Thinking Machines Inkling
Hacker ApprovedRanked 18 of 39 open-weight language models by recommenders
Thinking Machines' open-weights model, praised as a strong American debut and for its fast, pleasant tone, but critics say it trails rivals on benchmarks.
Thinking Machines' open-weights model, praised as a strong American debut and for its fast, pleasant tone, but critics say it trails rivals on benchmarks.
55 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 42
- criticize it
- 13
- approval share
- 76%
Recommended in 4 of 13 months
- November 2025: not recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 42 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 3.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Competitive American open-weights model
“For a first model, and given it's open, I am gaining some faith in American Open research labs again...”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “Very impressive model, exciting to see an American open-source lab with such competitive results.”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “Inkling is the most exciting model launch we've seen from an American lab in a while”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “We've adding Inkling and 52 small apps one-shotted by it to our arena.” - Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
- Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
- Comment from 27 Jul 2026 in “Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]”
- Comment from 8 Aug 2026 in “U.S. Department of Energy Launches the Genesis Open Models Initiative”
- Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
Strong debut for a first release
“releasing a decent open weights model in 16 months is actually quite comparable”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “This seems like a really really great debut model for a new lab”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “This seems like an extremely strong model for a first release”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” - Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
Fast, pleasant tone and personality
“seems pretty dang snappy and I like it's tone/personality so far”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “it is SUPER FAST and does a good job at being a terminal buddy”
Comment from 22 Jul 2026 in “Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA” “This is the best voice/tone I've seen from any model so far.”
Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” Accurate on niche details and knowledge
“I enjoyed turning off web search for Inkling to experiment with what innate knowledge is encoded in the model weights.”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “Inkling, e.g. is more accurate in not telling you to adjust valves that are simply not adjustable”
Comment from 14 Aug 2026 in “Qwen3.8-27B” “accurately answered a number of questions focused on very niche details”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Trails rivals on benchmarks
“It looks promising, but on my cases it still fell short of GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.6 Luna.”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “it debuts at #41 on the AA index and the post itself calls it not the strongest overall”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” “artificial analysis puts it quite low below previous gen open weights models from China”
Comment from 16 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model” - Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
- Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
- Comment from 15 Jul 2026 in “Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model”
Only decent, not great
“their Inkling model was decent (admittedly not great though)”
Comment from 10 Aug 2026 in “Meta Muse Glimmer – open weights 30B local coding model” “yet another mediocre but fully-made-in-the-West open model”
Comment from 6 Oct 2026 in “Beam: Reflection's 501B open-weight model”
Other open-weight language models people recommend
The four most recommended other open-weight language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.8 27B | 1,173 | 426 | 73% | 13 | 2 mo32 owners | Approved |
| Z.ai GLM | 1,043 | 384 | 73% | 13 | 2 mo52 owners | Approved |
| Kimi | 931 | 359 | 72% | 13 | 1 mo26 owners | Approved |
| Gemma 4 | 713 | 249 | 74% | 13 | 1 mo14 owners | Approved |
| Thinking Machines InklingThis page | 42 | 13 | 76% | 4 | — | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 59 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“Closest in size that's better across that range of benchmarks is Inkling-Small I think, at 276B params”
“yet another mediocre but fully-made-in-the-West open model”
“Every doc opens in a browser straight from disk. No server, no build step, no dependencies.”
“all are fairly decent options at a variety of hardware costs”
“Inkling, e.g. is more accurate in not telling you to adjust valves that are simply not adjustable”
“their Inkling model was decent (admittedly not great though)”
“it's an American open model and is really good!”
“the only big other open source US model that was worth looking at”
“it is SUPER FAST and does a good job at being a terminal buddy”
“Just saw Thinking Machines Inkling model succeed in certain queries”
“Inkling is the most exciting model launch we've seen from an American lab in a while”
“inkling on its own looks high-quality, but expecting companies to spend $ figuring it out before spending more $ on the actual fine-tuning job seems ... hard”
“first seriously competitive non-Chinese open model in a good bit now”
“I enjoyed turning off web search for Inkling to experiment with what innate knowledge is encoded in the model weights.”
“artificial analysis puts it quite low below previous gen open weights models from China”
“it debuts at #41 on the AA index and the post itself calls it not the strongest overall”
“It is surprisingly capable for coding despite its tiny size.”
“It looks promising, but on my cases it still fell short of GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.6 Luna.”
“not obsessed with benchmaxxing on coding but rather being adaptable to the task required”
“I got far enough to run some tests on the openai endpoint, albeit with some finagling”
“accurately answered a number of questions focused on very niche details”
“open source matches their business model, which is to provide fine tuning services for enterprises, etc.”
“It does worse in most benchmarks”
“This is the best voice/tone I've seen from any model so far.”
“This is the first competitive non-Chinese open weights model since what, Llama 3?”
“I always have to clear context btw 150k-400k context even if the context window is 1M on paper.”
“accurate, inexpensive open-weight workhorse for high-level prioritization and decision-making work”
“seems pretty dang snappy and I like it's tone/personality so far”
“This seems like a really really great debut model for a new lab”
“Very impressive model, exciting to see an American open-source lab with such competitive results.”
“Excited to see the next generations of Thinky models.”
“this model should really shine in Autoresearch NanoGPT-style speedruns”
“releasing a decent open weights model in 16 months is actually quite comparable”
“This seems like an extremely strong model for a first release”
“For a first model, and given it's open, I am gaining some faith in American Open research labs again...”
“debuts at 41 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index”
“This has all the right ingredients for success.”
“Its not as good as GLM 5.2 for agentic workflows while also being bigger.”
“Seems like this is particularly good at instruction following”
“best western open weights model- very cool.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.