Hacker ApprovedDepartments

DeepSeek-OCR

Hacker Approved

Ranked 4 of 11 OCR models by recommenders

Free open-weights OCR model praised for compressing text into fewer tokens and strong results in use. Critics say newer models now beat it.

Free open-weights OCR model praised for compressing text into fewer tokens and strong results in use. Critics say newer models now beat it.

16 people gave an opinion

recommend it
12
criticize it
4
approval share
75%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 9 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: recommended
  5. March 2026: recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it carries the badge

  • 12 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 3 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 9 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Visual compression cuts token costs

    “DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text, which was a groundbreaking result.”

    Comment from 3 Jul 2026 in “60% Fable cost cut by converting code to images and having the model OCR it”

    “in theory this could cut costs pretty well for long contexts + there no tokenisation layer.”

    Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Dessa: Conversation Model trained only on speech”

    “images can be profoundly more token-efficient encodings of information than even CSVs”

    Comment from 1 Nov 2025 in “Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)”
  • Works well in practice

    “vLLM gave me enormous throughput improvements on big documents via continuous batching”

    Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “Google releases Gemma 4 open models”

    “which btw is amazing from my experimentations.”

    Comment from 16 Feb 2026 in “Rolling your own serverless OCR in 40 lines of code”

    “Turns out it works really well”

    Comment from 3 Jul 2026 in “60% Fable cost cut by converting code to images and having the model OCR it”
  • Steady stream of new ideas

    “Every major release from them has brought something really new to the field”

    Comment from 18 Jun 2026 in “DeepSeek Introduces Vision”

    “I love that the entire goal is to push Deepseek OCR further”

    Comment from 23 Jun 2026 in “Unlimited OCR: One-Shot Long-Horizon Parsing”

    “for their valuable models and ideas”

    Comment from 23 Jun 2026 in “Unlimited OCR: One-Shot Long-Horizon Parsing”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Outperformed by newer models

    “Deepseek OCR is no longer state of the art.”

    Comment from 16 Feb 2026 in “Rolling your own serverless OCR in 40 lines of code”

    “performed significantly worse”

    Comment from 24 Aug 2026 in “OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM”

Other OCR models people recommend

The four most recommended other OCR models, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

DeepSeek-OCR compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Mistral OCR694063%12——
PaddleOCR19483%8—Approved
GLM-OCR16480%7—Approved
DeepSeek-OCRThis page12475%9—Approved
dots.ocr8189%5——
See all 11 OCR models, ranked

What people said

14 of the 19 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“in theory this could cut costs pretty well for long contexts + there no tokenisation layer.”

RecommendsComment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Dessa: Conversation Model trained only on speech”

“performed significantly worse”

CriticizesComment from 24 Aug 2026 in “OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM”

“Turns out it works really well”

RecommendsComment from 3 Jul 2026 in “60% Fable cost cut by converting code to images and having the model OCR it”

“DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text, which was a groundbreaking result.”

RecommendsComment from 3 Jul 2026 in “60% Fable cost cut by converting code to images and having the model OCR it”

“I love that the entire goal is to push Deepseek OCR further”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jun 2026 in “Unlimited OCR: One-Shot Long-Horizon Parsing”

“for their valuable models and ideas”

RecommendsComment from 23 Jun 2026 in “Unlimited OCR: One-Shot Long-Horizon Parsing”

“Every major release from them has brought something really new to the field”

RecommendsComment from 18 Jun 2026 in “DeepSeek Introduces Vision”

“smaller open-weights models that are dedicated for OCR tasks”

RecommendsComment from 11 May 2026 in “Local AI needs to be the norm”

“vLLM gave me enormous throughput improvements on big documents via continuous batching”

RecommendsComment from 3 Apr 2026 in “Google releases Gemma 4 open models”

“which btw is amazing from my experimentations.”

RecommendsComment from 16 Feb 2026 in “Rolling your own serverless OCR in 40 lines of code”

“Deepseek OCR is no longer state of the art.”

CriticizesComment from 16 Feb 2026 in “Rolling your own serverless OCR in 40 lines of code”

“Both versions of DeepseekOCR have the same problem.”

CriticizesComment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GLM-OCR: Accurate × Fast × Comprehensive”

“They never actually test that pipeline.”

CriticizesComment from 10 Dec 2025 in “[Re:DeepSeek-OCR] Optical Context Compression Is Just (Bad) Autoencoding”

“images can be profoundly more token-efficient encodings of information than even CSVs”

RecommendsComment from 1 Nov 2025 in “Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.