Consumer Rights Wiki
Shares rank 4 of 6 online documentations by recommenders
Free wiki of sourced, informative consumer rights material, praised for growing reach. One critic questions its credibility and calls some content AI-generated SEO spam.
Free wiki of sourced, informative consumer rights material, praised for growing reach. One critic questions its credibility and calls some content AI-generated SEO spam.
6 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 5
- criticize it
- 1
- approval share
- 83%
Recommended in 3 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: not recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: not recommended
- July 2026: not recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: not recommended
- October 2026: not recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 5 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
- 5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Informative, well-sourced consumer rights content
“most of which is documented and sourced on his wiki”
Comment from 10 May 2026 in “Louis Rossmann tells 3D printer maker Bambu Lab to 'Go (Bleep) yourself'” “I actually find that site super informative.”
Comment from 21 Aug 2026 in “Consumer Rights Wiki”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Credibility depends on strict policy application
“It is a commendable initiative, but its credibility must be maintained by applying the policies scrupulously.”
Comment from 20 Aug 2026 in “Consumer Rights Wiki” Accused of AI-generated SEO spam
“It's just AI generated SEO spam to promote his repair business.”
Comment from 21 Aug 2026 in “Consumer Rights Wiki”
Other online documentations people recommend
The four most recommended other online documentations, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArchWiki | 86 | 4 | 96% | 10 | — | Approved |
| MSDN | 17 | 10 | 63% | 10 | — | — |
| Gentoo Wiki | 9 | 3 | 75% | 3 | — | — |
| Consumer Rights WikiThis page | 5 | 1 | 83% | 3 | — | — |
| Anthropic documentation | 5 | 4 | 56% | 4 | — | — |
What people said
All 6 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“I actually find that site super informative.”
“It's just AI generated SEO spam to promote his repair business.”
“It is a commendable initiative, but its credibility must be maintained by applying the policies scrupulously.”
“Great to see the Consumer Rights wiki has been picking up steam”
“most of which is documented and sourced on his wiki”
“you can potentially make a page on the Consumer Rights Wiki”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.