GLM 5.3 Flash
Hacker ApprovedRanked 8 of 39 open-weight language models by recommenders
An MIT-licensed open-weight model with near-frontier coding ability at a fraction of the cost, runnable locally or via many hosts; critics distrust Z.ai's terms and China ties.
An MIT-licensed open-weight model with near-frontier coding ability at a fraction of the cost, runnable locally or via many hosts; critics distrust Z.ai's terms and China ties.
257 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 192
- criticize it
- 65
- approval share
- 75%
Recommended in 7 of 13 months
- November 2025: not recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: not recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: recommended (month in progress)
Owned for 1 month
Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.
Each square is one year.
Why it carries the badge
- 192 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 3 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 7 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Near-frontier intelligence and coding
“GLM 5.3 Flash feels like it oscillates between "I can't believe it's not Sonnet", but it costs a fraction of that”
Comment from 11 Sep 2026 in “So you want to use OpenRouter?” “GLM 5.3 flash matches Opus 4.8 in general intelligence, and somewhere in the Opus 4.7–4.8 band for coding.”
Comment from 3 Oct 2026 in “One month coding with GLM 5.3 Flash” “today was the first time ever that a local model (GLM5.3 8-bit) was able to match fable5 in our tests”
Comment from 2 Sep 2026 in “My local model setup on an M4 Pro Mac Mini” - Comment from 20 Oct 2026 in “MiniMax M3.1 Flash”
- Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis”
- Comment from 21 Sep 2026 in “Fable 5 – Median thinking declined in August”
- Comment from 29 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5”
- Comment from 3 Sep 2026 in “LLMs: Intelligence vs. Cost”
Far cheaper than rivals
“GLM 5.3 Flash feels like it oscillates between "I can't believe it's not Sonnet", but it costs a fraction of that”
Comment from 11 Sep 2026 in “So you want to use OpenRouter?” “GLM-5.3-Flash is actually cheaper than deepseek and better than deepseek but no one is talking about yet”
Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3 is now open-weight” “they flow well while also being accurate & including necessary keywords, and being highly affordable”
Comment from 21 Sep 2026 in “MiMo v2.6” - Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 28 Sep 2026 in “Sonnet 5.5”
- Comment from 28 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3 is now open-weight”
Open weights, runs locally
“The model is MIT-licensed, so run it on any of the non-Chinese inference providers that will host it in a few days.”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” “you're no longer reliant on a subscription, a working network connection, or the servers not being overloaded”
Comment from 30 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis” “when multiple quality USA vendors provide models like GLM 5.3-flash, I run locally just for the fun of it”
Comment from 2 Sep 2026 in “Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1” - Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 2 Sep 2026 in “My local model setup on an M4 Pro Mac Mini”
- Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
Capable for agentic coding work
“I used Sol and GLM 5.3 Flash to produce a prototype of a tower defense game for myself, and it works just fine.”
Comment from 28 Oct 2026 in “The October inflection point for vibe game development” “perfectly capable of following my spec and then poking holes in the implementation till there are none left”
Comment from 23 Sep 2026 in “GPT-6 Sol and Luna” “it seems good enough for coding features if you have a good structure and a good AGENTS.md”
Comment from 8 Oct 2026 in “Why isn't the industry freaking out about DeepSeek 4.1 Flash?” - Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 9 Oct 2026 in “Why isn't the industry freaking out about DeepSeek 4.1 Flash?”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Z.ai terms and China concerns
“the CCP has enough oversight and control (either explicitly or by the companies making these decisions by default) that they will alter the models to benefit China”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” “Except when their automated reviews decides that you've written something dangerous, in which case they'll use it for training.”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” “If Z.ai uses its absolute powers to ban you because you wrote a review about them or something, then you lose actual money.”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” - Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
- Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
Fails or loops on long tasks
“it's just way too often I'd run it on some long running task and come back to it repeating the same tokens”
Comment from 28 Sep 2026 in “Sonnet 5.5” “couldn't get it to finish any task that took more then an hour with /goal keep getting errors”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” “it ran like shit. Very slow (~20tps, VERY high latency) and it would timeout all the time.”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash” Weaker than full GLM 5.3
“GLM 5.3 Flash is better if you need native multi-modal capabilities, higher speed, and lower costs, but worse than vanilla 5.3 in raw reasoning and for complex programming.”
Comment from 15 Oct 2026 in “Muse Spark Open” “this one far underperforms relative to GLM 5.3 from every test I've done for real-world cybersecurity tasks”
Comment from 20 Oct 2026 in “MiniMax M3.1 Flash” Slow per task
“GLM-5.3-Flash takes 7x (relative to Gemini and Sol) per task. So, it's cheaper, if you don't value your time!”
Comment from 27 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis” “it ran like shit. Very slow (~20tps, VERY high latency) and it would timeout all the time.”
Comment from 26 Aug 2026 in “GLM-5.3-Flash”
Other open-weight language models people recommend
The four most recommended other open-weight language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.8 27B | 1,173 | 426 | 73% | 13 | 2 mo32 owners | Approved |
| Z.ai GLM | 1,043 | 384 | 73% | 13 | 2 mo52 owners | Approved |
| Kimi | 931 | 359 | 72% | 13 | 1 mo26 owners | Approved |
| Gemma 4 | 713 | 249 | 74% | 13 | 1 mo14 owners | Approved |
| GLM 5.3 Flash | 192 | 65 | 75% | 7 | 1 mo4 owners | Approved |
What people said
40 of the 332 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“these open models (GLM particularly) were among the best of all LLM's on their benchmarks”
“I used Sol and GLM 5.3 Flash to produce a prototype of a tower defense game for myself, and it works just fine.”
“this one far underperforms relative to GLM 5.3 from every test I've done for real-world cybersecurity tasks”
“Lately I prefer GLM5.3-Flash since I feel it is noticeably smarter and I have the hardware for it”
“GLM 5.3 Flash is better if you need native multi-modal capabilities, higher speed, and lower costs, but worse than vanilla 5.3 in raw reasoning and for complex programming.”
“GLM5.3 Flash + OMP and DeepSeek Flash as advisor to be able to get jobs done just fine”
“it seems good enough for coding features if you have a good structure and a good AGENTS.md”
“GLM 5.3 flash matches Opus 4.8 in general intelligence, and somewhere in the Opus 4.7–4.8 band for coding.”
“it doesn't seem to reason holistically about code and over-engineers solutions to each specific problem it solves”
“it's just way too often I'd run it on some long running task and come back to it repeating the same tokens”
“there were open models like GLM-5.3 Flash that blew it out of the water at 1/20th of the price”
“I've been using GLM-5.3-Flash on Ollama Cloud's $20/mo plan and using OpenCode's free models to do a LOT of work”
“perfectly capable of following my spec and then poking holes in the implementation till there are none left”
“If benchmarks are anything to go by, Flash is like having a local Terra-tier coding model”
“they flow well while also being accurate & including necessary keywords, and being highly affordable”
“GLM 5.3 Flash feels like it oscillates between "I can't believe it's not Sonnet", but it costs a fraction of that”
“I've been very impressed with GLM 5.3 Flash's performance even without considering cost”
“when multiple quality USA vendors provide models like GLM 5.3-flash, I run locally just for the fun of it”
“today was the first time ever that a local model (GLM5.3 8-bit) was able to match fable5 in our tests”
“you're no longer reliant on a subscription, a working network connection, or the servers not being overloaded”
“I would still rather have 30 tokens per second of GLM 5.3 Flash than 100 tokens per second of Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B.”
“GLM 5.3 Flash is equivalent to 5.2, which is still awesome considering it's 10x-17x cheaper”
“GLM-5.3-Flash is actually cheaper than deepseek and better than deepseek but no one is talking about yet”
“very capable especially with tool calling, workflows, logic and its base coding ability”
“I suspect any model connected or built by China will serve their interest despite their terms and agreements.”
“GLM-5.3-Flash takes 7x (relative to Gemini and Sol) per task. So, it's cheaper, if you don't value your time!”
“And neither will they make clear what "analytical purposes" is for the data you can't opt out of.”
“Broad and perpetual license over inputs and outputs, and even your name and profile picture.”
“the CCP has enough oversight and control (either explicitly or by the companies making these decisions by default) that they will alter the models to benefit China”
“for heavy users this could justify buying $10k worth of hardware with a ROI over a few months”
“It managed the refactoring in blazing colors, and the resulting UI looked really good.”
“It's feeling good on non-pelican workloads too. Less verbose than 5.3, cheaper/higher usage limits”
“Except when their automated reviews decides that you've written something dangerous, in which case they'll use it for training.”
“couldn't get it to finish any task that took more then an hour with /goal keep getting errors”
“If Z.ai uses its absolute powers to ban you because you wrote a review about them or something, then you lose actual money.”
“Can ban you if you, in the "sole and absolute opinion" of Z.ai, have violated these broad terms”
“The model is MIT-licensed, so run it on any of the non-Chinese inference providers that will host it in a few days.”
“Impressive. It kicked everything between itself and Sol xhigh out of the Pareto frontier.”
“it ran like shit. Very slow (~20tps, VERY high latency) and it would timeout all the time.”
“having an open-weight comparable to close to SOTA makes it very compelling for me to try it out locally”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.