Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Gemini 4 Argon

Ranked 15 of 72 language models by recommenders

Praised for natural, elegant writing, multilingual answers and strong vision and benchmark results, though Pro-plan usage limits are very low and Google's rollout and interfaces feel confusing.

Praised for natural, elegant writing, multilingual answers and strong vision and benchmark results, though Pro-plan usage limits are very low and Google's rollout and interfaces feel confusing.

347 people gave an opinion

recommend it
168
criticize it
179
approval share
48%
Each figure is 5 people. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 3 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: recommended (month in progress)

Owned for 1 month

Median of the 4 owners who said how long they have had it.

Each square is one year.

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 168 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 0.9 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Natural, elegant writing

    “For Argon, it's natural language writing and everything that hooks up to Google, e.g. search and maps-based itinerary planning.”

    Comment from 17 Oct 2026 in “DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash-1017”

    “This is my new favorite general-purpose/non-coding model. It's surprising how good this thing is”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “asked it to rewrite for natural reading and clarity, and got the current README. I'm impressed!”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Show HN: Pippin – macOS High-Performance Screen Sharing Client for Linux”
  • Strong benchmark results

    “Considering Opus 5.5 only gets a 4% on the test compared to Gemini’s 20%, that’s actually pretty incredible.”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “The ~200% improvement over the next nearest competitor on Harvey's Legal Benchmark is astounding.”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “It shows a good improvement on my COCO object detection benchmark: 0.504 mAP zero-shot.”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”
  • Good spatial and visual reasoning

    “Hate to say i will never be touching this model for anything except for youtube video understanding”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “It shows a good improvement on my COCO object detection benchmark: 0.504 mAP zero-shot.”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “argon seems to be really good at spatial reasoning, it's catching really minute details”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”
  • Handles non-English languages well

    “Gemini almost always answers accurately and very close to how helpful they are in Anglosphere related topics”

    Comment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “It feels like it's trained in multiple languages from the ground up rather than as an afterthought.”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Very low Pro-plan usage limits

    “The capacity limitations I've experienced with them in the past have been deeply problematic.”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “took weeks to "come out" after their public announcement and when it finally did, paying Google AI plan users couldn't access Argon”

    Comment from 28 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon”

    “4 messages on medium triggers the cooldown. The utility isn't really relevant if you're on the Pro plan.”

    Comment from 29 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5”
  • Confusing rollout and user experience

    “The model is good. But... the way google handled introduction of Argon is a great reminder that your business should stay far away from their products.”

    Comment from 20 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon is now available for everyone”

    “Setting terrible guardrails, banchmaxxing, having 5 different approved ways of starting with models where 3 of them will be obsolete in 6m”

    Comment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “Can they now go hire some really good information architects and designers and come up with a cohesive user experience please.”

    Comment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”
  • Unreliable on coding, bigger tasks

    “My impression is not good. Maybe it's due to first-day high user counts, but it seems to be doing worse than 3.8 flash in some coding tasks.”

    Comment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “Within one question of their web interface, it has lost context and asks you to clarify what you are talking about.”

    Comment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “I don't find Argon to be usable for any big tasks because it really does a big mess every now and then”

    Comment from 24 Oct 2026 in “Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed”
  • Behind frontier rivals, benchmarks doubted

    “I'd put it at B tier, just under gpt 6.1 sol. It isn't A tier like Opus 5.5 or Astra.”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

    “It’s mildly impressive, but Google should be wiping the floor with its competition”

    Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics”

    “Google's benchmark results are not useful at all. If you look at their methodology, they only present the model's performance at the Max reasoning levels.”

    Comment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

Other language models people recommend

The four most recommended other language models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Gemini 4 Argon compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Claude Opus3,3312,74655%134 mo156 owners—
OpenAI GPT1,20598755%136 mo47 owners—
Claude Sonnet85458659%136 mo46 owners—
DeepSeek V4 Flash82822379%81 mo24 ownersApproved
Gemini 4 ArgonThis page16817948%31 mo4 owners—
See all 72 language models, ranked

What people said

40 of the 401 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“I now asked Argon for a pretty elaborate review and it used only 2% so I will be giving it another shot.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon”

“the limits are dreadfully low. Five messages on medium is already enough to trigger a 4 hour cooldown”

CriticizesComment from 29 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5”

“4 messages on medium triggers the cooldown. The utility isn't really relevant if you're on the Pro plan.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5”

“I am having a very positive experience with Argon: since it was launched I accessed it through Ultragravity”

RecommendsComment from 29 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5”

“it's become my daily driver for anything requiring moderate smarts or lots of prose”

RecommendsComment from 28 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon”

“it's noticeably better than pretty much everything in my own weird game based benchmark”

RecommendsComment from 28 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon”

“took weeks to "come out" after their public announcement and when it finally did, paying Google AI plan users couldn't access Argon”

CriticizesComment from 28 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Carbon”

“I don't find Argon to be usable for any big tasks because it really does a big mess every now and then”

CriticizesComment from 24 Oct 2026 in “Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed”

“The model is good. But... the way google handled introduction of Argon is a great reminder that your business should stay far away from their products.”

MixedComment from 20 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon is now available for everyone”

“For Argon, it's natural language writing and everything that hooks up to Google, e.g. search and maps-based itinerary planning.”

RecommendsComment from 17 Oct 2026 in “DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash-1017”

“it's a joke of an implementation. You have to manually approve each tool use each and every time with no way to "Always allow"”

CriticizesComment from 16 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“My impression is not good. Maybe it's due to first-day high user counts, but it seems to be doing worse than 3.8 flash in some coding tasks.”

CriticizesComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“this sort of technology opens up a universe of bespoke micro-explainers and apps that meet you exactly where you are”

RecommendsComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Gemini almost always answers accurately and very close to how helpful they are in Anglosphere related topics”

RecommendsComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“experiment with a fairly open platform that may play, as a category, a pivotable role in humanity”

RecommendsComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics”

“Outside of that, behavior is quite good, a bit slow, and definitely different than both GPTs and Claudes”

MixedComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“this is the first time I get something that, while still needing some tweaks, basically looks like the patch sheet”

RecommendsComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“But you don’t create a broken or confusing experience for the people who haven’t been added to the rollout group yet.”

CriticizesComment from 14 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“argon seems to be really good at spatial reasoning, it's catching really minute details”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“This is my new favorite general-purpose/non-coding model. It's surprising how good this thing is”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“It’s mildly impressive, but Google should be wiping the floor with its competition”

MixedComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics”

“It shows a good improvement on my COCO object detection benchmark: 0.504 mAP zero-shot.”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Argon 4 takes a lot of precautions to avoid crashing against walls and other objects”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics”

“asked it to rewrite for natural reading and clarity, and got the current README. I'm impressed!”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Show HN: Pippin – macOS High-Performance Screen Sharing Client for Linux”

“It feels like it's trained in multiple languages from the ground up rather than as an afterthought.”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Considering Opus 5.5 only gets a 4% on the test compared to Gemini’s 20%, that’s actually pretty incredible.”

RecommendsComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“I'd put it at B tier, just under gpt 6.1 sol. It isn't A tier like Opus 5.5 or Astra.”

MixedComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“The language appears much more natural and elegant than what even Opus 5.5 or Astra do.”

MixedComment from 13 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Google's benchmark results are not useful at all. If you look at their methodology, they only present the model's performance at the Max reasoning levels.”

CriticizesComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Setting terrible guardrails, banchmaxxing, having 5 different approved ways of starting with models where 3 of them will be obsolete in 6m”

CriticizesComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“You have the established company with tons of traininv resources at tgeir disposal from all their services”

RecommendsComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Can they now go hire some really good information architects and designers and come up with a cohesive user experience please.”

MixedComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“This release is behind the most recent models so no leapfrogging here more like catching up (barely)”

CriticizesComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“its outcome is usually better than mine and the cost to verify the outcome is significantly cheaper than doing the task by myself”

RecommendsComment from 1 Oct 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“The capacity limitations I've experienced with them in the past have been deeply problematic.”

MixedComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Hopefully, Argon isn't as prone to satisficing and premature convergence compared to its predecessor”

MixedComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“nothing about this announcement gives me confidence that google is back on track as a model provider”

CriticizesComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“The ~200% improvement over the next nearest competitor on Harvey's Legal Benchmark is astounding.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Within one question of their web interface, it has lost context and asks you to clarify what you are talking about.”

CriticizesComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

“Hate to say i will never be touching this model for anything except for youtube video understanding”

MixedComment from 30 Sep 2026 in “Gemini 4 Argon”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.