Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Glass photo sharing

Ranked 2 of 3 photo sharing services by recommenders

People recommend Glass as a photo-sharing service with a well-considered UI/UX and a sustainable, profitable business model, though it requires payment.

People recommend Glass as a photo-sharing service with a well-considered UI/UX and a sustainable, profitable business model, though it requires payment.

8 people gave an opinion

recommend it
7
criticize it
1
approval share
88%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 4 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 7 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 7 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Paid subscription is a high barrier

    “I actually quite like it. You have to pay, though, which is a high entrance barrier”

    Comment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”
  • Upload limit of 10 photos at once

    “It doesn‘t allow to upload more than 10 photos at once, and if you upload 2 or more you have to put them in a so-called series”

    Comment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”
  • Unclear long-term survival

    “the service probably won't survive the next 5-10 years, but at least the UI/UX is done with some thought”

    Comment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

Other photo sharing services people recommend

The two most recommended other photo sharing services, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Glass photo sharing compared with 2 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Flickr542965%720 yrs12 owners—
Glass photo sharingThis page7188%4——
SmugMug6275%4——
See all 3 photo sharing services, ranked

What people said

6 of the 8 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“I'm currently doing this with https://github.com/fixed-width/glass (see ci & release workflows)”

RecommendsComment from 24 Oct 2026 in “Ask HN: Windows Signing for FOSS Projects”

“has a sustainable business model, has been profitable since day 1”

RecommendsComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

“the service probably won't survive the next 5-10 years, but at least the UI/UX is done with some thought”

MixedComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

“It doesn‘t allow to upload more than 10 photos at once, and if you upload 2 or more you have to put them in a so-called series”

CriticizesComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

“I publish all my photos on my own website and syndicate them to (in order of preference): Glass, Pixelfed”

RecommendsComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

“I actually quite like it. You have to pay, though, which is a high entrance barrier”

RecommendsComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “Flickr: The First and Last Great Photo Platform”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.