Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Forgejo Actions

Hacker Approved

Shares rank 9 of 20 CI/CD services by recommenders

People recommend it as a refined, GitHub Actions-like CI system that is easy to use and free. Caveats: Linux-only runners and occasional jobs not being picked up.

People recommend it as a refined, GitHub Actions-like CI system that is easy to use and free. Caveats: Linux-only runners and occasional jobs not being picked up.

16 people gave an opinion

recommend it
15
criticize it
1
approval share
94%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 7 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 15 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 15 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 7 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Familiar to GitHub Actions users

    “on the whole, Forgejo Actions has really just felt like a much more refined and cared-for version of GitHub Actions; I'm quite happy with it so far.”

    Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “Ask YN: What CI do you use instead of GitHub Actions?”

    “It's quite straightforward if you're already familiar with Github Actions.”

    Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “Migrating Dillo from GitHub”

    “Forgejo Actions is designed to be similar to GH Actions”

    Comment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub”
  • Easy to set up

    “It's quite straightforward if you're already familiar with Github Actions.”

    Comment from 30 Nov 2025 in “Migrating Dillo from GitHub”

    “was able to set it up for my Python repos in 15 minutes”

    Comment from 13 May 2026 in “Why I'm leaving GitHub for Forgejo”
  • Actively improving with Kubernetes runners

    “Their v15 release (apr 16) really enabled k8s native runners.”

    Comment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

    “Forgejo Action's implementation is still actively improving”

    Comment from 8 Dec 2025 in “GitHub Actions has a package manager, and it might be the worst”

Other CI/CD services people recommend

The four most recommended other CI/CD services, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Forgejo Actions compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
GitHub Actions23474124%122 yrs21 owners—
Jenkins675754%9——
GitLab CI562569%113 yrs9 ownersApproved
Dagger432365%10——
Forgejo ActionsThis page15194%7—Approved
See all 20 CI/CD services, ranked

What people said

16 of the 17 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Their v15 release (apr 16) really enabled k8s native runners.”

RecommendsComment from 18 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

“I think my biggest complaint is that they haven't exposed action logs over the API”

MixedComment from 17 Aug 2026 in “Ask HN: Alternatives to GitHub”

“there's an integrated system called "actions"”

RecommendsComment from 18 Jun 2026 in “Ask HN: Looking for a CI/CD project for my local lab”

“I experimented with a Forgejo Actions runner, but the problem that I had was there's not a great way to manage the context there”

CriticizesComment from 16 Jun 2026 in “My Homelab AI Dev Platform”

“was able to set it up for my Python repos in 15 minutes”

RecommendsComment from 13 May 2026 in “Why I'm leaving GitHub for Forgejo”

“there have been a few papercuts (mostly trying to figure out why runners aren't picking up jobs)”

MixedComment from 13 May 2026 in “Why I'm leaving GitHub for Forgejo”

“Forgejo Actions is designed to be similar to GH Actions”

RecommendsComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Ghostty is leaving GitHub”

“Forgejo Actions are Linux only.”

MixedComment from 29 Apr 2026 in “Before GitHub”

“I'd suggest also moving to Forgejo Actions if you're moving anyways”

RecommendsComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “GitHub RCE Vulnerability: CVE-2026-3854 Breakdown”

“Community software like act and Forgejo/Gitea Actions have made it a lot easier to run GitHub Actions workflows without involving GitHub”

RecommendsComment from 20 Dec 2025 in “GitHub postponing the announced billing change for self-hosted GitHub Actions”

“Forgejo Action's implementation is still actively improving”

MixedComment from 8 Dec 2025 in “GitHub Actions has a package manager, and it might be the worst”

“the runner is lightweight, fast, and reliable”

RecommendsComment from 3 Dec 2025 in “Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service”

“on the whole, Forgejo Actions has really just felt like a much more refined and cared-for version of GitHub Actions; I'm quite happy with it so far.”

RecommendsComment from 1 Dec 2025 in “Ask YN: What CI do you use instead of GitHub Actions?”

“It's quite straightforward if you're already familiar with Github Actions.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Nov 2025 in “Migrating Dillo from GitHub”

“it is definitely working for me”

MixedComment from 30 Nov 2025 in “Migrating Dillo from GitHub”

“it fixes most of our serious problems with GitHub Actions”

RecommendsComment from 27 Nov 2025 in “Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.