied to a cryptocurrency -- is really valuable for censorship-resistant archiving”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “Censorship resistant in the same sense that bittorrent is, with no single centralized server or domain registration to target.”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” Files stay available if origin fails
“That way others can download them and keep them available even if your server is down”
Comment from 23 Aug 2026 in “How to archive Everything and share It” “It's just static content, so it has sense to be distributed between nodes.”
Comment from 5 Jan 2026 in “Anna's Archive Loses .Org Domain After Surprise Suspension”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Hard to sustain without funding
“Being economically non-viable without grants is one way that anti-censorship technology is ineffective at its stated goal.”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “I like IPFS but decentralized storage is just awfully expensive to maintain without any reward.”
Comment from 5 Jan 2026 in “Anna's Archive Loses .Org Domain After Surprise Suspension” Poor maintenance and unclear ownership
“IPFS could do it but IPFS has been very very poorly maintained.”
Comment from 30 Oct 2026 in “Polymarket 1h halt after vendor compromise; affected users will be 'made whole'” “A grant to an individual maintainer is not the same as a named owner with commit rights and a release process.”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “I'm not sure where IPFS went wrong, but I think our web will continue to degrade until we figure it out.”
Comment from 30 Aug 2026 in “Creepy Crawlies” Slow and unreliable downloads
“IPFS in my limited experience is slow but reliable.”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “I'm building a parallel internet, and it's called The Thinnernet” “It was also pretty slow (download rate wise), even if the destination and source node had a good link between them.”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “I clicked an IPFS link years ago, it loaded for a long time and never actually loaded anything”
Comment from 11 Dec 2025 in “Auto-grading decade-old Hacker News discussions with hindsight” Has not displaced cloud storage
“nobody uses IPFS for anything business critical since it's not all that great at doing things that you need from file storage systems”
Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “IPFS Maintainers Winding Down” “sounds a lot like things like IPFS, which have also completely failed to displace either cloud storage or buying a bunch of disks”
Comment from 8 Oct 2026 in “Why isn't the industry freaking out about DeepSeek 4.1 Flash?”
What people recommend instead
The same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPFSThis page | 48 | 65 | 42% | 11 | 5 yrs3 owners | — |
| Arweave | 9 | 1 | 90% | 7 | — | — |
What people said
40 of the 130 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“IPFS is or is something like one piece of that picture but there are other essential pieces to complete that picture.”
“IPFS could do it but IPFS has been very very poorly maintained.”
“sounds a lot like things like IPFS, which have also completely failed to displace either cloud storage or buying a bunch of disks”
“adopting something that is forward compatible at the ecosystem/community level like ipfs makes sense to me”
“I'm not sure where IPFS went wrong, but I think our web will continue to degrade until we figure it out.”
“IPFS implements building blocks for such an alternative web.”
“Probably the best use case for onion routing and IPFS.”
“host some version of an Encarta/encyclopedia that would be so distributed it would probably survive world wide catastrophe”
“Censorship resistant in the same sense that bittorrent is, with no single centralized server or domain registration to target.”
“It was also pretty slow (download rate wise), even if the destination and source node had a good link between them.”
“IPFS is a much better fit for the purpose when you dig into the details”
“Some achingly beautiful design, willingness to completely disregard existing messy conventions”
“A grant to an individual maintainer is not the same as a named owner with commit rights and a release process.”
“Saving bandwidth for the website operators and distributing storage of content”
“the foundation of it had limits that were extremely hard to work past”
“nobody uses IPFS for anything business critical since it's not all that great at doing things that you need from file storage systems”
“content addressed storage with cryptographic (not in a crypo coin way) names makes a lot of sense”
“Being economically non-viable without grants is one way that anti-censorship technology is ineffective at its stated goal.”
“Content-addressable decentralized storage -- not tied to a cryptocurrency -- is really valuable for censorship-resistant archiving”
“how it could be seen with relative ease on the standard internet”
“That way others can download them and keep them available even if your server is down”
“every version of the code is immutable and impossible to delete”
“IPFS solves this issue by just hashing the contents of the file.”
“IPFS would be much better for something like LFS support than git repos itself”
“That feels more distributed than the sorts of HTTP servers mentioned in TFA.”
“IPFS in my limited experience is slow but reliable.”
“more like you want better decentralization, like IPFS or BitTorrent”
“tracker/ad/algorithm free static site on the status quo of http, or something newer like IPFS, is worlds better”
“I guess I'd rather have something approaching bittorrent, edonkey/kad, ipfs, blockchain, webarchives.”
“They should serve them all via IPFS if they haven't done it already”
“What makes systems like content-addressed storage (e.g., IPFS/IPLD) powerful”
“The shadow libraries Anna's Archive and Library Genesis host books via IPFS.”
“IPFS support interface binding, hard disk quotas, working as a router or not, and bandwidth quotas among several settings.”
“I like IPFS but decentralized storage is just awfully expensive to maintain without any reward.”
“It's just static content, so it has sense to be distributed between nodes.”
“IPFS or even GitHub should do, no crypto payments required.”
“I clicked an IPFS link years ago, it loaded for a long time and never actually loaded anything”
“host your website on a decentralized network like Bluesky or IPFS for free”
“P2P and federation tech is really cool stuff! I feel like ipfs is what most non-tech people thought the cloud was, perhaps even what it should've been.”
“get content-addressable networking—IPFS, a better iteration of IPFS, your favourite alternative to IPFS”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.