Skip to content

Computers · ai accelerator

Groq LPU

Recommended for fast, efficient AI inference, using SRAM instead of HBM. Critics point to small per-chip SRAM and hard deployment requirements.

Summarized from 12 comments.

Recommended for fast, efficient AI inference, using SRAM instead of HBM. Critics point to small per-chip SRAM and hard deployment requirements.

recommend
9
criticize
2
months recommended
5 of 13

Why people love it

  • Faster, more efficient inference than GPUs · 4

    A cluster of LPUv2s would probably be faster and cheaper than an Infiniband cluster of Epycs.

    Dec 2025 · comment

    DRAM-based GPUs/TPUs are quite inefficient for inference compared to SRAM-based Groq/Cerebras

    Feb 2026 · comment

    No HBM needed on this card, and 32x faster inference than today's best GPUs at inference!

    May 2026 · comment
  • HBM-free design avoids constrained supply · 2

    Groq's technical decisions are unsound in a normal world. But being HBM-free may have some merit in a world where HBM supply is constrained.

    Dec 2025 · comment

    No HBM needed on this card, and 32x faster inference than today's best GPUs at inference!

    May 2026 · comment
  • Credible alternative to GPUs · 2

    Google's TPU and Groq's LPU are the only real, commercially viable ways to provide all the compute required for the inference people want.

    Jun 2026 · comment

    The most rapid path that Intel has to selling competitive GPUs, would be to licence designs from Groq

    Feb 2026 · comment

What people warn about

  • Small SRAM per chip · 2

    Groq's chips only have 230MB of SRAM per chip vs 80GB on an H100

    Dec 2025 · comment

    they scale the number of chips to fit a single model when they have no dram

    Dec 2025 · comment

What hackers pick instead

Every quote

The 12 most detailed of 12 comments. Each links to the original.

  1. Groq's technical decisions are unsound in a normal world. But being HBM-free may have some merit in a world where HBM supply is constrained.

    Mixed · Dec 2025 · in “Nvidia buying AI chip startup Groq for about $20B in cash”

  2. Google's TPU and Groq's LPU are the only real, commercially viable ways to provide all the compute required for the inference people want.

    Recommends · Jun 2026 · in “Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models”

  3. The most rapid path that Intel has to selling competitive GPUs, would be to licence designs from Groq

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “Intel will start making GPUs”

  4. A cluster of LPUv2s would probably be faster and cheaper than an Infiniband cluster of Epycs.

    Recommends · Dec 2025 · in “macOS 26.2 enables fast AI clusters with RDMA over Thunderbolt”

  5. DRAM-based GPUs/TPUs are quite inefficient for inference compared to SRAM-based Groq/Cerebras

    Recommends · Feb 2026 · in “How Taalas "prints" LLM onto a chip?”

  6. No HBM needed on this card, and 32x faster inference than today's best GPUs at inference!

    Mixed · May 2026 · in “Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX”

  7. Groq's chips only have 230MB of SRAM per chip vs 80GB on an H100

    Mixed · Dec 2025 · in “Nvidia's $20B Antitrust Loophole (Not an Acquisition)”

  8. Their LPUs are way more efficient for inference.

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Furiosa: 3.5x efficiency over H100s”

  9. they scale the number of chips to fit a single model when they have no dram

    Criticizes · Dec 2025 · in “Nvidia buying AI chip startup Groq for about $20B in cash”

  10. Gives NVIDIA a whole lineup of inference-focused hardware that iirc can retrofit into existing air cooled data centres

    Recommends · Jan 2026 · in “Furiosa: 3.5x efficiency over H100s”

  11. has near impossible requirements for deployment

    Mixed · Dec 2025 · in “Nvidia buying AI chip startup Groq for about $20B in cash”

  12. now worthless ASICs are rotting

    Criticizes · Jul 2026 · in “Kimi K3 is now live”

Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake