Hacker ApprovedDepartments

ICU library

Shares rank 2 of 3 unicode libraries by recommenders

Widely recommended as the standard Unicode and globalization library, seen as well engineered. Common caveat: easy to misuse, especially around normalization.

Widely recommended as the standard Unicode and globalization library, seen as well engineered. Common caveat: easy to misuse, especially around normalization.

6 people gave an opinion

recommend it
5
criticize it
1
approval share
83%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 3 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Seen as the best standard

    “it’s the best standard we have”

    Comment from 16 Dec 2025 in “Full Unicode Search at 50× ICU Speed with AVX‑512”
  • Excellent, well-engineered library

    “I think what you are asking for already exists in the excellent ICU library.”

    Comment from 25 Nov 2025 in “APT Rust requirement raises questions”

    “Not to say ICU isn't a nice bit of engineering.”

    Comment from 16 Nov 2025 in “Brimstone: ES2025 JavaScript engine written in Rust”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Easy to misuse, normalization pitfalls

    “Yes, though it's easy to not use the ICU library properly or run into issues wrt normalization etc”

    Comment from 16 Nov 2025 in “Brimstone: ES2025 JavaScript engine written in Rust”

Other unicode libraries people recommend

The two most recommended other unicode libraries, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

ICU library compared with 2 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
chardet72125%1——
ICU libraryThis page5183%3——
Mojibake Unicode library5183%1——
See all 3 unicode libraries, ranked

What people said

5 of the 6 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“it’s the best standard we have”

RecommendsComment from 16 Dec 2025 in “Full Unicode Search at 50× ICU Speed with AVX‑512”

“ICU and your fancy library are incorrect, actually.”

CriticizesComment from 16 Dec 2025 in “Full Unicode Search at 50× ICU Speed with AVX‑512”

“I think what you are asking for already exists in the excellent ICU library.”

RecommendsComment from 25 Nov 2025 in “APT Rust requirement raises questions”

“Yes, though it's easy to not use the ICU library properly or run into issues wrt normalization etc”

MixedComment from 16 Nov 2025 in “Brimstone: ES2025 JavaScript engine written in Rust”

“Not to say ICU isn't a nice bit of engineering.”

RecommendsComment from 16 Nov 2025 in “Brimstone: ES2025 JavaScript engine written in Rust”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.