Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Computational Physics (2nd Edition)

Computational Physics (2nd Edition) by Giordano and Nakanishi

by Giordano and Nakanishi

Ranked 3 of 13 physics textbooks by recommenders

Recommended as a solid introductory computational physics text with well-structured content and gorgeous LaTeX work. Its matplotlib chapter is considered barebones.

Recommended as a solid introductory computational physics text with well-structured content and gorgeous LaTeX work. Its matplotlib chapter is considered barebones.

8 people gave an opinion

recommend it
7
criticize it
1
approval share
88%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 1 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: not recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 7 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 7 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
  • Recommended in 1 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Good introductory level coverage

    “it's a good introduction to implementing functions and equations”

    Comment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

    “it's rather good at an introductory level to the subject”

    Comment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Matplotlib chapter seems barebones

    “The matplotlib chapter seems fairly barebones but I remain in awe at this gorgeous latex work”

    Comment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

Other physics textbooks people recommend

The four most recommended other physics textbooks, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Computational Physics (2nd Edition) by Giordano and Nakanishi compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
The Feynman Lectures on Physicsby Feynman, Leighton and Sands34392%10—Approved
Course of Theoretical Physicsby Landau and Lifshitz8189%6——
Computational Physics (2nd Edition)by Giordano and NakanishiThis page7188%1——
General Relativityby Robert Wald60100%3——
Engineering Thermodynamics60100%1——
See all 13 physics textbooks, ranked

What people said

7 of the 8 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Should be modernized to Python or similar.”

CriticizesComment from 6 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“a much better selection of content if you want to actually do computational physics”

RecommendsComment from 6 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“a course structured like this is hard to beat”

RecommendsComment from 6 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“it's rather good at an introductory level to the subject”

RecommendsComment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“The matplotlib chapter seems fairly barebones but I remain in awe at this gorgeous latex work”

MixedComment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“I am sure this book is also great.”

RecommendsComment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

“it's a good introduction to implementing functions and equations”

RecommendsComment from 5 Apr 2026 in “Computational Physics (2nd Edition)”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.