Continue? Y/N
Shares rank 19 of 48 browser games by recommenders
Short browser game where you approve or deny AI agent shell commands, showing how security-conscious you are. Critics say it is too easy and misjudges which commands are safe.
Short browser game where you approve or deny AI agent shell commands, showing how security-conscious you are. Critics say it is too easy and misjudges which commands are safe.
19 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 13
- criticize it
- 6
- approval share
- 68%
Recommended in 1 of 13 months
- November 2025: not recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: not recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: not recommended
- October 2026: not recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 13 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Fun to play
“Fun game, but it showed the lack of security hygiene employed by the game writer.”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “Fun! Played twice and refused all dangerous commands, with only one "over-block"”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “That was fun and gave me an idea how security conscious I am.”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” Shows how security-conscious you are
“That was fun and gave me an idea how security conscious I am.”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “Nice game to aware the security.”
Comment from 31 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Misjudges which commands are safe
“the game seems to assert that the kill is safe to run”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “It suggests that "kill $(lsof -t -i:3000)" is completely safe, which it's not”
Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “Weird to make reading zshrc supposed unsafe when I happily publish it”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” Threat model seems poorly considered
“Maybe it doesn't really understand the threat model.”
Comment from 28 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue” “The whole premise IMO is pretty flawed.”
Comment from 29 May 2026 in “Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue”
Other browser games people recommend
The four most recommended other browser games, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TinyWind | 61 | 19 | 76% | 1 | — | — |
| Starfling | 59 | 17 | 78% | 1 | — | — |
| Starcraft: Ashfall | 46 | 12 | 79% | 1 | — | — |
| Half-Life 2 in a Browser | 42 | 11 | 79% | 6 | — | Approved |
| Continue? Y/NThis page | 13 | 6 | 68% | 1 | — | — |
What people said
15 of the 19 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“Nice game to aware the security.”
“The whole premise IMO is pretty flawed.”
“It suggests that "kill $(lsof -t -i:3000)" is completely safe, which it's not”
“it's a bit too easy when it's a game where you are expecting dangerous commands”
“A bit too JavaScript specific... can't really play if you don't know that ecosystem.”
“the game seems to assert that the kill is safe to run”
“Weird to make reading zshrc supposed unsafe when I happily publish it”
“Does everyone get a "good" score even if they missed 5 threats?!”
“gray text on a black background is very hard to read on a phone”
“Fun game, but it showed the lack of security hygiene employed by the game writer.”
“Currently you can "cheat" by simply denying all requests as quickly as possible.”
“That was fun and gave me an idea how security conscious I am.”
“Fun! Played twice and refused all dangerous commands, with only one "over-block"”
“Maybe it doesn't really understand the threat model.”
“it was really interesting”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.