Hacker ApprovedDepartments

English Standard Version Bible

Shares rank 5 of 6 bible translations by recommenders

Recommended as a sound, close-to-the-source translation for personal reading and study. Its biases are unavoidable, but mostly obvious.

Recommended as a sound, close-to-the-source translation for personal reading and study. Its biases are unavoidable, but mostly obvious.

3 people gave an opinion

recommend it
3
criticize it
0
approval share
100%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 3 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 3 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • Nobody criticizes itNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Used personally for reading and study

    “The ESV is the translation I have used since it came out for personal reading and study”

    Comment from 25 Dec 2025 in “Tell HN: Merry Christmas!”
  • Much closer to the source

    “Modern translations like ESV are much closer to source”

    Comment from 22 Feb 2026 in “How far back in time can you understand English?”
  • Not bad overall

    “The ESV is not bad. It has its (unavoidable) biases but they are mostly of the obvious sort”

    Comment from 21 Nov 2025 in “How to stay sane in a world that rewards insanity”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Unavoidable but mostly obvious biases

    “The ESV is not bad. It has its (unavoidable) biases but they are mostly of the obvious sort”

    Comment from 21 Nov 2025 in “How to stay sane in a world that rewards insanity”

Other bible translations people recommend

The four most recommended other bible translations, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

English Standard Version Bible compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
New Revised Standard Version Bibleby Bible60100%4——
New International Version Bibleby Elizabeth Heike and Peter Toon5550%3——
New King James Version Bibleby Thomas Nelson4180%4——
New Living Translation Bibleby Tyndale House Publishers Staff40100%3——
English Standard Version BibleThis page30100%3——
See all 6 bible translations, ranked

What people said

All 3 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Modern translations like ESV are much closer to source”

RecommendsComment from 22 Feb 2026 in “How far back in time can you understand English?”

“The ESV is the translation I have used since it came out for personal reading and study”

RecommendsComment from 25 Dec 2025 in “Tell HN: Merry Christmas!”

“The ESV is not bad. It has its (unavoidable) biases but they are mostly of the obvious sort”

MixedComment from 21 Nov 2025 in “How to stay sane in a world that rewards insanity”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.