Gitoxide
Hacker ApprovedThe most recommended of 4 Git implementations
Praised as a fast, high quality Rust implementation of Git that people find great to use; the most common caveat is that it is not yet feature complete, especially networking.
Praised as a fast, high quality Rust implementation of Git that people find great to use; the most common caveat is that it is not yet feature complete, especially networking.
15 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 13
- criticize it
- 2
- approval share
- 87%
Recommended in 5 of 13 months
- November 2025: not recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: not recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 13 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 6.5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Active development and Rust adoption
“Gitoxide is great and we will continue to push it forward.”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “has some reasonable adoption in the rust ecosystem”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “actively using and developing Gitoxide as well”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” Faster and better than alternatives
“both Gitoxide (Rust) and libgit2 are both better, they're just not feature complete”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “they are faster and better in nearly every way, but they are not feature complete”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” Praised as high quality and great
“a high quality, hand crafted, opinionated partial Git library”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “Gitoxide exists and is great.”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Not feature complete
“both Gitoxide (Rust) and libgit2 are both better, they're just not feature complete”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “they are faster and better in nearly every way, but they are not feature complete”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” “Gitoxide and libgit2 are both awesome but they are not feature complete.”
Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents” Networking features partial or missing
“there's still some missing features in the networking part, but the local-file-manipulation features are fully there”
Comment from 23 Jul 2026 in “git's –end-of-options Flag” “Currently both Gitoxide and libgit2's networking functionality is either partial, slow or non-existant.”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Grit: Rewriting Git in Rust with Agents”
Other Git implementations people recommend
The three most recommended other Git implementations, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitoxideThis page | 13 | 2 | 87% | 5 | — | Approved |
| libgit2 | 8 | 7 | 53% | 6 | — | — |
| Grit Git rewrite in Rust | 7 | 37 | 16% | 3 | — | — |
| ziggit | 6 | 7 | 46% | 2 | — | — |
What people said
18 of the 21 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“custom Gitoxide ODB and (eventually) ref storage backends can help the server scale”
“there's still some missing features in the networking part, but the local-file-manipulation features are fully there”
“an incremental git blame engine built on top of GitOxide as our backend is fully built on Rust”
“Wouldn't gitoxide already be 90% there for your usecase?”
“Given that the author read the docs and source code, and literally copied files over from the git source, it also is license-washing.”
“a high quality, hand crafted, opinionated partial Git library”
“Gitoxide is great and we will continue to push it forward.”
“Gitoxide exists and is great.”
“has some reasonable adoption in the rust ecosystem”
“both Gitoxide (Rust) and libgit2 are both better, they're just not feature complete”
“actively using and developing Gitoxide as well”
“Gitoxide and libgit2 are both awesome but they are not feature complete.”
“as much as I love and support those projects”
“they are faster and better in nearly every way, but they are not feature complete”
“similar (not vibe coded, less fully featured) gitoxide project”
“Currently both Gitoxide and libgit2's networking functionality is either partial, slow or non-existant.”
“that has support for Windows where-as Grit does not”
“I've enjoyed git on rust via gitoxide”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.